Youth benefit finding and caregiving in a parental illness context: a latent profile analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-05-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1601162
Giulia Landi, Kenneth I Pakenham, Jade Pilato, Géraldine Dorard, Aurélie Untas, Roberto Cattivelli, Silvana Grandi, Eliana Tossani
{"title":"Youth benefit finding and caregiving in a parental illness context: a latent profile analysis.","authors":"Giulia Landi, Kenneth I Pakenham, Jade Pilato, Géraldine Dorard, Aurélie Untas, Roberto Cattivelli, Silvana Grandi, Eliana Tossani","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1601162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study used a person-centred approach to identify patterns of engagement in benefit finding (BF) and caregiving among youth who have a parent with a serious illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 403 youth completed questionnaires in a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Latent profile analyses revealed four profiles. The distribution of caregiving and participants across profiles reflected the caregiving continuum. The 'low BF & caregiving profile' had the lowest caregiving and the highest proportion of participants at the low end of the continuum, while the 'moderate BF & extremely high caregiving profile' had the highest caregiving and the lowest proportion of participants at the high end. The two mid-continuum profiles reflected mid-to-high proportions of caregiving and participants. Results highlighted a corresponding continuum in BF, where engagement varies in sync with caregiving intensity. Profiles differed on demographics, caregiving context, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and mental health variables. The two mid-continuum profiles reported high caregiving and moderate-to-high BF and evidenced better HRQoL and mental health than the profile at the highest end of the caregiving continuum, but worse HRQoL and mental health than the profile at the lowest end. Despite high caregiving, these two profiles exhibited moderately high HRQoL and mental health, indicating that BF mitigates the adverse impacts of high caregiving. Results also supported the BF theoretical proposal that caregiving must be sufficiently intense to trigger BF.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Support services should reduce youth caregiving responsibilities and encourage youth caregivers to explore the positive aspects of their caregiving role.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1601162"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1601162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study used a person-centred approach to identify patterns of engagement in benefit finding (BF) and caregiving among youth who have a parent with a serious illness.

Methods: A total of 403 youth completed questionnaires in a cross-sectional study.

Results: Latent profile analyses revealed four profiles. The distribution of caregiving and participants across profiles reflected the caregiving continuum. The 'low BF & caregiving profile' had the lowest caregiving and the highest proportion of participants at the low end of the continuum, while the 'moderate BF & extremely high caregiving profile' had the highest caregiving and the lowest proportion of participants at the high end. The two mid-continuum profiles reflected mid-to-high proportions of caregiving and participants. Results highlighted a corresponding continuum in BF, where engagement varies in sync with caregiving intensity. Profiles differed on demographics, caregiving context, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and mental health variables. The two mid-continuum profiles reported high caregiving and moderate-to-high BF and evidenced better HRQoL and mental health than the profile at the highest end of the caregiving continuum, but worse HRQoL and mental health than the profile at the lowest end. Despite high caregiving, these two profiles exhibited moderately high HRQoL and mental health, indicating that BF mitigates the adverse impacts of high caregiving. Results also supported the BF theoretical proposal that caregiving must be sufficiently intense to trigger BF.

Discussion: Support services should reduce youth caregiving responsibilities and encourage youth caregivers to explore the positive aspects of their caregiving role.

青年利益发现和照顾在父母疾病的背景下:一个潜在的概况分析。
引言:本研究采用以人为本的方法来确定在父母患有严重疾病的青少年中参与寻找利益(BF)和照顾的模式。方法:采用横断面调查方法,对403名青少年进行问卷调查。结果:潜在特征分析揭示了四种特征。照顾行为和参与者的分布反映了照顾行为的连续性。在连续体的低端,“低男朋友和照顾”的参与者的照顾最少,比例最高,而“中等男朋友和极高照顾”的参与者的照顾最多,比例最低。两个中连续谱反映了照顾者和参与者的中高比例。结果强调了在BF中相应的连续体,其中参与与照顾强度同步变化。在人口统计学、护理背景、健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和心理健康变量方面,概况存在差异。两种中间连续谱报告了高照护和中高BF,并证明HRQoL和心理健康优于照护连续谱的最高端,但HRQoL和心理健康低于最低端。尽管有高照护,但这两类人的HRQoL和心理健康水平均较高,表明BF减轻了高照护的不利影响。结果也支持了BF理论建议,即照顾必须足够强烈才能触发BF。讨论:支持服务应减少青年照顾的责任,并鼓励青年照顾者探索其照顾角色的积极方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信