Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 2 to 4 years old.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sophie M Phillips, Francesca Spiga, Theresa Hm Moore, Sarah Dawson, Hannah Stockton, Rita Rizk, Hung-Yuan Cheng, Rebecca K Hodder, Yang Gao, Frances Hillier-Brown, Kiran Rai, Connor B Yu, Kate M O'Brien, Carolyn D Summerbell
{"title":"Interventions to prevent obesity in children aged 2 to 4 years old.","authors":"Sophie M Phillips, Francesca Spiga, Theresa Hm Moore, Sarah Dawson, Hannah Stockton, Rita Rizk, Hung-Yuan Cheng, Rebecca K Hodder, Yang Gao, Frances Hillier-Brown, Kiran Rai, Connor B Yu, Kate M O'Brien, Carolyn D Summerbell","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD015326.pub2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Early childhood presents an important opportunity for obesity prevention, an international public health priority. Interventions aiming to prevent obesity typically promote healthy diets or activity levels (physical activity, sedentary behaviour), or both. There is uncertainty over which approaches are more effective. This is one of a suite of three reviews addressing interventions for preventing obesity in children, each focusing on different age groups up to 18 years. These reviews replace and update a 2019 Cochrane review on interventions for preventing obesity in children from birth to 18 years.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of interventions that aimed to prevent obesity in children aged two to four years by changing dietary intake or activity levels, or both, on body mass index (BMI), BMI z-score (zBMI), BMI percentile, and serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, six other databases, and two trial registers, together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify eligible studies. The latest search date was 7 February 2023.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in children aged two to four years, comparing dietary or activity interventions (or both combined) to prevent overweight or obesity versus no intervention, usual care, or another eligible intervention, in any setting. Studies had to measure outcomes at a minimum of 12 weeks post-baseline. There were no language restrictions.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Our outcomes were BMI, zBMI, BMI percentile, and serious adverse events.</p><p><strong>Risk of bias: </strong>We used version 2 of the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) to assess included RCTs.</p><p><strong>Synthesis methods: </strong>Working independently, two authors screened studies, extracted data, and conducted risk of bias and GRADE assessments. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses stratified by type of intervention and follow-up duration.</p><p><strong>Included studies: </strong>We included 67 studies (36,601 participants), with 56 studies (21,404 participants) pooled in the meta-analyses. Sixty-three studies were conducted in high-income countries. Study settings were split between childcare (26 studies; 39%), home (23 studies; 34%), and home plus childcare settings (10 studies; 15%). Few studies were conducted in the community (three studies; 5%) or healthcare settings (five studies; 7%). Most studies compared a combined dietary/activity intervention with a control group.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>Dietary interventions versus control Dietary interventions may have little to no effect on BMI at short-term follow-up (mean difference (MD) 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.28 to 0.28; 1 study, 94 participants; low-certainty evidence). At medium- and long-term follow-up, dietary interventions may result in little to no difference in BMI. One study (103 participants; low-certainty evidence) reported no difference in BMI at medium-term follow-up, and one study (2238 participants; low-certainty evidence) found lower rates of overweight and obesity in the intervention group at long-term follow-up. Dietary interventions likely result in little to no difference in zBMI at short-term (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.19; 2 studies, 145 participants) and medium-term follow-up (MD -0.17, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.10; 1 study, 389 participants), both with moderate-certainty evidence. None of the included studies reported zBMI at long-term follow-up. None of the studies reported serious adverse events. Activity interventions versus control Activity interventions may have little to no effect on BMI at short-term follow-up, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD -0.10, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.08; 6 studies, 826 participants; very low-certainty evidence). They likely reduce BMI at medium-term follow-up (MD -0.70, 95% CI -1.09 to -0.31; 1 study, 567 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported BMI at long-term follow-up. Activity interventions likely result in little to no difference in zBMI at short-term follow-up (MD -0.06, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.07; 3 studies, 635 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). They may result in little to no difference in zBMI at medium-term follow-up, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD -0.00, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.11; 4 studies, 1083 participants; very low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies reported zBMI at long-term follow-up. Activity interventions may have little to no effect on serious adverse events, but the evidence is very uncertain (2 studies, 773 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One study found no harms related to the intervention, and one study reported no difference in accident and infection rates between groups. Combined dietary/activity interventions versus control Combined dietary/activity interventions may have little to no effect on BMI at short-term follow-up, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD -0.08, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.04; 13 studies, 3867 participants; very low-certainty evidence). They may result in little to no difference in BMI at medium-term follow-up (MD -0.05, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.08; 9 studies, 7016 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may result in a slight reduction in BMI at long-term follow-up (MD -0.20, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.01; 5 studies, 2074 participants; low-certainty evidence). Combined interventions may have little to no effect on zBMI at short-term follow-up (MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.01; 14 studies, 5518 participants), and may result in a slight reduction in zBMI at medium-term follow-up, but the evidence for both time frames is very uncertain (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.04; 15 studies; 11,043 participants). Combined interventions may result in a slight reduction in zBMI at long-term follow-up (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.13 to -0.01; 10 studies, 4693 participants; low-certainty evidence). Combined interventions may result in little to no difference in serious adverse events, but the evidence is very uncertain (4 studies, 1689 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One study reported that a parent fractured an ankle while roller-skating at a community centre; the remaining studies reported no adverse events.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>In early childhood, combined dietary/activity interventions may have very modest benefits on BMI and zBMI at long-term follow-up. When implemented alone, dietary or activity interventions may have little to no effect on BMI measures. Only six studies reported serious adverse events, with no serious harms resulting directly from the intervention, but the evidence is very uncertain.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This review was partly funded by the National Institute for Health Research, School for Public Health Research.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Protocol available: DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015326.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"6 ","pages":"CD015326"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD015326.pub2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Early childhood presents an important opportunity for obesity prevention, an international public health priority. Interventions aiming to prevent obesity typically promote healthy diets or activity levels (physical activity, sedentary behaviour), or both. There is uncertainty over which approaches are more effective. This is one of a suite of three reviews addressing interventions for preventing obesity in children, each focusing on different age groups up to 18 years. These reviews replace and update a 2019 Cochrane review on interventions for preventing obesity in children from birth to 18 years.

Objectives: To assess the effects of interventions that aimed to prevent obesity in children aged two to four years by changing dietary intake or activity levels, or both, on body mass index (BMI), BMI z-score (zBMI), BMI percentile, and serious adverse events.

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, six other databases, and two trial registers, together with reference checking, citation searching, and contact with study authors to identify eligible studies. The latest search date was 7 February 2023.

Eligibility criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in children aged two to four years, comparing dietary or activity interventions (or both combined) to prevent overweight or obesity versus no intervention, usual care, or another eligible intervention, in any setting. Studies had to measure outcomes at a minimum of 12 weeks post-baseline. There were no language restrictions.

Outcomes: Our outcomes were BMI, zBMI, BMI percentile, and serious adverse events.

Risk of bias: We used version 2 of the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2) to assess included RCTs.

Synthesis methods: Working independently, two authors screened studies, extracted data, and conducted risk of bias and GRADE assessments. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses stratified by type of intervention and follow-up duration.

Included studies: We included 67 studies (36,601 participants), with 56 studies (21,404 participants) pooled in the meta-analyses. Sixty-three studies were conducted in high-income countries. Study settings were split between childcare (26 studies; 39%), home (23 studies; 34%), and home plus childcare settings (10 studies; 15%). Few studies were conducted in the community (three studies; 5%) or healthcare settings (five studies; 7%). Most studies compared a combined dietary/activity intervention with a control group.

Synthesis of results: Dietary interventions versus control Dietary interventions may have little to no effect on BMI at short-term follow-up (mean difference (MD) 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.28 to 0.28; 1 study, 94 participants; low-certainty evidence). At medium- and long-term follow-up, dietary interventions may result in little to no difference in BMI. One study (103 participants; low-certainty evidence) reported no difference in BMI at medium-term follow-up, and one study (2238 participants; low-certainty evidence) found lower rates of overweight and obesity in the intervention group at long-term follow-up. Dietary interventions likely result in little to no difference in zBMI at short-term (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.19; 2 studies, 145 participants) and medium-term follow-up (MD -0.17, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.10; 1 study, 389 participants), both with moderate-certainty evidence. None of the included studies reported zBMI at long-term follow-up. None of the studies reported serious adverse events. Activity interventions versus control Activity interventions may have little to no effect on BMI at short-term follow-up, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD -0.10, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.08; 6 studies, 826 participants; very low-certainty evidence). They likely reduce BMI at medium-term follow-up (MD -0.70, 95% CI -1.09 to -0.31; 1 study, 567 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). None of the studies reported BMI at long-term follow-up. Activity interventions likely result in little to no difference in zBMI at short-term follow-up (MD -0.06, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.07; 3 studies, 635 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). They may result in little to no difference in zBMI at medium-term follow-up, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD -0.00, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.11; 4 studies, 1083 participants; very low-certainty evidence). None of the included studies reported zBMI at long-term follow-up. Activity interventions may have little to no effect on serious adverse events, but the evidence is very uncertain (2 studies, 773 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One study found no harms related to the intervention, and one study reported no difference in accident and infection rates between groups. Combined dietary/activity interventions versus control Combined dietary/activity interventions may have little to no effect on BMI at short-term follow-up, but the evidence is very uncertain (MD -0.08, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.04; 13 studies, 3867 participants; very low-certainty evidence). They may result in little to no difference in BMI at medium-term follow-up (MD -0.05, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.08; 9 studies, 7016 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may result in a slight reduction in BMI at long-term follow-up (MD -0.20, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.01; 5 studies, 2074 participants; low-certainty evidence). Combined interventions may have little to no effect on zBMI at short-term follow-up (MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.01; 14 studies, 5518 participants), and may result in a slight reduction in zBMI at medium-term follow-up, but the evidence for both time frames is very uncertain (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.04; 15 studies; 11,043 participants). Combined interventions may result in a slight reduction in zBMI at long-term follow-up (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.13 to -0.01; 10 studies, 4693 participants; low-certainty evidence). Combined interventions may result in little to no difference in serious adverse events, but the evidence is very uncertain (4 studies, 1689 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One study reported that a parent fractured an ankle while roller-skating at a community centre; the remaining studies reported no adverse events.

Authors' conclusions: In early childhood, combined dietary/activity interventions may have very modest benefits on BMI and zBMI at long-term follow-up. When implemented alone, dietary or activity interventions may have little to no effect on BMI measures. Only six studies reported serious adverse events, with no serious harms resulting directly from the intervention, but the evidence is very uncertain.

Funding: This review was partly funded by the National Institute for Health Research, School for Public Health Research.

Registration: Protocol available: DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015326.

预防2至4岁儿童肥胖的干预措施。
理由:幼儿期是预防肥胖的重要机会,这是国际公共卫生的重点。旨在预防肥胖的干预措施通常促进健康饮食或活动水平(身体活动、久坐行为),或两者兼而有之。对于哪种方法更有效,存在不确定性。这是针对预防儿童肥胖干预措施的三篇综述中的一篇,每一篇综述都侧重于18岁以下的不同年龄组。这些综述取代并更新了2019年Cochrane关于预防出生至18岁儿童肥胖干预措施的综述。目的:评估旨在通过改变饮食摄入或活动水平(或两者兼而有之)来预防2至4岁儿童肥胖的干预措施对体重指数(BMI)、BMI z-score (zBMI)、BMI百分位数和严重不良事件的影响。检索方法:我们检索了CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、其他6个数据库和2个试验注册库,同时进行了参考文献检查、引文检索和与研究作者的联系,以确定符合条件的研究。最近一次搜索日期是2023年2月7日。入选标准:我们纳入了2 - 4岁儿童的随机对照试验(RCTs),比较饮食或活动干预(或两者结合)预防超重或肥胖与不干预、常规护理或其他符合条件的干预,在任何环境下。研究必须在基线后至少12周测量结果。没有语言限制。结果:我们的结果是BMI、zBMI、BMI百分位数和严重不良事件。偏倚风险:我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2)的第2版来评估纳入的随机对照试验。综合方法:两位作者独立工作,筛选研究,提取数据,并进行偏倚风险和GRADE评估。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,按干预类型和随访时间分层。纳入的研究:我们纳入了67项研究(36601名受试者),其中56项研究(21404名受试者)纳入meta分析。在高收入国家进行了63项研究。研究环境分为儿童保育(26项研究;39%),家庭(23项研究;34%),以及家庭加儿童保育环境(10项研究;15%)。在社区中进行的研究很少(三项研究;5%)或医疗机构(5项研究;7%)。大多数研究将饮食/活动联合干预组与对照组进行了比较。在短期随访中,饮食干预可能对BMI影响很小或没有影响(平均差值(MD) 0.00, 95%可信区间(CI) -0.28 ~ 0.28;1项研究,94名参与者;确定性的证据)。在中期和长期随访中,饮食干预可能导致BMI几乎没有差异。一项研究(103名参与者;低确定性证据)报告在中期随访时BMI无差异,一项研究(2238名参与者;低确定性证据)在长期随访中发现干预组的超重和肥胖发生率较低。饮食干预可能导致zBMI在短期内几乎没有差异(MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.13至0.19;2项研究,145名受试者)和中期随访(MD -0.17, 95% CI -0.44 ~ 0.10;1项研究,389名参与者),均有中等确定性证据。在长期随访中,没有纳入的研究报告bmi为0。没有研究报告严重的不良事件。在短期随访中,活动干预对BMI的影响可能很小或没有影响,但证据非常不确定(MD -0.10, 95% CI -0.28 ~ 0.08;6项研究,826名参与者;非常低确定性证据)。中期随访时,他们可能会降低BMI (MD -0.70, 95% CI -1.09至-0.31;1项研究,567名参与者;moderate-certainty证据)。没有一项研究报告了长期随访时的BMI。在短期随访中,活动干预可能导致zBMI几乎没有差异(MD -0.06, 95% CI -0.19至0.07;3项研究,635名参与者;moderate-certainty证据)。在中期随访时,它们可能导致zBMI几乎没有差异,但证据非常不确定(MD -0.00, 95% CI -0.12至0.11;4项研究,1083名受试者;非常低确定性证据)。在长期随访中,没有纳入的研究报告bmi为0。活动干预可能对严重不良事件影响很小或没有影响,但证据非常不确定(2项研究,773名参与者;非常低确定性证据)。一项研究没有发现与干预有关的危害,一项研究报告两组之间的事故和感染率没有差异。在短期随访中,饮食/活动联合干预可能对BMI几乎没有影响,但证据非常不确定(MD -0.08, 95% CI -0.20 ~ 0.04;13项研究,3867名受试者;非常低确定性证据)。 中期随访时,它们可能导致BMI差异很小或没有差异(MD -0.05, 95% CI -0.18 ~ 0.08;9项研究,7016名受试者;低确定性证据),并可能导致长期随访时BMI略有下降(MD -0.20, 95% CI -0.39至-0.01;5项研究,2074名受试者;确定性的证据)。在短期随访中,联合干预可能对zBMI几乎没有影响(MD -0.03, 95% CI -0.07至0.01;14项研究,5518名参与者),并可能导致中期随访时zBMI略有降低,但两个时间框架的证据都非常不确定(MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.11至-0.04;15研究;11043名参与者)。在长期随访中,联合干预可能导致zBMI略有下降(MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.13至-0.01;10项研究,4693名受试者;确定性的证据)。联合干预可能导致严重不良事件的差异很小或没有差异,但证据非常不确定(4项研究,1689名参与者;非常低确定性证据)。一项研究报告称,一位家长在社区中心滑旱冰时脚踝骨折;其余研究未报告不良事件。作者的结论是:在儿童早期,在长期随访中,饮食/活动联合干预可能对BMI和zBMI有非常有限的益处。当单独实施时,饮食或活动干预可能对BMI测量几乎没有影响。只有6项研究报告了严重的不良事件,没有直接由干预引起的严重危害,但证据非常不确定。经费:本综述部分由国家卫生研究所公共卫生研究学院资助。注册:可用协议:DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015326。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信