Frank Sirotich, Kamalpreet Rakhra, Jerome Iruthayarajah, Janet Durbin, Ravi Menezes, Lin Fang, Jennifer Zosky
{"title":"Patterns and Disparities in Met Needs in Community Mental Health Services: Exploring the Utility of the Ontario Modified Met Needs Index.","authors":"Frank Sirotich, Kamalpreet Rakhra, Jerome Iruthayarajah, Janet Durbin, Ravi Menezes, Lin Fang, Jennifer Zosky","doi":"10.1007/s10488-025-01456-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessing client needs is integral to improving outcomes in community mental health services, yet tools to evaluate the extent to which needs are met remain underutilized. This study examines patterns of met needs and disparities across sociodemographic groups using the Ontario Common Assessment of Need (OCAN), a standardized tool adapted from the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) and widely implemented in Ontario, Canada. Specifically, we applied the Ontario Modified Met Needs Index (OMMNI), a ratio-based metric, to measure the extent to which identified needs were addressed over the course of care. Using longitudinal OCAN data from 4,537 clients engaged in assertive community treatment, case management, early psychosis intervention, and supportive housing programs, we calculated OMMNI scores based on both staff- and client-completed assessments. Results showed that 74% of staff-identified needs and 72% of client-identified needs were met or remained met. At the domain level, safety-related needs had the highest rates of being met (≥ 85%), while sexual expression, intimate relationships, company, daytime activities and psychological distress were least consistently addressed (< 70%). Disparities in staff assessments were observed for younger clients and those with unspecified service languages, while disparities in client assessments were noted for clients identifying as transgender or non-binary. These findings underscore variability in addressing diverse client needs, highlighting opportunities to enhance person-centered care. The OMMNI holds potential as a practical tool for measuring met needs, identifying disparities, informing service planning, and supporting quality improvement. Further validation is needed to ensure its applicability across populations and service contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-025-01456-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Assessing client needs is integral to improving outcomes in community mental health services, yet tools to evaluate the extent to which needs are met remain underutilized. This study examines patterns of met needs and disparities across sociodemographic groups using the Ontario Common Assessment of Need (OCAN), a standardized tool adapted from the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN) and widely implemented in Ontario, Canada. Specifically, we applied the Ontario Modified Met Needs Index (OMMNI), a ratio-based metric, to measure the extent to which identified needs were addressed over the course of care. Using longitudinal OCAN data from 4,537 clients engaged in assertive community treatment, case management, early psychosis intervention, and supportive housing programs, we calculated OMMNI scores based on both staff- and client-completed assessments. Results showed that 74% of staff-identified needs and 72% of client-identified needs were met or remained met. At the domain level, safety-related needs had the highest rates of being met (≥ 85%), while sexual expression, intimate relationships, company, daytime activities and psychological distress were least consistently addressed (< 70%). Disparities in staff assessments were observed for younger clients and those with unspecified service languages, while disparities in client assessments were noted for clients identifying as transgender or non-binary. These findings underscore variability in addressing diverse client needs, highlighting opportunities to enhance person-centered care. The OMMNI holds potential as a practical tool for measuring met needs, identifying disparities, informing service planning, and supporting quality improvement. Further validation is needed to ensure its applicability across populations and service contexts.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles. The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues. The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like. Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.