Biologic Mechanisms Underlying the Heterogeneous Response to Tight Glycemic Control among Differentially Inflamed Patients in the HALF-PINT Trial.

IF 19.4 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Matt S Zinter, Clove S Taylor, Daniela Markovic, Matteo Pellegrini, Kayley Wong, Brunilda Balliu, Kinisha P Gala, Lisa A Asaro, Vinay M Nadkarni, Patrick S McQuillen, Sitaram S Vangala, Pratik Sinha, Michael A Matthay, Michael S D Agus, Anil Sapru
{"title":"Biologic Mechanisms Underlying the Heterogeneous Response to Tight Glycemic Control among Differentially Inflamed Patients in the HALF-PINT Trial.","authors":"Matt S Zinter, Clove S Taylor, Daniela Markovic, Matteo Pellegrini, Kayley Wong, Brunilda Balliu, Kinisha P Gala, Lisa A Asaro, Vinay M Nadkarni, Patrick S McQuillen, Sitaram S Vangala, Pratik Sinha, Michael A Matthay, Michael S D Agus, Anil Sapru","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202409-1719OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Tight glycemic control with insulin (TGC) has not consistently shown benefit in critically ill patients. We previously reported that the subset of children with a hyperinflammatory subphenotype benefitted from TGC in the HALF-PINT study of hyperglycemic children with heart and lung failure and the IIT-SBPP study in severely burned pediatric patients. However, whether this effect was mediated through a reduction in inflammation or some other biological process is not fully understood.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To deepen the understanding of inflammatory subphenotypes and explore the biological mechanisms underlying heterogeneous response to TGC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plasma cytokine measurements and whole blood transcriptomics from 740 blood samples collected on pre- and post- treatment study days 0, 2, and 4 from 293 HALF-PINT participants (n=250 hypoinflammatory and n=43 hyperinflammatory) were used to identify cytokine and gene expression signatures of differential responses to TGC.</p><p><strong>Measurements and results: </strong>Patients with hyperinflammatory subphenotype had greater baseline expression of genes relating to inflammation, cell cycle activity, and immunometabolism. Hyperinflammatory patients treated to a target glucose range of 80-110 mg/dL experienced greater reduction in inflammatory cytokines, innate immune gene expression, and heme metabolism gene expression, as well as an increase in lymphocyte gene expression, compared to those treated to a target range of 150-180 mg/dL. Causal mediation testing indicated that these changes partly explained the observed mortality benefit of TGC in the hyperinflammatory subgroup of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings expand our understanding of the biology underlying inflammatory subphenotypes, and provide biological insight into the mortality benefit of TGC in hyperinflammatory children.</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202409-1719OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Tight glycemic control with insulin (TGC) has not consistently shown benefit in critically ill patients. We previously reported that the subset of children with a hyperinflammatory subphenotype benefitted from TGC in the HALF-PINT study of hyperglycemic children with heart and lung failure and the IIT-SBPP study in severely burned pediatric patients. However, whether this effect was mediated through a reduction in inflammation or some other biological process is not fully understood.

Objectives: To deepen the understanding of inflammatory subphenotypes and explore the biological mechanisms underlying heterogeneous response to TGC.

Methods: Plasma cytokine measurements and whole blood transcriptomics from 740 blood samples collected on pre- and post- treatment study days 0, 2, and 4 from 293 HALF-PINT participants (n=250 hypoinflammatory and n=43 hyperinflammatory) were used to identify cytokine and gene expression signatures of differential responses to TGC.

Measurements and results: Patients with hyperinflammatory subphenotype had greater baseline expression of genes relating to inflammation, cell cycle activity, and immunometabolism. Hyperinflammatory patients treated to a target glucose range of 80-110 mg/dL experienced greater reduction in inflammatory cytokines, innate immune gene expression, and heme metabolism gene expression, as well as an increase in lymphocyte gene expression, compared to those treated to a target range of 150-180 mg/dL. Causal mediation testing indicated that these changes partly explained the observed mortality benefit of TGC in the hyperinflammatory subgroup of patients.

Conclusions: These findings expand our understanding of the biology underlying inflammatory subphenotypes, and provide biological insight into the mortality benefit of TGC in hyperinflammatory children.

半品脱试验中不同炎症患者对严格血糖控制的异质反应的生物学机制
理由:用胰岛素严格控制血糖(TGC)在危重患者中并没有一贯显示出益处。我们之前报道过,在患有心力衰竭的高血糖儿童的HALF-PINT研究和严重烧伤儿科患者的IIT-SBPP研究中,高炎症亚表型儿童亚群受益于TGC。然而,这种作用是通过减少炎症还是其他一些生物过程介导的,目前还不完全清楚。目的:加深对炎症亚表型的认识,探索TGC异质反应的生物学机制。方法:在治疗前和治疗后的第0、2和4天,从293名半品脱参与者(n=250名低炎症和n=43名高炎症)中收集740份血液样本,使用血浆细胞因子测量和全血转录组学来鉴定对TGC的差异反应的细胞因子和基因表达特征。测量和结果:高炎症亚表型患者具有更高的炎症、细胞周期活性和免疫代谢相关基因的基线表达。与目标葡萄糖浓度为150-180 mg/dL的患者相比,治疗至80-110 mg/dL的高炎症患者炎症因子、先天免疫基因表达和血红素代谢基因表达的减少幅度更大,淋巴细胞基因表达的增加幅度也更大。因果中介检验表明,这些变化部分解释了TGC在高炎症亚组患者中观察到的死亡率降低。结论:这些发现扩大了我们对炎症亚表型生物学基础的理解,并为TGC在高炎症儿童中的死亡率益处提供了生物学见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信