[Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy for Patients with a Prior MitraClip or Impella Intervention].

Q4 Medicine
Tomoki Ushijima, Takeo Fujino, Shogo Matsunaga, Satoshi Kimura, Hiromichi Sonoda, Akira Shiose
{"title":"[Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy for Patients with a Prior MitraClip or Impella Intervention].","authors":"Tomoki Ushijima, Takeo Fujino, Shogo Matsunaga, Satoshi Kimura, Hiromichi Sonoda, Akira Shiose","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some patients have undergone implantation of a durable left ventricular assist device( LVAD) following heart failure treatment with Impella( Abiomed) or MitraClip( Abbott). Impella may carry a potential risk of de novo aortic insufficiency (AI), while MitraClip may pose hemodynamic issues under LVAD circulation. In this report, we present the outcomes of durable LVAD therapy in patients with these prior treatments. Seventeen patients had previously received Impella support, and five had undergone MitraClip implantation. Among the 17 post-Impella patients, seven underwent aortic valvuloplasty during LVAD implantation, and one required surgical intervention due to AI progression 10 months postoperatively. Of the nine non-interventional patients, one with moderate AI underwent heart transplantation without intervention five years after the LVAD implantation, while the remaining eight patients had mild or less AI. Four of the five post-MitraClip patients underwent mitral valve replace ment with a bioprosthetic valve during LVAD implantation. The remaining non-interventional patient experienced no hemodynamic problems. The number of LVAD therapies for patients with a prior Impella or MitraClip intervention is expected to increase in the future. It is essential to establish an appropriate therapeutic strategy based on detailed and careful evaluations of individual cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":17841,"journal":{"name":"Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery","volume":"78 4","pages":"249-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kyobu geka. The Japanese journal of thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some patients have undergone implantation of a durable left ventricular assist device( LVAD) following heart failure treatment with Impella( Abiomed) or MitraClip( Abbott). Impella may carry a potential risk of de novo aortic insufficiency (AI), while MitraClip may pose hemodynamic issues under LVAD circulation. In this report, we present the outcomes of durable LVAD therapy in patients with these prior treatments. Seventeen patients had previously received Impella support, and five had undergone MitraClip implantation. Among the 17 post-Impella patients, seven underwent aortic valvuloplasty during LVAD implantation, and one required surgical intervention due to AI progression 10 months postoperatively. Of the nine non-interventional patients, one with moderate AI underwent heart transplantation without intervention five years after the LVAD implantation, while the remaining eight patients had mild or less AI. Four of the five post-MitraClip patients underwent mitral valve replace ment with a bioprosthetic valve during LVAD implantation. The remaining non-interventional patient experienced no hemodynamic problems. The number of LVAD therapies for patients with a prior Impella or MitraClip intervention is expected to increase in the future. It is essential to establish an appropriate therapeutic strategy based on detailed and careful evaluations of individual cases.

既往有MitraClip或Impella介入的患者的持久左心室辅助装置治疗。
一些患者在使用Impella(Abiomed)或MitraClip(雅培)治疗心力衰竭后植入了持久左心室辅助装置(LVAD)。Impella可能会带来新生主动脉功能不全(AI)的潜在风险,而MitraClip可能会在LVAD循环下造成血流动力学问题。在这篇报道中,我们介绍了有这些既往治疗的患者持久LVAD治疗的结果。17名患者先前接受了Impella支持,5名患者接受了MitraClip植入。在17例impella术后患者中,7例在LVAD植入期间进行了主动脉瓣成形术,1例因术后10个月AI进展需要手术干预。在9例非介入患者中,1例中度AI患者在LVAD植入5年后进行了无干预的心脏移植,其余8例患者为轻度或轻度AI。在植入左心室辅助装置期间,5名使用mitraclip后患者中有4名接受了生物假体二尖瓣置换。其余的非介入患者没有血流动力学问题。对于先前有Impella或MitraClip干预的患者,LVAD治疗的数量预计在未来会增加。在对个别病例进行详细和仔细的评估的基础上,制定适当的治疗策略是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
213
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信