Risk of Mortality From Esophageal Cancer Among US Poultry Workers, 1950−2019

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Leanna Delhey, Christina Joshua, Jaimi L. Allen, Robert Delongchamp, Benjamin C. Amick, Wendy Nembhard
{"title":"Risk of Mortality From Esophageal Cancer Among US Poultry Workers, 1950−2019","authors":"Leanna Delhey,&nbsp;Christina Joshua,&nbsp;Jaimi L. Allen,&nbsp;Robert Delongchamp,&nbsp;Benjamin C. Amick,&nbsp;Wendy Nembhard","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>While research suggests poultry industry workers have an increased risk of cancer mortality, little is known about their risk of esophageal cancer mortality. We investigated the association between working with poultry and esophageal cancer mortality while concurrently investigating other occupational and nonoccupational risk factors amongst poultry industry workers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a case-cohort analysis from a cohort of unionized workers in the United States (<i>N</i> = 46,816) and conducted follow-up for mortality from 1950 to 2019 with the National Death Index. Cases were those who died of esophageal cancer and a sub-cohort was randomly selected (<i>N</i> = 2666) for further analysis. We interviewed participants and relatives about their work and personal life. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the hazard of esophageal cancer mortality due to working with poultry among the full cohort and weighted regression for the sub-cohort and those interviewed. We conducted exploratory analyses to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each interview question, adjusted for confounders, and computed a false discovery rate (FDR).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the full and sub-cohort, working in a poultry plant was associated with an increased hazard of esophageal cancer mortality (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.05, 2.50; and HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.03, 2.65, respectively). Among survey respondents, working in a poultry plant appeared to decrease the risk of esophageal cancer mortality (HR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.34, 1.35).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Working in poultry plants may increase the risk of death from esophageal cancer, but further research is needed to validate these findings and explore potential mechanisms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 8","pages":"711-723"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23742","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.23742","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

While research suggests poultry industry workers have an increased risk of cancer mortality, little is known about their risk of esophageal cancer mortality. We investigated the association between working with poultry and esophageal cancer mortality while concurrently investigating other occupational and nonoccupational risk factors amongst poultry industry workers.

Methods

We conducted a case-cohort analysis from a cohort of unionized workers in the United States (N = 46,816) and conducted follow-up for mortality from 1950 to 2019 with the National Death Index. Cases were those who died of esophageal cancer and a sub-cohort was randomly selected (N = 2666) for further analysis. We interviewed participants and relatives about their work and personal life. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the hazard of esophageal cancer mortality due to working with poultry among the full cohort and weighted regression for the sub-cohort and those interviewed. We conducted exploratory analyses to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each interview question, adjusted for confounders, and computed a false discovery rate (FDR).

Results

In the full and sub-cohort, working in a poultry plant was associated with an increased hazard of esophageal cancer mortality (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.05, 2.50; and HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.03, 2.65, respectively). Among survey respondents, working in a poultry plant appeared to decrease the risk of esophageal cancer mortality (HR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.34, 1.35).

Conclusions

Working in poultry plants may increase the risk of death from esophageal cancer, but further research is needed to validate these findings and explore potential mechanisms.

Abstract Image

1950-2019年美国家禽工人食道癌死亡风险
背景:虽然研究表明家禽业工人患癌症死亡的风险增加,但对他们患食道癌死亡的风险知之甚少。我们调查了与家禽工作与食管癌死亡率之间的关系,同时调查了家禽业工人中其他职业和非职业风险因素。方法:我们对美国工会工人队列(N = 46,816)进行了病例队列分析,并使用国家死亡指数对1950年至2019年的死亡率进行了随访。病例为死于食管癌的患者,随机选择一个亚队列(N = 2666)进行进一步分析。我们采访了参与者及其亲属,了解他们的工作和个人生活。我们使用多变量Cox比例风险回归来估计全队列中与家禽一起工作的食管癌死亡率的风险,并对亚队列和受访者进行加权回归。我们进行了探索性分析,以估计每个面试问题的风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI),调整了混杂因素,并计算了错误发现率(FDR)。结果:在全队列和亚队列中,在家禽厂工作与食管癌死亡率增加相关(HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.05, 2.50;HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.03, 2.65)。在调查对象中,在家禽加工厂工作似乎降低了食管癌死亡的风险(HR = 0.67;95% ci = 0.34, 1.35)。结论:在家禽工厂工作可能会增加食管癌死亡的风险,但需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现并探索潜在的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信