{"title":"The psychological impact of spending a prolonged time awaiting asylum.","authors":"Aleena Shahzad, Cornelius Katona, Naomi Glover","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2506189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and objectives:</b> In the last decade, Europe has witnessed a substantial increase in asylum applications, resulting in a growing backlog of cases. The prolonged wait has been associated with elevated risks of mental disorders, diminished psychological well-being, and reduced quality of life. Existing systematic reviews focus on multiple post-migration factors; however, delay was identified as a key contributor to poor mental health and decreased emotional wellbeing. Our review focuses on this factor and builds on existing literature.<b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis focusing on the impact of extended waiting periods on the mental health of asylum seekers. Searches were conducted on MEDLINE and PsycINFO, resulting in a total of sixteen studies. These studies were qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods designs, all focusing on the duration of the asylum process and its effects on mental well-being. The overall quality of these studies ranged from adequate to low.<b>Results:</b> Several adverse mental health outcomes associated with prolonged asylum waiting times were identified, including an increased risk of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder, and worsening of pre-existing mental illnesses. The extended wait exacerbated suicidal ideation due to frustration stemming from an inability to engage in meaningful activities, social isolation, and perceived discrimination from others. The ambiguity surrounding asylum procedures, caseworker reluctance to provide updates or clear timelines, and prolonged family separation also negatively impacted asylum seekers' mental health.<b>Conclusion:</b> These findings highlight the importance of reforming current asylum procedures to create a more humane and efficient process that protects the mental health of asylum seekers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2506189"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2506189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: In the last decade, Europe has witnessed a substantial increase in asylum applications, resulting in a growing backlog of cases. The prolonged wait has been associated with elevated risks of mental disorders, diminished psychological well-being, and reduced quality of life. Existing systematic reviews focus on multiple post-migration factors; however, delay was identified as a key contributor to poor mental health and decreased emotional wellbeing. Our review focuses on this factor and builds on existing literature.Methods: We conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis focusing on the impact of extended waiting periods on the mental health of asylum seekers. Searches were conducted on MEDLINE and PsycINFO, resulting in a total of sixteen studies. These studies were qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods designs, all focusing on the duration of the asylum process and its effects on mental well-being. The overall quality of these studies ranged from adequate to low.Results: Several adverse mental health outcomes associated with prolonged asylum waiting times were identified, including an increased risk of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder, and worsening of pre-existing mental illnesses. The extended wait exacerbated suicidal ideation due to frustration stemming from an inability to engage in meaningful activities, social isolation, and perceived discrimination from others. The ambiguity surrounding asylum procedures, caseworker reluctance to provide updates or clear timelines, and prolonged family separation also negatively impacted asylum seekers' mental health.Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of reforming current asylum procedures to create a more humane and efficient process that protects the mental health of asylum seekers.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.