{"title":"Machine-learning-based prognostic models for independence in toilet-related activities in patients with subacute stroke: a retrospective study.","authors":"Yuta Miyazaki, Michiyuki Kawakami, Kunitsugu Kondo, Akiko Hirabe, Takayuki Kamimoto, Tomonori Akimoto, Nanako Hijikata, Masahiro Tsujikawa, Kaoru Honaga, Kanjiro Suzuki, Tetsuya Tsuji","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2025.2516850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Independence in toilet‑related activities critically shapes discharge planning and caregiver burden after stroke. Reliable early‑stage prediction models could therefore aid individualized rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the predictive performance of logistic regression (LR) and five machine learning algorithms - decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), k‑nearest neighbors (KNN), and ensemble learning (EL) - for toilet-related independence at discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed subacute stroke survivors admitted to Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital from March 2015 to September 2019. Independence was defined as a score ≥ 6 on four Functional Independence Measure (FIM) subitems (toileting, bladder management, bowel management, toilet transfers). Participants' characteristics and FIM subitems were entered as predictors. LR and five machine‑learning algorithms were trained with five‑fold cross‑validation. Model performances were evaluated by the area under the receiver‑operating‑characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 824 participants (mean age 70.9 years), 453 (55%) were independent at discharge. In validation data, SVM (AUC = 0.9223) achieved, followed by LR (0.9202), ANN (0.9201), KNN (0.9072), EL (0.8961), and DT (0.8394). On test data, SVM and LR maintained AUCs of 0.9101 and 0.9078, whereas ANN declined to 0.8922. EL (0.9021) and KNN (0.9020) remained stable; DT (0.7864) performed the lowest. In LR, FIM-Bed to chair transfer was the strongest positive predictor, and age was the strongest negative predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SVM provided the highest accuracy with minimal overlearning. LR offered similar performance and greater interpretability, supporting its clinical use. These models could provide valuable information in stroke rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2516850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Independence in toilet‑related activities critically shapes discharge planning and caregiver burden after stroke. Reliable early‑stage prediction models could therefore aid individualized rehabilitation.
Objective: To compare the predictive performance of logistic regression (LR) and five machine learning algorithms - decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), k‑nearest neighbors (KNN), and ensemble learning (EL) - for toilet-related independence at discharge.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed subacute stroke survivors admitted to Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital from March 2015 to September 2019. Independence was defined as a score ≥ 6 on four Functional Independence Measure (FIM) subitems (toileting, bladder management, bowel management, toilet transfers). Participants' characteristics and FIM subitems were entered as predictors. LR and five machine‑learning algorithms were trained with five‑fold cross‑validation. Model performances were evaluated by the area under the receiver‑operating‑characteristic curve (AUC).
Results: Of 824 participants (mean age 70.9 years), 453 (55%) were independent at discharge. In validation data, SVM (AUC = 0.9223) achieved, followed by LR (0.9202), ANN (0.9201), KNN (0.9072), EL (0.8961), and DT (0.8394). On test data, SVM and LR maintained AUCs of 0.9101 and 0.9078, whereas ANN declined to 0.8922. EL (0.9021) and KNN (0.9020) remained stable; DT (0.7864) performed the lowest. In LR, FIM-Bed to chair transfer was the strongest positive predictor, and age was the strongest negative predictor.
Conclusions: SVM provided the highest accuracy with minimal overlearning. LR offered similar performance and greater interpretability, supporting its clinical use. These models could provide valuable information in stroke rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues.
The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.