Association between complexity and adherence to psychotherapy in outpatients awaiting psychotherapy for mood and personality disorders.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI:10.1080/08039488.2025.2507737
Oliver Rumle Hovmand, Nina Reinholt, Anne Bryde, Kraka Bjørnholm, Dorrit Dilling-Hansen, Sidse Arnfred
{"title":"Association between complexity and adherence to psychotherapy in outpatients awaiting psychotherapy for mood and personality disorders.","authors":"Oliver Rumle Hovmand, Nina Reinholt, Anne Bryde, Kraka Bjørnholm, Dorrit Dilling-Hansen, Sidse Arnfred","doi":"10.1080/08039488.2025.2507737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Measure of Common Characteristics that Complicate Care (C4) is a clinician-administered checklist designed to quantify characteristics that could complicate care in outpatient psychiatry. This study investigated the C4 checklist against disturbance of personality function and early adherence to psychotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The recruits for the trial were patients awaiting group psychotherapy in psychotherapy outpatient clinics, who were scored with the C4 and responded to the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form (LPFS-BF) questionnaire. We compared differences in case complexity across diagnostic groups and the correlation with the LPFS-BF. Finally, we evaluated the usefulness of the C4 in identifying those who attended ≥ 3 of their first four sessions of psychotherapy by conducting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and linear regression analysis with percentage adherence as a dependent variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and fifty-nine patients with emotional disorders, personality disorders, and PTSD were included. Of these, 86 started their psychotherapy courses during the study and were included in the prediction analysis. C4 scores did not differ between diagnostic groups and were not correlated with the LPFS-BF. ROC analysis indicated poor accuracy (AUC=.46) in screening for early adherence to psychotherapy, as did analyses with the LPFS-BF as a cofactor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The C4 was not able to predict early adherence to psychotherapy in psychiatric outpatients, and as it also had no correlation with personality functioning, it was not possible to establish external validity. Future studies should investigate case complexity using a more controlled design and examine the outcomes of psychotherapy and adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19201,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"408-416"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2025.2507737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Measure of Common Characteristics that Complicate Care (C4) is a clinician-administered checklist designed to quantify characteristics that could complicate care in outpatient psychiatry. This study investigated the C4 checklist against disturbance of personality function and early adherence to psychotherapy.

Methods: The recruits for the trial were patients awaiting group psychotherapy in psychotherapy outpatient clinics, who were scored with the C4 and responded to the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form (LPFS-BF) questionnaire. We compared differences in case complexity across diagnostic groups and the correlation with the LPFS-BF. Finally, we evaluated the usefulness of the C4 in identifying those who attended ≥ 3 of their first four sessions of psychotherapy by conducting receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and linear regression analysis with percentage adherence as a dependent variable.

Results: One hundred and fifty-nine patients with emotional disorders, personality disorders, and PTSD were included. Of these, 86 started their psychotherapy courses during the study and were included in the prediction analysis. C4 scores did not differ between diagnostic groups and were not correlated with the LPFS-BF. ROC analysis indicated poor accuracy (AUC=.46) in screening for early adherence to psychotherapy, as did analyses with the LPFS-BF as a cofactor.

Conclusions: The C4 was not able to predict early adherence to psychotherapy in psychiatric outpatients, and as it also had no correlation with personality functioning, it was not possible to establish external validity. Future studies should investigate case complexity using a more controlled design and examine the outcomes of psychotherapy and adherence.

情绪和人格障碍门诊患者等待心理治疗的复杂性与心理治疗依从性之间的关系。
背景:复杂护理的共同特征测量(C4)是一个临床医生管理的检查表,旨在量化可能使门诊精神病学护理复杂化的特征。本研究探讨C4检查表对人格功能障碍和早期心理治疗依从性的影响。方法:本研究招募心理治疗门诊候诊的团体心理治疗患者,对其进行C4评分并填写人格功能水平量表-简易表格(LPFS-BF)问卷。我们比较了诊断组之间病例复杂性的差异以及与LPFS-BF的相关性。最后,我们通过进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和以百分比依从性为因变量的线性回归分析,评估C4在识别前四次心理治疗中参加≥3次的患者中的有用性。结果:共纳入159例情绪障碍、人格障碍和PTSD患者。其中86人在研究期间开始了心理治疗课程,并被纳入预测分析。C4评分在诊断组之间没有差异,也与LPFS-BF无关。ROC分析显示,筛查早期心理治疗依从性的准确性较差(AUC= 0.46),以LPFS-BF作为辅助因素的分析也是如此。结论:C4不能预测精神科门诊患者对心理治疗的早期依从性,而且由于它与人格功能也没有相关性,因此无法建立外部效度。未来的研究应该使用更可控的设计来调查病例复杂性,并检查心理治疗和依从性的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Nordic Journal of Psychiatry publishes international research on all areas of psychiatry. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry is the official journal for the eight psychiatry associations in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The journal aims to provide a leading international forum for high quality research on all themes of psychiatry including: Child psychiatry Adult psychiatry Psychotherapy Pharmacotherapy Social psychiatry Psychosomatic medicine Nordic Journal of Psychiatry accepts original research articles, review articles, brief reports, editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信