Evaluating adherence in an active-controlled HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis trial (PrEPVacc) to inform the estimation of HIV incidence in a counterfactual placebo arm.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
HIV Research & Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-11 DOI:10.1080/25787489.2025.2513684
Sheila Kansiime, Christian Holm Hansen, Henry Bern, Julie Fox, David Dunn, Eugene Ruzagira, Richard Hayes, Sheena Mc Cormack
{"title":"Evaluating adherence in an active-controlled HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis trial (PrEPVacc) to inform the estimation of HIV incidence in a counterfactual placebo arm.","authors":"Sheila Kansiime, Christian Holm Hansen, Henry Bern, Julie Fox, David Dunn, Eugene Ruzagira, Richard Hayes, Sheena Mc Cormack","doi":"10.1080/25787489.2025.2513684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inferring the counterfactual placebo HIV incidence using the estimated effectiveness of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir (TDF/FTC) in active-controlled pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trials has been suggested. However, it has not yet been widely applied. In this article, we evaluate adherence to TDF/FTC in the PrEPVacc trial (NCT04066881) and consider how such adherence data could be used to estimate the effectiveness of TDF/FTC and subsequently, HIV incidence in a counterfactual placebo arm in a predominantly female population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From December 2020 to March 2023 participants were recruited into the trial which included a comparison of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF/FTC) to TDF/FTC as PrEP over 26 weeks of follow-up, in Uganda, Tanzania, and South Africa. PrEP adherence was assessed in various ways.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 697 participants dispensed TDF/FTC, 87% were female, 54% were ≥ 25 years, and 59% were sex workers. In a random sample (41%) assessed at visit 6 (week 8), 76% had detectable TFV-DP levels, with 22% reaching levels consistent with ≥2 pills/week. Males, Verulam and Mbeya participants, those ≥ 25 years, not single, subsistence fisheries workers, and those who had any STI at baseline were more likely to have higher adherence. Of those assessed at visit 6, 29% were identified as white coat dosing. Estimated (crude) HIV incidence risk reduction ranged from 10% to 65%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TDF/FTC adherence in the PrEPVacc trial was low, with considerable levels of white coat dosing. Inferring the counterfactual placebo HIV incidence using the estimated effectiveness of TDF/FTC is a promising approach, however, the approach requires further elaboration and evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13165,"journal":{"name":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","volume":"26 1","pages":"2513684"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25787489.2025.2513684","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inferring the counterfactual placebo HIV incidence using the estimated effectiveness of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir (TDF/FTC) in active-controlled pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) trials has been suggested. However, it has not yet been widely applied. In this article, we evaluate adherence to TDF/FTC in the PrEPVacc trial (NCT04066881) and consider how such adherence data could be used to estimate the effectiveness of TDF/FTC and subsequently, HIV incidence in a counterfactual placebo arm in a predominantly female population.

Methods: From December 2020 to March 2023 participants were recruited into the trial which included a comparison of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF/FTC) to TDF/FTC as PrEP over 26 weeks of follow-up, in Uganda, Tanzania, and South Africa. PrEP adherence was assessed in various ways.

Results: Of 697 participants dispensed TDF/FTC, 87% were female, 54% were ≥ 25 years, and 59% were sex workers. In a random sample (41%) assessed at visit 6 (week 8), 76% had detectable TFV-DP levels, with 22% reaching levels consistent with ≥2 pills/week. Males, Verulam and Mbeya participants, those ≥ 25 years, not single, subsistence fisheries workers, and those who had any STI at baseline were more likely to have higher adherence. Of those assessed at visit 6, 29% were identified as white coat dosing. Estimated (crude) HIV incidence risk reduction ranged from 10% to 65%.

Conclusions: TDF/FTC adherence in the PrEPVacc trial was low, with considerable levels of white coat dosing. Inferring the counterfactual placebo HIV incidence using the estimated effectiveness of TDF/FTC is a promising approach, however, the approach requires further elaboration and evaluation.

评估主动对照HIV暴露前预防试验(PrEPVacc)的依从性,以估计反事实安慰剂组的HIV发病率。
背景:有人建议在主动控制的暴露前预防(PrEP)试验中使用恩曲他滨/替诺福韦(TDF/FTC)的估计有效性来推断反事实安慰剂HIV发病率。然而,它尚未得到广泛应用。在本文中,我们评估了PrEPVacc试验(NCT04066881)中TDF/FTC的依从性,并考虑了如何使用这些依从性数据来估计TDF/FTC的有效性,以及随后在以女性为主的反事实安慰剂组中的HIV发病率。方法:从2020年12月到2023年3月,在乌干达、坦桑尼亚和南非招募参与者,在26周的随访中,将恩曲他滨/替诺福韦阿拉芬胺(TAF/FTC)与TDF/FTC作为PrEP进行比较。以各种方式评估PrEP依从性。结果:697名TDF/FTC参与者中,87%为女性,54%年龄≥25岁,59%为性工作者。在随访第6周(第8周)评估的随机样本(41%)中,76%的人检测到TFV-DP水平,22%的人达到≥2片/周的水平。男性,Verulam和Mbeya参与者,≥25岁,非单身,自给渔业工人,以及基线时有任何性传播感染的人更有可能有更高的依从性。在就诊6时评估的患者中,29%被确定为白大衣剂量。估计(粗略)艾滋病毒发病率风险降低幅度在10%至65%之间。结论:在PrEPVacc试验中,TDF/FTC依从性较低,白大衣剂量水平相当高。利用TDF/FTC的估计有效性推断反事实安慰剂HIV发病率是一种很有前途的方法,然而,该方法需要进一步的阐述和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信