Rapid ventricular pacing in cerebral aneurysm clipping: institutional workflow, systematic review, and single-arm meta-analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Johannes Wach, Martin Vychopen, Ferdinand Weber, Felix Arlt, Erdem Güresir
{"title":"Rapid ventricular pacing in cerebral aneurysm clipping: institutional workflow, systematic review, and single-arm meta-analysis.","authors":"Johannes Wach, Martin Vychopen, Ferdinand Weber, Felix Arlt, Erdem Güresir","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03668-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines the safety and efficacy of rapid ventricular pacing for cerebral aneurysm clipping, focusing on arrhythmia, mortality, aneurysm obliteration, neurological deficits, and myocardial damage assessed via postoperative troponin T levels, through an institutional series, systematic review, and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from institutional database and published studies investigating the use of RVP in both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Outcomes analyzed included postoperative arrhythmia, mortality, complete obliteration of aneurysms, pacing cycles, mean arterial pressure (MAP) during pacing, pacing rates, and postoperative troponin T levels. Pooled event rates and proportions were calculated using a common effect model, and heterogeneity across studies was assessed using I² statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 15 institutional cases, RVP-assisted aneurysm clipping achieved stable neurological outcomes, no cardiac complications, and 94% aneurysm obliteration. Combined with literature (141 patients), pooled arrhythmia and mortality rates were 1% and 0%, respectively. Aneurysm obliteration was 92%, new neurological deficits 4%, and troponin T levels 37.7 ng/L. Mean pacing rate, cycles, and MAP were 187.4 bpm, 6.5, and 41.1 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that rapid ventricular pacing in cerebral aneurysm clipping is associated with a low risk of cardiac arrhythmia and myocardial injury, while facilitating high rates of complete aneurysm obliteration. This technique appears safe, with minimal impact on postoperative mortality and neurological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03668-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study examines the safety and efficacy of rapid ventricular pacing for cerebral aneurysm clipping, focusing on arrhythmia, mortality, aneurysm obliteration, neurological deficits, and myocardial damage assessed via postoperative troponin T levels, through an institutional series, systematic review, and meta-analysis.

Methods: Data were extracted from institutional database and published studies investigating the use of RVP in both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. Outcomes analyzed included postoperative arrhythmia, mortality, complete obliteration of aneurysms, pacing cycles, mean arterial pressure (MAP) during pacing, pacing rates, and postoperative troponin T levels. Pooled event rates and proportions were calculated using a common effect model, and heterogeneity across studies was assessed using I² statistics.

Results: In 15 institutional cases, RVP-assisted aneurysm clipping achieved stable neurological outcomes, no cardiac complications, and 94% aneurysm obliteration. Combined with literature (141 patients), pooled arrhythmia and mortality rates were 1% and 0%, respectively. Aneurysm obliteration was 92%, new neurological deficits 4%, and troponin T levels 37.7 ng/L. Mean pacing rate, cycles, and MAP were 187.4 bpm, 6.5, and 41.1 mmHg.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that rapid ventricular pacing in cerebral aneurysm clipping is associated with a low risk of cardiac arrhythmia and myocardial injury, while facilitating high rates of complete aneurysm obliteration. This technique appears safe, with minimal impact on postoperative mortality and neurological outcomes.

脑动脉瘤夹闭术中快速心室起搏:机构工作流程、系统评价和单组荟萃分析。
背景:本研究通过机构系列、系统回顾和荟萃分析,探讨了快速心室起搏治疗脑动脉瘤夹闭的安全性和有效性,重点关注心律失常、死亡率、动脉瘤闭塞、神经功能缺损和术后肌钙蛋白T水平评估的心肌损伤。方法:从机构数据库和已发表的研究中提取数据,调查RVP在破裂和未破裂动脉瘤中的应用。结果分析包括术后心律失常、死亡率、动脉瘤完全闭塞、起搏周期、起搏期间平均动脉压(MAP)、起搏率和术后肌钙蛋白T水平。使用通用效应模型计算合并事件发生率和比例,并使用I²统计量评估各研究的异质性。结果:在15个机构病例中,rvp辅助动脉瘤夹闭获得了稳定的神经系统预后,无心脏并发症,94%的动脉瘤闭塞。结合文献(141例),合并心律失常和死亡率分别为1%和0%。动脉瘤闭塞92%,新发神经功能缺损4%,肌钙蛋白T水平37.7 ng/L。平均起搏速率、周期和MAP分别为187.4 bpm、6.5和41.1 mmHg。结论:脑动脉瘤夹闭术中快速心室起搏可降低心律失常和心肌损伤的风险,同时可提高动脉瘤完全闭塞率。这项技术似乎是安全的,对术后死亡率和神经预后的影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信