The human placenta and its role in reproductive outcomes revisited.

IF 29.9 1区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Physiological reviews Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI:10.1152/physrev.00039.2024
Irving L M H Aye, Stephen Tong, D Stephen Charnock-Jones, Gordon C S Smith
{"title":"The human placenta and its role in reproductive outcomes revisited.","authors":"Irving L M H Aye, Stephen Tong, D Stephen Charnock-Jones, Gordon C S Smith","doi":"10.1152/physrev.00039.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The placenta performs many key tasks that are essential for the healthy growth and development of the human fetus. Placental dysfunction has multiple manifestations, but they share the common property of lacking a mechanistic understanding of etiology. The clinical consequences of placental dysfunction are a major determinant of the global burden of disease. Currently, the primary clinical method for assessing placental function is ultrasonic Doppler flow velocimetry of the umbilical and uterine arteries. More recently, some biomarkers have emerged that can predict or diagnose placentally related complications of pregnancy. However, methods for identifying and characterizing placental dysfunction have developed relatively little over the last 20 years and perform poorly, and there remains an absence of disease-modifying therapies targeted at the placenta. Understanding disease mechanisms is made more difficult due to the profound differences in pregnancy and placentation comparing humans and the most commonly used laboratory animals, limiting the utility of animal models. The use of omics methods in human samples may yield progress: omics analyses of maternal blood show promise in identifying better predictors of disease, and single-cell analyses, including spatial omics of healthy and abnormal placentas, could identify therapeutic targets. Limitations in cellular models of the placenta have been significantly overcome in the last 5 to 10 years by the development of human cell models, including human trophoblast stem cells and organoids, and the use of these model systems may allow hypothesis testing experiments in a more clinically relevant context than animal models or immortalized cell lines.</p>","PeriodicalId":20193,"journal":{"name":"Physiological reviews","volume":" ","pages":"2305-2376"},"PeriodicalIF":29.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00039.2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The placenta performs many key tasks that are essential for the healthy growth and development of the human fetus. Placental dysfunction has multiple manifestations, but they share the common property of lacking a mechanistic understanding of etiology. The clinical consequences of placental dysfunction are a major determinant of the global burden of disease. Currently, the primary clinical method for assessing placental function is ultrasonic Doppler flow velocimetry of the umbilical and uterine arteries. More recently, some biomarkers have emerged that can predict or diagnose placentally related complications of pregnancy. However, methods for identifying and characterizing placental dysfunction have developed relatively little over the last 20 years and perform poorly, and there remains an absence of disease-modifying therapies targeted at the placenta. Understanding disease mechanisms is made more difficult due to the profound differences in pregnancy and placentation comparing humans and the most commonly used laboratory animals, limiting the utility of animal models. The use of omics methods in human samples may yield progress: omics analyses of maternal blood show promise in identifying better predictors of disease, and single-cell analyses, including spatial omics of healthy and abnormal placentas, could identify therapeutic targets. Limitations in cellular models of the placenta have been significantly overcome in the last 5 to 10 years by the development of human cell models, including human trophoblast stem cells and organoids, and the use of these model systems may allow hypothesis testing experiments in a more clinically relevant context than animal models or immortalized cell lines.

人类胎盘及其在生殖结果中的作用重新审视。
胎盘执行许多对人类胎儿健康生长和发育至关重要的关键任务。胎盘功能障碍有多种表现,但其共同特点是缺乏对病因机制的认识。胎盘功能障碍的临床后果是全球疾病负担的主要决定因素。目前,评估胎盘功能的主要临床方法是超声多普勒脐和子宫动脉血流速度法。最近,一些生物标志物已经出现,可以预测或诊断妊娠胎盘相关并发症。然而,在过去的20年中,识别和表征胎盘功能障碍的方法发展相对较少,表现不佳,并且仍然缺乏针对胎盘的疾病修饰疗法。由于人类和最常用的实验动物在怀孕和分娩方面存在巨大差异,因此了解疾病机制变得更加困难,这限制了动物模型的实用性。在人类样本中使用组学方法可能会取得进展:母体血液组学分析有望确定更好的疾病预测因素,单细胞分析,包括健康和异常胎盘的空间组学,可以确定治疗目标。在过去的五到十年中,人类细胞模型(包括人类滋养细胞干细胞和类器官)的发展大大克服了胎盘细胞模型的局限性,与动物模型或永生化细胞系相比,这些模型系统的使用可能允许在更具临床相关性的背景下进行假设检验实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological reviews
Physiological reviews 医学-生理学
CiteScore
56.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiological Reviews is a highly regarded journal that covers timely issues in physiological and biomedical sciences. It is targeted towards physiologists, neuroscientists, cell biologists, biophysicists, and clinicians with a special interest in pathophysiology. The journal has an ISSN of 0031-9333 for print and 1522-1210 for online versions. It has a unique publishing frequency where articles are published individually, but regular quarterly issues are also released in January, April, July, and October. The articles in this journal provide state-of-the-art and comprehensive coverage of various topics. They are valuable for teaching and research purposes as they offer interesting and clearly written updates on important new developments. Physiological Reviews holds a prominent position in the scientific community and consistently ranks as the most impactful journal in the field of physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信