Upper Airway Control Therapy (U-ACT): The Development of a Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction.

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Respirology Pub Date : 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1111/resp.70073
Jemma Haines, Jaclyn A Smith, Stephen J Fowler, Janelle Yorke
{"title":"Upper Airway Control Therapy (U-ACT): The Development of a Non-Pharmacological Intervention for Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction.","authors":"Jemma Haines, Jaclyn A Smith, Stephen J Fowler, Janelle Yorke","doi":"10.1111/resp.70073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Non-pharmacological intervention is the recommended gold standard for inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) treatment. Despite this, there is no standardised approach and interventions are poorly described. The objective was to develop and describe a standardised non-pharmacological intervention for ILO, for future testing of effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MRC guidelines for complex intervention development were followed; the methodological approach was structured using the INDEX principles. The multi-phase research stages were: (1) evidence review; (2) qualitative data collection from speech and language therapists (n = 7) and patients (n = 22); (3) intervention design and theoretical underpinning; (4) prototype survey feedback from Stage 2 participants; and (5) final intervention description, using a validated reporting framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systematic review and synthesis of 14 studies (n = 527) identified key uncertainties and steered Stage 2 interviews. Framework analysis of qualitative data collected identified five overarching key themes for inclusion. The resulting 'Upper Airway Control Therapy' (U-ACT) intervention comprises two core components (education & empowerment; reliever breath control), four supporting components (bio-feedback training; prevention methods; supporting co-existing conditions; managing others' reactions to ILO) and a cross-cutting home practice component. U-ACT's mechanisms of action to bring about change includes 36 behaviour change techniques. Feedback on U-ACT protype was extremely positive; survey responders (n = 23; 87% response rate) strongly agreed to acceptability statements for all parameters surveyed [5-point Likert scale; median (range), 4.5, 3-5].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The U-ACT intervention, developed with keystakeholders and underpinned with a programme theory, is fully manualised and ready for evaluation. If future testing proves clinical and cost effectiveness, it could be incorporated into existing ILO services.</p>","PeriodicalId":21129,"journal":{"name":"Respirology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.70073","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Non-pharmacological intervention is the recommended gold standard for inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) treatment. Despite this, there is no standardised approach and interventions are poorly described. The objective was to develop and describe a standardised non-pharmacological intervention for ILO, for future testing of effectiveness.

Methods: MRC guidelines for complex intervention development were followed; the methodological approach was structured using the INDEX principles. The multi-phase research stages were: (1) evidence review; (2) qualitative data collection from speech and language therapists (n = 7) and patients (n = 22); (3) intervention design and theoretical underpinning; (4) prototype survey feedback from Stage 2 participants; and (5) final intervention description, using a validated reporting framework.

Results: Systematic review and synthesis of 14 studies (n = 527) identified key uncertainties and steered Stage 2 interviews. Framework analysis of qualitative data collected identified five overarching key themes for inclusion. The resulting 'Upper Airway Control Therapy' (U-ACT) intervention comprises two core components (education & empowerment; reliever breath control), four supporting components (bio-feedback training; prevention methods; supporting co-existing conditions; managing others' reactions to ILO) and a cross-cutting home practice component. U-ACT's mechanisms of action to bring about change includes 36 behaviour change techniques. Feedback on U-ACT protype was extremely positive; survey responders (n = 23; 87% response rate) strongly agreed to acceptability statements for all parameters surveyed [5-point Likert scale; median (range), 4.5, 3-5].

Conclusion: The U-ACT intervention, developed with keystakeholders and underpinned with a programme theory, is fully manualised and ready for evaluation. If future testing proves clinical and cost effectiveness, it could be incorporated into existing ILO services.

上呼吸道控制疗法(U-ACT):一种非药物干预诱导性喉梗阻的发展。
背景和目的:非药物干预被推荐为诱导性喉梗阻(ILO)治疗的金标准。尽管如此,目前还没有标准化的方法,对干预措施的描述也很差。目的是为劳工组织制定和描述一种标准化的非药物干预措施,以便将来测试其有效性。方法:遵循MRC复杂干预制定指南;方法方法是使用INDEX原则构建的。多阶段研究阶段为:(1)证据回顾;(2)从言语和语言治疗师(n = 7)和患者(n = 22)中收集定性数据;(3)干预设计与理论支撑;(4)第二阶段参与者的原型调查反馈;(5)最后的干预描述,使用经过验证的报告框架。结果:系统回顾和综合了14项研究(n = 527),确定了关键的不确定性,并指导了第二阶段的访谈。对所收集的定性数据进行框架分析,确定了五个主要的纳入主题。由此产生的“上呼吸道控制治疗”(U-ACT)干预包括两个核心部分(教育和授权;缓解呼吸控制),四个配套组件(生物反馈训练;预防方法;支持共存条件;管理他人对国际劳工组织的反应)和跨部门的家庭实践组成部分。U-ACT带来改变的行动机制包括36种行为改变技术。U-ACT原型机的反馈非常积极;调查应答者(n = 23;87%的回复率)强烈同意所有被调查参数的可接受性陈述[5点李克特量表;中位数(范围),4.5,3-5]。结论:U-ACT干预是由关键利益相关者共同开发的,并以项目理论为基础,是完全手动的,可以进行评估。如果今后的测试证明具有临床效益和成本效益,可将其纳入劳工组织现有的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respirology
Respirology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Respirology is a journal of international standing, publishing peer-reviewed articles of scientific excellence in clinical and clinically-relevant experimental respiratory biology and disease. Fields of research include immunology, intensive and critical care, epidemiology, cell and molecular biology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, paediatric respiratory medicine, clinical trials, interventional pulmonology and thoracic surgery. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and publishes papers in the following categories: Original Articles, Editorials, Reviews, and Correspondences. Respirology is the preferred journal of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, has been adopted as the preferred English journal of the Japanese Respiratory Society and the Taiwan Society of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and is an official journal of the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信