Patterns and Disparities in Met Needs in Community Mental Health Services: Exploring the Utility of the Ontario Modified Met Needs Index.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Frank Sirotich, Kamalpreet Rakhra, Jerome Iruthayarajah, Janet Durbin, Ravi Menezes, Lin Fang, Jennifer Zosky
{"title":"Patterns and Disparities in Met Needs in Community Mental Health Services: Exploring the Utility of the Ontario Modified Met Needs Index.","authors":"Frank Sirotich, Kamalpreet Rakhra, Jerome Iruthayarajah, Janet Durbin, Ravi Menezes, Lin Fang, Jennifer Zosky","doi":"10.1007/s10488-025-01456-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing client needs is integral to improving outcomes in community mental health services, yet tools to evaluate the extent to which needs are met remain underutilized. This study examines patterns of met needs and disparities across sociodemographic groups using the Ontario Common Assessment of Need (OCAN), a standardized tool adapted from the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) and widely implemented in Ontario, Canada. Specifically, we applied the Ontario Modified Met Needs Index (OMMNI), a ratio-based metric, to measure the extent to which identified needs were addressed over the course of care. Using longitudinal OCAN data from 4,537 clients engaged in assertive community treatment, case management, early psychosis intervention, and supportive housing programs, we calculated OMMNI scores based on both staff- and client-completed assessments. Results showed that 74% of staff-identified needs and 72% of client-identified needs were met or remained met. At the domain level, safety-related needs had the highest rates of being met (≥ 85%), while sexual expression, intimate relationships, company, daytime activities and psychological distress were least consistently addressed (< 70%). Disparities in staff assessments were observed for younger clients and those with unspecified service languages, while disparities in client assessments were noted for clients identifying as transgender or non-binary. These findings underscore variability in addressing diverse client needs, highlighting opportunities to enhance person-centered care. The OMMNI holds potential as a practical tool for measuring met needs, identifying disparities, informing service planning, and supporting quality improvement. Further validation is needed to ensure its applicability across populations and service contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-025-01456-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing client needs is integral to improving outcomes in community mental health services, yet tools to evaluate the extent to which needs are met remain underutilized. This study examines patterns of met needs and disparities across sociodemographic groups using the Ontario Common Assessment of Need (OCAN), a standardized tool adapted from the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) and widely implemented in Ontario, Canada. Specifically, we applied the Ontario Modified Met Needs Index (OMMNI), a ratio-based metric, to measure the extent to which identified needs were addressed over the course of care. Using longitudinal OCAN data from 4,537 clients engaged in assertive community treatment, case management, early psychosis intervention, and supportive housing programs, we calculated OMMNI scores based on both staff- and client-completed assessments. Results showed that 74% of staff-identified needs and 72% of client-identified needs were met or remained met. At the domain level, safety-related needs had the highest rates of being met (≥ 85%), while sexual expression, intimate relationships, company, daytime activities and psychological distress were least consistently addressed (< 70%). Disparities in staff assessments were observed for younger clients and those with unspecified service languages, while disparities in client assessments were noted for clients identifying as transgender or non-binary. These findings underscore variability in addressing diverse client needs, highlighting opportunities to enhance person-centered care. The OMMNI holds potential as a practical tool for measuring met needs, identifying disparities, informing service planning, and supporting quality improvement. Further validation is needed to ensure its applicability across populations and service contexts.

社区精神卫生服务中满足需求的模式和差异:安大略省修正满足需求指数的效用探索。
评估客户需求是改善社区精神卫生服务成果不可或缺的一部分,但评估需求得到满足程度的工具仍未得到充分利用。本研究使用安大略省共同需求评估(OCAN)检查了满足需求的模式和社会人口群体之间的差异,这是一种标准化工具,改编自坎伯韦尔需求评估(CAN),并在加拿大安大略省广泛实施。具体来说,我们应用了安大略省修正满足需求指数(OMMNI),一个基于比率的度量,来衡量在护理过程中确定的需求被解决的程度。利用来自4,537名参与果断社区治疗、病例管理、早期精神病干预和支持性住房项目的客户的纵向OCAN数据,我们根据工作人员和客户完成的评估计算了OMMNI分数。结果显示,74%的员工确定的需求和72%的客户确定的需求得到满足或保持满足。在领域层面,安全相关需求的满足率最高(≥85%),而性表达、亲密关系、陪伴、日间活动和心理困扰的满足率最低(
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信