Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Blocks and Their Role in a Cardiac Fast-Track Program.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Amir Zabida, Karen Foley, Cristopher Araya Gonzalez, Santiago Chaverra, Margarita Otalora Esteban, Kirubanand Senniappan, Paola Vidal Díaz, Juan Camilo Segura-Salguero, Bilal Ansari, Michael Kahn, Vivek Rao, George Djaiani
{"title":"Deep Parasternal Intercostal Plane Blocks and Their Role in a Cardiac Fast-Track Program.","authors":"Amir Zabida, Karen Foley, Cristopher Araya Gonzalez, Santiago Chaverra, Margarita Otalora Esteban, Kirubanand Senniappan, Paola Vidal Díaz, Juan Camilo Segura-Salguero, Bilal Ansari, Michael Kahn, Vivek Rao, George Djaiani","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine if deep parasternal intercostal plane (DPIP) blocks are associated with reduced opioid consumption and a subsequent reduction in postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A single-center tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Three hundred and eight adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery with median sternotomy between March 2021 and February 2023.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>DPIP blocks are performed after chest closure in the operating room under sterile conditions and with real-time ultrasound guidance. The control group did not receive DPIP blocks.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Median [range] postoperative hydromorphone consumption at 12 hours was 0.8 [0-2.6] mg vs. 1.2 [0-2.6] mg, p = 0.0004, and at 24 hours was 0.4 [0-3.2] mg versus 0.6 [0-3.4] mg, p = 0.007 in the DPIP and control groups, respectively. Predictors of reduced hydromorphone requirements included the presence of DPIP blocks, use of a dexmedetomidine infusion, and absence of composite comorbidities. Postoperative delirium was present in 17 (11%) and 23 (14.9%) patients in the DPIP block and control groups respectively (odds ratio 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.38-1.53, p = 0.45). The median [IQR] time to extubation was 135 [65, 274] minutes versus 196.5 [74, 420] minutes in the DPIP and control groups, respectively, p = 0.04. There was no difference with respect to major morbidity and mortality between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DPIP blocks were associated with decreased perioperative opioid consumption, and earlier tracheal extubation after cardiac surgery. DPIP blocks may be incorporated within the fast-track cardiac anesthesia pathways; however, alternative strategies need to be further explored to reduce postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.05.018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine if deep parasternal intercostal plane (DPIP) blocks are associated with reduced opioid consumption and a subsequent reduction in postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery.

Design: A retrospective observational study.

Setting: A single-center tertiary care hospital.

Participants: Three hundred and eight adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery with median sternotomy between March 2021 and February 2023.

Interventions: DPIP blocks are performed after chest closure in the operating room under sterile conditions and with real-time ultrasound guidance. The control group did not receive DPIP blocks.

Measurements and main results: Median [range] postoperative hydromorphone consumption at 12 hours was 0.8 [0-2.6] mg vs. 1.2 [0-2.6] mg, p = 0.0004, and at 24 hours was 0.4 [0-3.2] mg versus 0.6 [0-3.4] mg, p = 0.007 in the DPIP and control groups, respectively. Predictors of reduced hydromorphone requirements included the presence of DPIP blocks, use of a dexmedetomidine infusion, and absence of composite comorbidities. Postoperative delirium was present in 17 (11%) and 23 (14.9%) patients in the DPIP block and control groups respectively (odds ratio 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.38-1.53, p = 0.45). The median [IQR] time to extubation was 135 [65, 274] minutes versus 196.5 [74, 420] minutes in the DPIP and control groups, respectively, p = 0.04. There was no difference with respect to major morbidity and mortality between the two groups.

Conclusions: DPIP blocks were associated with decreased perioperative opioid consumption, and earlier tracheal extubation after cardiac surgery. DPIP blocks may be incorporated within the fast-track cardiac anesthesia pathways; however, alternative strategies need to be further explored to reduce postoperative delirium after cardiac surgery.

深胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞及其在心脏快速通道程序中的作用。
目的:确定深胸骨旁肋间平面(DPIP)阻滞是否与减少阿片类药物消耗和随后减少心脏手术后谵妄有关。设计:回顾性观察性研究。环境:单中心三级护理医院。参与者:在2021年3月至2023年2月期间接受心脏手术中位胸骨切开术的308名成年患者。干预措施:在无菌条件下,实时超声引导下,在手术室闭胸后进行DPIP阻滞。对照组不接受DPIP阻滞治疗。测量结果和主要结果:dppp组和对照组术后12小时氢吗啡酮的中位[范围]用量分别为0.8 [0-2.6]mg和1.2 [0-2.6]mg, p = 0.0004, 24小时用量分别为0.4 [0-3.2]mg和0.6 [0-3.4]mg, p = 0.007。氢吗啡酮需求量减少的预测因素包括dip阻滞的存在、右美托咪定输注的使用以及无复合合并症。DPIP阻滞组和对照组分别有17例(11%)和23例(14.9%)患者出现术后谵妄(优势比0.76;95%置信区间0.38 ~ 1.53,p = 0.45)。拔管的中位[IQR]时间为135[65,274]分钟,而DPIP组和对照组的中位[IQR]时间为196.5[74,420]分钟,p = 0.04。两组在主要发病率和死亡率方面没有差异。结论:DPIP阻滞与心脏手术后围手术期阿片类药物消耗减少和早期气管拔管有关。DPIP阻滞可纳入心脏快速麻醉通路;然而,需要进一步探索其他策略来减少心脏手术后谵妄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信