Potential clinical benefits of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics for depression via the microbiota-gut-brain axis.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Ling-Yi Dai, Ru-Ru Chen, Hao-Ran Chen, Jia-Hui Yin, Zhen-Xing Huang, Bo-Wen Yin, Xing-Yan Liu
{"title":"Potential clinical benefits of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics for depression <i>via</i> the microbiota-gut-brain axis.","authors":"Ling-Yi Dai, Ru-Ru Chen, Hao-Ran Chen, Jia-Hui Yin, Zhen-Xing Huang, Bo-Wen Yin, Xing-Yan Liu","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v15.i5.98436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression is a common mental-health disorder worldwide. Several studies have demonstrated the effects of gut microbiota-targeting interventions, such as probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics (PPSP), on depression.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the potential benefits of PPSP on patients diagnosed with depressive disorder.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Elsevier Science Direct databases for relevant studies published from database inception to March 2024 was performed. Studies that used a randomized controlled trial design and evaluated differences in depression between PPSP and placebo were included. Depressive symptoms were assessed using a validated scale. Analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies comprising 906 patients with depressive symptoms were included. PPSP improved depression compared with placebo [SMD: -0.39 (95%CI: -0.60 to -0.17); <i>P</i> < 0.001]. PPSP resulted in significant reductions in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [MD: -1.72 (95%CI: -2.57 to -0.88); <i>P</i> < 0.001] and Beck Depression Inventory [MD: -2.69 (95%CI: -4.67 to -0.71); <i>P</i> < 0.001] scores. Sub-analysis confirmed the antidepressant effects of probiotics on depressive symptoms [SMD: -0.32 (95%CI: -0.48 to -0.16); <i>P</i> < 0.001], with prebiotics exerting no apparent effect [SMD: -0.08 (95%CI: -0.39 to -0.23); <i>P</i> = 0.62], and synbiotics exerting statistically significant benefits [SMD: -1.09 (95%CI: -1.45 to -0.73); <i>P</i> < 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PPSP effectively alleviates depressive symptoms, and subgroup analysis supports the benefits of probiotics and synbiotics. Nevertheless, evidence supporting the use of PPSP for the treatment of depression remains insufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"15 5","pages":"98436"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i5.98436","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depression is a common mental-health disorder worldwide. Several studies have demonstrated the effects of gut microbiota-targeting interventions, such as probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics (PPSP), on depression.

Aim: To assess the potential benefits of PPSP on patients diagnosed with depressive disorder.

Methods: A literature search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and Elsevier Science Direct databases for relevant studies published from database inception to March 2024 was performed. Studies that used a randomized controlled trial design and evaluated differences in depression between PPSP and placebo were included. Depressive symptoms were assessed using a validated scale. Analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4 (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020).

Results: Fourteen studies comprising 906 patients with depressive symptoms were included. PPSP improved depression compared with placebo [SMD: -0.39 (95%CI: -0.60 to -0.17); P < 0.001]. PPSP resulted in significant reductions in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [MD: -1.72 (95%CI: -2.57 to -0.88); P < 0.001] and Beck Depression Inventory [MD: -2.69 (95%CI: -4.67 to -0.71); P < 0.001] scores. Sub-analysis confirmed the antidepressant effects of probiotics on depressive symptoms [SMD: -0.32 (95%CI: -0.48 to -0.16); P < 0.001], with prebiotics exerting no apparent effect [SMD: -0.08 (95%CI: -0.39 to -0.23); P = 0.62], and synbiotics exerting statistically significant benefits [SMD: -1.09 (95%CI: -1.45 to -0.73); P < 0.001].

Conclusion: PPSP effectively alleviates depressive symptoms, and subgroup analysis supports the benefits of probiotics and synbiotics. Nevertheless, evidence supporting the use of PPSP for the treatment of depression remains insufficient.

益生菌、益生元、合成菌和后益生菌通过微生物-肠-脑轴治疗抑郁症的潜在临床益处。
背景:抑郁症是世界范围内常见的精神疾病。一些研究已经证明了针对肠道微生物群的干预措施,如益生菌、益生元、合成菌和后益生菌(PPSP),对抑郁症的影响。目的:评价PPSP对抑郁症患者的潜在疗效。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science和Elsevier Science Direct数据库自建库至2024年3月发表的相关研究。采用随机对照试验设计并评估PPSP和安慰剂在抑郁症方面差异的研究被纳入其中。使用有效的量表评估抑郁症状。使用Review Manager 5.4版(Cochrane Collaboration, 2020)进行分析。结果:14项研究包括906例抑郁症状患者。与安慰剂相比,PPSP改善了抑郁症[SMD: -0.39 (95%CI: -0.60至-0.17);P < 0.001]。PPSP导致汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表显著降低[MD: -1.72 (95%CI: -2.57至-0.88);P < 0.001]和贝克抑郁量表[MD: -2.69 (95%CI: -4.67 ~ -0.71);P < 0.001]得分。亚分析证实了益生菌对抑郁症状的抗抑郁作用[SMD: -0.32 (95%CI: -0.48至-0.16);P < 0.001],益生元无明显影响[SMD: -0.08 (95%CI: -0.39 ~ -0.23);P = 0.62],合生剂具有统计学意义的益处[SMD: -1.09 (95%CI: -1.45 ~ -0.73);P < 0.001]。结论:PPSP可有效缓解抑郁症状,亚组分析支持益生菌和合成菌的益处。然而,支持使用PPSP治疗抑郁症的证据仍然不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信