Association of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Route at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy with Postoperative Complications.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Selma Su, Sophia Neman, Naomi Fields, Douglas Luchristt, C Emi Bretschneider
{"title":"Association of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Route at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy with Postoperative Complications.","authors":"Selma Su, Sophia Neman, Naomi Fields, Douglas Luchristt, C Emi Bretschneider","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06175-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP) with concomitant minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) is a frequently employed reconstructive surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse; however, the literature is limited regarding how the route of MIH affects postoperative adverse events. This study was aimed at investigating the association of route of MIH at the time of minimally invasive SCP and 30-day postoperative adverse events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database to compare perioperative adverse events for patients who underwent minimally invasive SCP with MIH for uterovaginal prolapse. MIH included total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (SCH), laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH). Perioperative adverse events of the four routes of MIH were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 7690 patients were identified. TLH was the most common route of MIH (56%), followed by laparoscopic SCH (39%), TVH (3%), and LAVH (2%). The rate of any 30-day adverse event was 10% and rates were similar between MIH groups. On multivariate logistic regression controlling for confounders, there were no significant differences in rates of postoperative adverse events between MIH groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adverse events following MIH at the time of SCP are not associated with the route of hysterectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06175-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP) with concomitant minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) is a frequently employed reconstructive surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse; however, the literature is limited regarding how the route of MIH affects postoperative adverse events. This study was aimed at investigating the association of route of MIH at the time of minimally invasive SCP and 30-day postoperative adverse events.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement database to compare perioperative adverse events for patients who underwent minimally invasive SCP with MIH for uterovaginal prolapse. MIH included total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (SCH), laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH). Perioperative adverse events of the four routes of MIH were compared.

Results: During the study period, 7690 patients were identified. TLH was the most common route of MIH (56%), followed by laparoscopic SCH (39%), TVH (3%), and LAVH (2%). The rate of any 30-day adverse event was 10% and rates were similar between MIH groups. On multivariate logistic regression controlling for confounders, there were no significant differences in rates of postoperative adverse events between MIH groups.

Conclusion: Adverse events following MIH at the time of SCP are not associated with the route of hysterectomy.

骶髋固定术时微创子宫切除术路径与术后并发症的关系。
简介与假设:微创骶colpopexy (SCP)联合微创子宫切除术(MIH)是盆腔器官脱垂的常用重建手术治疗方法;然而,关于MIH途径如何影响术后不良事件的文献有限。本研究旨在探讨微创性SCP时MIH通路与术后30天不良事件的关系。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进数据库,比较微创SCP合并MIH治疗子宫阴道脱垂患者围手术期不良事件。MIH包括腹腔镜全子宫切除术(TLH)、腹腔镜宫颈上子宫切除术(SCH)、腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术(LAVH)和阴道全子宫切除术(TVH)。比较四种途径MIH围手术期不良事件。结果:在研究期间,共发现7690例患者。TLH是最常见的MIH途径(56%),其次是腹腔镜SCH(39%)、TVH(3%)和LAVH(2%)。任何30天不良事件的发生率为10%,MIH组之间的发生率相似。在控制混杂因素的多因素logistic回归分析中,MIH组之间的术后不良事件发生率无显著差异。结论:宫缩性瘫痪时MIH的不良事件与子宫切除方式无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信