Real-world outcomes of women with metastatic breast cancer in visceral crisis treated with chemotherapy: a 15-year cohort from Brazil.

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
ecancermedicalscience Pub Date : 2025-04-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2025.1894
Matheus de Oliveira Andrade, Vitor Hugo Felix, Laura Testa, Renata Colombo Bonadioa
{"title":"Real-world outcomes of women with metastatic breast cancer in visceral crisis treated with chemotherapy: a 15-year cohort from Brazil.","authors":"Matheus de Oliveira Andrade, Vitor Hugo Felix, Laura Testa, Renata Colombo Bonadioa","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2025.1894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Visceral crisis (VC) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is defined as a severe organ dysfunction related to metastatic disease. The cornerstone of treatment for VC relies on polychemotherapy, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where it often represents the only available therapeutic option. This study aims to assess survival outcomes of palliative chemotherapy (CT) for VC in a real-world scenario.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from patients with MBC diagnosed with VC between 2008 and 2022 in a large cancer center in Brazil. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated through univariate and multivariable analyses using the Cox regression model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 146 patients with VC were included. The predominant type of VC was pulmonary (36.3%), hepatic (32.2%) and bone marrow infiltration (19.2%). VC management was based on combination CT (51.4%), while 27.4% were treated with monochemotherapy and 20.6% received best supportive care (BSC). The median overall survival (mOS) for the entire population was 2.17 months. Treatment for VC in the first-line setting was associated with a mOS of 5 months. In the multivariate analysis, hepatic VC and the absence of active oncological therapy (BSC) were significantly associated with mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with MBC in VC have a poor prognosis even when treated with polychemotherapy. Proper prognostication is crucial for identifying patients who may benefit from active systemic therapy while carefully avoiding potentially futile strategies. Prospective trials including patients with VC criteria are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CT and other emerging therapies in this scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1894"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2025.1894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Visceral crisis (VC) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is defined as a severe organ dysfunction related to metastatic disease. The cornerstone of treatment for VC relies on polychemotherapy, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where it often represents the only available therapeutic option. This study aims to assess survival outcomes of palliative chemotherapy (CT) for VC in a real-world scenario.

Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from patients with MBC diagnosed with VC between 2008 and 2022 in a large cancer center in Brazil. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were evaluated through univariate and multivariable analyses using the Cox regression model.

Results: A total of 146 patients with VC were included. The predominant type of VC was pulmonary (36.3%), hepatic (32.2%) and bone marrow infiltration (19.2%). VC management was based on combination CT (51.4%), while 27.4% were treated with monochemotherapy and 20.6% received best supportive care (BSC). The median overall survival (mOS) for the entire population was 2.17 months. Treatment for VC in the first-line setting was associated with a mOS of 5 months. In the multivariate analysis, hepatic VC and the absence of active oncological therapy (BSC) were significantly associated with mortality.

Conclusion: Patients with MBC in VC have a poor prognosis even when treated with polychemotherapy. Proper prognostication is crucial for identifying patients who may benefit from active systemic therapy while carefully avoiding potentially futile strategies. Prospective trials including patients with VC criteria are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CT and other emerging therapies in this scenario.

接受化疗的转移性乳腺癌患者内脏危象的真实结果:一项巴西15年队列研究
转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的内脏危象(VC)被定义为与转移性疾病相关的严重器官功能障碍。VC治疗的基础依赖于多重化疗,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,这往往是唯一可用的治疗选择。本研究旨在评估现实世界中VC姑息性化疗(CT)的生存结果。方法:回顾性收集巴西一家大型癌症中心2008年至2022年间诊断为VC的MBC患者的数据。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。采用Cox回归模型,通过单变量和多变量分析评估预后因素。结果:共纳入146例VC患者。VC以肺(36.3%)、肝(32.2%)和骨髓浸润(19.2%)为主。51.4%的患者接受联合CT治疗,27.4%的患者接受单一化疗,20.6%的患者接受最佳支持治疗(BSC)。整个人群的中位总生存期(mOS)为2.17个月。一线治疗的VC与5个月的生存期相关。在多变量分析中,肝VC和缺乏积极肿瘤治疗(BSC)与死亡率显著相关。结论:VC合并MBC患者即使接受多种化疗,预后仍较差。正确的预后对于识别可能从积极的全身治疗中获益的患者至关重要,同时小心避免潜在的无效策略。在这种情况下,需要前瞻性试验,包括符合VC标准的患者,来评估CT和其他新兴疗法的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信