{"title":"A Work Systems Hierarchy of Controls: Analysis of Risk Controls Developed by Paramedics","authors":"Karen Davies, Victoria Weale, Jodi Oakman","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The hierarchy of control (HOC) is a fundamental construct in work health and safety practice and central for employers to manage risk to the health and safety of workers in Australia, to fulfil their legal obligations. The current HOC has been identified as more effective for developing risk controls for physical hazards than for psychosocial hazards.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To address this limitation, this study involved development and testing of a more comprehensive hierarchy of risk control. The work systems hierarchy of control (WS-HOC) includes three hierarchical levels; elimination, re-design of systems and individual actions. Non-hierarchical categories within levels were developed to distinguish different risk control options, suitable for both physical and psychosocial hazards. Using the WS-HOC, risk controls developed by paramedics to address physical and psychosocial hazards associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders were analyzed. These risk controls were developed using the APHIRM (A Participative Hazard Identification and Risk Management) toolkit in an ambulance service.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The WS-HOC provided a single, contemporary, nuanced approach to evaluating the risk controls for paramedics and their likely effectiveness, regardless of the type of hazard.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This novel approach provides an alternative to previous attempts at supplementing the HOC to improve its application to psychosocial hazards. Further evaluation is required by both practitioners and researchers to examine its utility for other, different occupations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 8","pages":"698-710"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23741","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.23741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The hierarchy of control (HOC) is a fundamental construct in work health and safety practice and central for employers to manage risk to the health and safety of workers in Australia, to fulfil their legal obligations. The current HOC has been identified as more effective for developing risk controls for physical hazards than for psychosocial hazards.
Methods
To address this limitation, this study involved development and testing of a more comprehensive hierarchy of risk control. The work systems hierarchy of control (WS-HOC) includes three hierarchical levels; elimination, re-design of systems and individual actions. Non-hierarchical categories within levels were developed to distinguish different risk control options, suitable for both physical and psychosocial hazards. Using the WS-HOC, risk controls developed by paramedics to address physical and psychosocial hazards associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders were analyzed. These risk controls were developed using the APHIRM (A Participative Hazard Identification and Risk Management) toolkit in an ambulance service.
Results
The WS-HOC provided a single, contemporary, nuanced approach to evaluating the risk controls for paramedics and their likely effectiveness, regardless of the type of hazard.
Conclusions
This novel approach provides an alternative to previous attempts at supplementing the HOC to improve its application to psychosocial hazards. Further evaluation is required by both practitioners and researchers to examine its utility for other, different occupations.
期刊介绍:
American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.