Is Intra-articular Injection of Hyaluronic Acid, Corticosteroid or Platelet-rich Plasma Following Medical Ozone Superior to Medical Ozone Alone in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Songül Cömert Kiliç, Umid Babayev, Nihat Kiliç
{"title":"Is Intra-articular Injection of Hyaluronic Acid, Corticosteroid or Platelet-rich Plasma Following Medical Ozone Superior to Medical Ozone Alone in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis?","authors":"Songül Cömert Kiliç, Umid Babayev, Nihat Kiliç","doi":"10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) results in pain, limited function, and reduced quality of life. Medical ozone (MO) has been used to reduce TMJ pain and improve maximum incisal opening (MIO). However, it remains unclear whether intra-articular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA), corticosteroid (CS), or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection following IA MO injection alone is superior to IA MO injection alone.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to measure and compare pain reduction and improved MIO in subjects with TMJ-OA who underwent IA injections with MO, MO + HA, MO + CS, and MO + PRP.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>The researchers implemented a randomized clinical trial in adult patients with TMJ-OA, Wilkes IV and V, referred to the author's clinic from January 2022 through December 2024.</p><p><strong>Predictor variable: </strong>The predictor variables were the agents for IA injection. Subjects were randomized to one of 4 injection groups: MO, MO + HA, MO + CS, or MO + PRP.</p><p><strong>Main outcome variables: </strong>The outcome variables were changes in the pain measured using the visual analog scale and range of motion (MIO) from baseline (T0) to 6 months (T2) postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Covariates: </strong>Covariates were age and sex.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>The data were analyzed using repeated-measure analysis of variance and the Tukey-HSD test with significance set at P < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final study sample included 49 patients (mean age, 32.25 ± 13.17 years), with higher female prevalence: 11 (84.6%) in the MO group, 12 (100%) in the MO + HA group, and 11 (91.7%) in the MO + CS and the MO + PRP groups (P = .6). Pain reduced (p˂0.001), and MIO improved (p˂0.01) significantly in all groups. However, after estimating differences between 6 months and baseline outcomes, mean changes in the primary outcome variables showed no statistically significant differences among the 4 groups (pain, P = .6; MIO, P = .2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within the limitations of this study, combining treatments of HA, CS, or PRP with MO was not statistically significantly associated with therapeutic effects in reducing pain or improving jaw function in patients with TMJ-OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":16612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2025.05.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ-OA) results in pain, limited function, and reduced quality of life. Medical ozone (MO) has been used to reduce TMJ pain and improve maximum incisal opening (MIO). However, it remains unclear whether intra-articular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA), corticosteroid (CS), or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection following IA MO injection alone is superior to IA MO injection alone.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure and compare pain reduction and improved MIO in subjects with TMJ-OA who underwent IA injections with MO, MO + HA, MO + CS, and MO + PRP.

Study design: The researchers implemented a randomized clinical trial in adult patients with TMJ-OA, Wilkes IV and V, referred to the author's clinic from January 2022 through December 2024.

Predictor variable: The predictor variables were the agents for IA injection. Subjects were randomized to one of 4 injection groups: MO, MO + HA, MO + CS, or MO + PRP.

Main outcome variables: The outcome variables were changes in the pain measured using the visual analog scale and range of motion (MIO) from baseline (T0) to 6 months (T2) postoperatively.

Covariates: Covariates were age and sex.

Analysis: The data were analyzed using repeated-measure analysis of variance and the Tukey-HSD test with significance set at P < .05.

Results: The final study sample included 49 patients (mean age, 32.25 ± 13.17 years), with higher female prevalence: 11 (84.6%) in the MO group, 12 (100%) in the MO + HA group, and 11 (91.7%) in the MO + CS and the MO + PRP groups (P = .6). Pain reduced (p˂0.001), and MIO improved (p˂0.01) significantly in all groups. However, after estimating differences between 6 months and baseline outcomes, mean changes in the primary outcome variables showed no statistically significant differences among the 4 groups (pain, P = .6; MIO, P = .2).

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, combining treatments of HA, CS, or PRP with MO was not statistically significantly associated with therapeutic effects in reducing pain or improving jaw function in patients with TMJ-OA.

医用臭氧后关节内注射透明质酸、皮质类固醇或富血小板血浆是否优于单独使用医用臭氧治疗颞下颌关节骨性关节炎?
背景:颞下颌关节骨性关节炎(TMJ-OA)导致疼痛、功能受限和生活质量下降。医用臭氧(MO)已被用于减轻TMJ疼痛和改善最大切口(MIO)。然而,目前尚不清楚单独注射IA MO后关节内注射(IA)透明质酸(HA)、皮质类固醇(CS)或富血小板血浆(PRP)是否优于单独注射IA MO。目的:本研究的目的是测量和比较经内注射MO、MO + HA、MO + CS和MO + PRP治疗的TMJ-OA患者疼痛减轻和MIO改善情况。研究设计:研究人员在成年TMJ-OA患者中实施了一项随机临床试验,Wilkes IV和V,从2022年1月到2024年12月提交给作者的诊所。预测变量:预测变量为注射内酯类药物。受试者被随机分为4个注射组:MO、MO + HA、MO + CS或MO + PRP。主要结果变量:结果变量为术后基线(T0)至术后6个月(T2),采用视觉模拟量表和活动范围(MIO)测量疼痛的变化。协变量:协变量为年龄和性别。分析:采用重复测量方差分析和Tukey-HSD检验,显著性设置为P < 0.05。结果:最终纳入49例患者,平均年龄32.25±13.17岁,女性患病率较高:MO组11例(84.6%),MO + HA组12例(100%),MO + CS组和MO + PRP组11例(91.7%)(P = .6)。疼痛减轻(p小于0.001),MIO改善(p小于0.01)。然而,在估计6个月后与基线结果的差异后,4组间主要结果变量的平均变化无统计学意义(疼痛,P = .6;Mio, p = .2)。结论:在本研究的限制范围内,HA、CS或PRP联合MO治疗与TMJ-OA患者减轻疼痛或改善颌功能的治疗效果无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: This monthly journal offers comprehensive coverage of new techniques, important developments and innovative ideas in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Practice-applicable articles help develop the methods used to handle dentoalveolar surgery, facial injuries and deformities, TMJ disorders, oral cancer, jaw reconstruction, anesthesia and analgesia. The journal also includes specifics on new instruments and diagnostic equipment and modern therapeutic drugs and devices. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery is recommended for first or priority subscription by the Dental Section of the Medical Library Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信