CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS PREDICTS EEG-BASED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSES FOLLOWING NOXIOUS MECHANICAL STIMULATION IN A CONDITIONED PAIN MODULATION MODEL.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Elias Dreismickenbecker, Holger Stephan, Joschua Wiese, Malte Anders, Matthias Kreuzer, Johannes Fleckenstein, Ulf Henkemeier, Jörg Faber, Thomas Hilberg, Fabian Tomschi
{"title":"CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS PREDICTS EEG-BASED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSES FOLLOWING NOXIOUS MECHANICAL STIMULATION IN A CONDITIONED PAIN MODULATION MODEL.","authors":"Elias Dreismickenbecker, Holger Stephan, Joschua Wiese, Malte Anders, Matthias Kreuzer, Johannes Fleckenstein, Ulf Henkemeier, Jörg Faber, Thomas Hilberg, Fabian Tomschi","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Existing literature indicates that physical fitness affects endogenous pain modulation capacity, potentially impacting populations with impaired pain modulation ability. However, current evidence remains inconsistent, and there is a lack of studies employing objective measures to examine this relationship. The objective of this study was to assess whether individual physical performance levels can predict endogenous pain modulation variables in the electroencephalogram (EEG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The EEG-based somatosensory response following noxious mechanical stimulation was recorded as pinprick-evoked potentials (PEP) during conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in 32 healthy adults. To analyze physical fitness, cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) was measured by using spiroergometric analysis and strength was tested using isokinetic strength testing. Bivariate linear regressions were calculated to analyze a potential relationship between physical performance parameters and CPM variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects with higher CRF exhibited a greater decrease in the ERSP in the CPM paradigm in the EEG and a correspondingly lower activation during a conditioning stimulus (CS). The CRF predicted 14.0% of the variance in the activation during the CS (large effect), and 10.2% of the decrease in the ERSP in the CPM paradigm (moderate effect). No such relationship was observed between strength and EEG-based variables. When the groups were separated according to their physical fitness levels, no differences were observed between the groups during isolated mechanical stimulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicate that CRF is associated with altered somatosensory responses during the CPM paradigm in our EEG-based pattern. Higher CRF appears to facilitate pain modulation processes without affecting central sensitivity to noxious mechanical stimulation, highlighting the potential benefits of higher levels of endurance exercise, but not strength levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Existing literature indicates that physical fitness affects endogenous pain modulation capacity, potentially impacting populations with impaired pain modulation ability. However, current evidence remains inconsistent, and there is a lack of studies employing objective measures to examine this relationship. The objective of this study was to assess whether individual physical performance levels can predict endogenous pain modulation variables in the electroencephalogram (EEG).

Methods: The EEG-based somatosensory response following noxious mechanical stimulation was recorded as pinprick-evoked potentials (PEP) during conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in 32 healthy adults. To analyze physical fitness, cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) was measured by using spiroergometric analysis and strength was tested using isokinetic strength testing. Bivariate linear regressions were calculated to analyze a potential relationship between physical performance parameters and CPM variables.

Results: Subjects with higher CRF exhibited a greater decrease in the ERSP in the CPM paradigm in the EEG and a correspondingly lower activation during a conditioning stimulus (CS). The CRF predicted 14.0% of the variance in the activation during the CS (large effect), and 10.2% of the decrease in the ERSP in the CPM paradigm (moderate effect). No such relationship was observed between strength and EEG-based variables. When the groups were separated according to their physical fitness levels, no differences were observed between the groups during isolated mechanical stimulation.

Conclusions: The results indicate that CRF is associated with altered somatosensory responses during the CPM paradigm in our EEG-based pattern. Higher CRF appears to facilitate pain modulation processes without affecting central sensitivity to noxious mechanical stimulation, highlighting the potential benefits of higher levels of endurance exercise, but not strength levels.

在条件疼痛调节模型中,心肺适能预测有害机械刺激后以眼为基础的躯体感觉反应。
目的:现有文献表明,身体健康影响内源性疼痛调节能力,可能影响疼痛调节能力受损的人群。然而,目前的证据仍然不一致,并且缺乏采用客观措施来检验这种关系的研究。本研究的目的是评估个体体能水平是否可以预测脑电图(EEG)中的内源性疼痛调节变量。方法:用针刺诱发电位(PEP)记录32例健康成人在条件疼痛调节(CPM)过程中受到有害机械刺激后基于脑电图的躯体感觉反应。为了分析体质,采用肺活量测量法测量心肺适能(CRF),采用等速力量测试法测试力量。计算双变量线性回归来分析物理性能参数与CPM变量之间的潜在关系。结果:CRF高的受试者在CPM模式下表现出更大的ERSP下降,在条件反射刺激(CS)中表现出相应的低激活。CRF预测了CS过程中14.0%的激活变异(大效应),以及CPM范式中10.2%的ERSP下降(中等效应)。在强度和基于脑电图的变量之间没有观察到这种关系。当各组根据他们的身体健康水平分开时,在孤立的机械刺激下,各组之间没有观察到差异。结论:结果表明,在基于脑电图的CPM模式中,CRF与躯体感觉反应的改变有关。较高的CRF似乎促进了疼痛调节过程,而不会影响中枢对有害机械刺激的敏感性,这突出了高水平耐力运动的潜在益处,而不是力量水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信