Which school-based interventions work better to combat obesity in children? A network meta-analysis.

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Bahareh Nikooyeh, Zahra Yari, Zahra Hariri, Ghazal Baghdadi, Hootan Yazdani, Mohammad Esmail Motlagh, Tirang R Neyestani
{"title":"Which school-based interventions work better to combat obesity in children? A network meta-analysis.","authors":"Bahareh Nikooyeh, Zahra Yari, Zahra Hariri, Ghazal Baghdadi, Hootan Yazdani, Mohammad Esmail Motlagh, Tirang R Neyestani","doi":"10.1186/s13643-025-02871-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescent obesity is linked to a higher risk of becoming obese adults and developing chronic diseases. School-based interventions, focusing on nutritional education and physical activity (PA), are crucial for preventing childhood obesity. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of such interventions using network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies on school-based obesity interventions. Interventions included behavioral, nutritional, and physical activity components. Network meta-analysis (NMA) employed random-effects models, generating network plots. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranked intervention efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one studies were included. School-based interventions significantly reduced body mass index z-score (z-BMI; mean difference [MD]: - 0.06; 95% CI: - 0.1, - 0.03) and BMI (MD: - 0.351; 95% CI: - 0.566, - 0.135). NMA indicated that combined interventions, PA + health education (HE) + school policy (SP), were more effective in reducing BMI than HE alone (MD: - 0.61; 95% CI: - 1.2, - 0.02). SUCRA rankings highlighted PA + HE + SP and PA alone as the most effective interventions in reducing BMI and z-BMI, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>School-based interventions are effective long-term strategies for managing childhood obesity. Combining PA, HE, and SP showed the highest efficacy in reducing BMI. Meanwhile, intervention duration and parental involvement did not show any significant additional effect, necessitating further prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"125"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-025-02871-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adolescent obesity is linked to a higher risk of becoming obese adults and developing chronic diseases. School-based interventions, focusing on nutritional education and physical activity (PA), are crucial for preventing childhood obesity. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of such interventions using network meta-analysis.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies on school-based obesity interventions. Interventions included behavioral, nutritional, and physical activity components. Network meta-analysis (NMA) employed random-effects models, generating network plots. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranked intervention efficacy.

Results: Sixty-one studies were included. School-based interventions significantly reduced body mass index z-score (z-BMI; mean difference [MD]: - 0.06; 95% CI: - 0.1, - 0.03) and BMI (MD: - 0.351; 95% CI: - 0.566, - 0.135). NMA indicated that combined interventions, PA + health education (HE) + school policy (SP), were more effective in reducing BMI than HE alone (MD: - 0.61; 95% CI: - 1.2, - 0.02). SUCRA rankings highlighted PA + HE + SP and PA alone as the most effective interventions in reducing BMI and z-BMI, respectively.

Conclusion: School-based interventions are effective long-term strategies for managing childhood obesity. Combining PA, HE, and SP showed the highest efficacy in reducing BMI. Meanwhile, intervention duration and parental involvement did not show any significant additional effect, necessitating further prospective studies.

哪些以学校为基础的干预措施能更好地对抗儿童肥胖?网络元分析。
背景:青少年肥胖与成人肥胖和发展慢性疾病的高风险有关。以营养教育和身体活动为重点的学校干预措施对于预防儿童肥胖至关重要。本研究旨在利用网络元分析来评估这些干预措施的有效性。方法:我们检索了PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library中有关校本肥胖干预的研究。干预措施包括行为、营养和身体活动成分。网络元分析(NMA)采用随机效应模型,生成网络图。表面下累积排序曲线(SUCRA)对干预效果进行排序。结果:纳入61项研究。以学校为基础的干预措施显著降低了身体质量指数z-得分(z-BMI);平均差[MD]: - 0.06;95% CI: - 0.1, - 0.03)和BMI (MD: - 0.351;95% ci: - 0.566, - 0.135)。NMA显示,PA +健康教育(HE) +学校政策(SP)联合干预在降低BMI方面比单独干预更有效(MD: - 0.61;95% ci: - 1.2, - 0.02)。SUCRA排名强调PA + HE + SP和单独PA分别是降低BMI和z-BMI最有效的干预措施。结论:以学校为基础的干预措施是控制儿童肥胖的有效长期策略。PA、HE、SP联合用药降低BMI的效果最好。同时,干预时间和父母参与未显示任何显著的额外影响,需要进一步的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信