Cognitive bias modification for social anxiety: protocol for a living systematic review of human studies and meta-analysis.

Q1 Medicine
Wellcome Open Research Pub Date : 2025-05-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23278.2
Jaycee Kennett, Claire Friedrich, Virginia Chiocchia, Simon E Blackwell, Toshi Furukawa, Per Carlbring, Thomy Tonia, Ava Homiar, Simonne Wright, Kelvin Opiepie, Richardson Mojica, Paulina Schenk, Susan Michie, Janna Hastings, Hossein Dehdarirad, Claire Stansfield, James Thomas, Jennifer Potts, Georgia Salanti, Andrea Cipriani
{"title":"Cognitive bias modification for social anxiety: protocol for a living systematic review of human studies and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jaycee Kennett, Claire Friedrich, Virginia Chiocchia, Simon E Blackwell, Toshi Furukawa, Per Carlbring, Thomy Tonia, Ava Homiar, Simonne Wright, Kelvin Opiepie, Richardson Mojica, Paulina Schenk, Susan Michie, Janna Hastings, Hossein Dehdarirad, Claire Stansfield, James Thomas, Jennifer Potts, Georgia Salanti, Andrea Cipriani","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23278.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social anxiety is a heightened fear and discomfort in social situations. Cases of elevated distress and impaired functioning can lead to a clinical diagnosis of social anxiety disorder. Altering cognitive biases associated with social anxiety has been suggested as potentially beneficial; however, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of such interventions. The aim of this living systematic review is to examine the efficacy of cognitive bias modification for reducing social anxiety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We will search multiple electronic databases for randomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of cognitive bias modification for people diagnosed with social anxiety and people exposed to a social stressor. The primary outcome will be change in social anxiety related symptoms; secondary outcomes will be changes in social functioning and quality of life and adverse events. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be done by at least two reviewers using pre-defined tools. We will synthesise data from people with social anxiety diagnosis and those subjected to a simulated social stressor separately using random effects meta-analyses. Heterogeneity will be evaluated by investigating characteristics of included studies and we will conduct a network meta-analysis in order to compare the efficacy of subtypes of cognitive bias modification for social anxiety disorder. We will appraise the strength of the evidence for each outcome by reviewing the overall association, internal and external validity, and reporting biases. Where data allows, we will triangulate the evidence from both sources with a multidisciplinary group of experts. We will also descriptively report factors reported to mediate cognitive bias modification, The review will begin in living mode and the database search will be rerun every three months to identify potential new evidence. We will co-produce this review with members of a global lived experience advisory board. This protocol was registered on 15.10.2024 (CRD42024601380)..</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"657"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23278.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social anxiety is a heightened fear and discomfort in social situations. Cases of elevated distress and impaired functioning can lead to a clinical diagnosis of social anxiety disorder. Altering cognitive biases associated with social anxiety has been suggested as potentially beneficial; however, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of such interventions. The aim of this living systematic review is to examine the efficacy of cognitive bias modification for reducing social anxiety.

Methods: We will search multiple electronic databases for randomised controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of cognitive bias modification for people diagnosed with social anxiety and people exposed to a social stressor. The primary outcome will be change in social anxiety related symptoms; secondary outcomes will be changes in social functioning and quality of life and adverse events. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be done by at least two reviewers using pre-defined tools. We will synthesise data from people with social anxiety diagnosis and those subjected to a simulated social stressor separately using random effects meta-analyses. Heterogeneity will be evaluated by investigating characteristics of included studies and we will conduct a network meta-analysis in order to compare the efficacy of subtypes of cognitive bias modification for social anxiety disorder. We will appraise the strength of the evidence for each outcome by reviewing the overall association, internal and external validity, and reporting biases. Where data allows, we will triangulate the evidence from both sources with a multidisciplinary group of experts. We will also descriptively report factors reported to mediate cognitive bias modification, The review will begin in living mode and the database search will be rerun every three months to identify potential new evidence. We will co-produce this review with members of a global lived experience advisory board. This protocol was registered on 15.10.2024 (CRD42024601380)..

社交焦虑的认知偏见修正:人类研究的活系统回顾和荟萃分析方案。
背景:社交焦虑是指在社交场合中高度的恐惧和不适。加重痛苦和功能受损的病例可导致社交焦虑障碍的临床诊断。改变与社交焦虑相关的认知偏见被认为可能是有益的;然而,人们对这些干预措施的相对有效性知之甚少。本活系统回顾的目的是检验认知偏见修正对减少社交焦虑的功效。方法:我们将在多个电子数据库中检索随机对照试验,评估认知偏见修正对诊断为社交焦虑的人和暴露于社交压力源的人的疗效。主要结局是社交焦虑相关症状的改变;次要结果将是社会功能和生活质量的改变以及不良事件。研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估将由至少两名审稿人使用预先定义的工具完成。我们将使用随机效应荟萃分析分别综合诊断为社交焦虑的人和受到模拟社会压力的人的数据。异质性将通过调查纳入研究的特征来评估,我们将进行网络荟萃分析,以比较认知偏见修正亚型对社交焦虑障碍的疗效。我们将通过回顾整体关联、内部和外部效度以及报告偏倚来评估每个结果的证据强度。在数据允许的情况下,我们将与多学科专家小组对来自两个来源的证据进行三角测量。我们还将描述性地报告介导认知偏差修正的因素,该综述将在生活模式下开始,每三个月重新进行数据库搜索,以识别潜在的新证据。我们将与全球生活经验咨询委员会的成员共同编写这份审查报告。该协议在15.10.2024 (CRD42024601380)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wellcome Open Research
Wellcome Open Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信