Thi Hien Trang Chau, Elise Bannier, Edouard Bardou-Jacquet, Yves Gandon
{"title":"Liver R2* threshold to predict the failure of MR elastography at 3T: SE-EPI versus GRE sequences.","authors":"Thi Hien Trang Chau, Elise Bannier, Edouard Bardou-Jacquet, Yves Gandon","doi":"10.1177/02841851251344464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundLiver iron overload is the most common cause of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) failure.PurposeTo determine a threshold of R2*, a surrogate of liver iron concentration (LIC), which predicts the failure of liver MRE for either 2D gradient-recalled echo (GRE) or spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MRE sequence at 3 T.Material and MethodsThis single-center retrospective study included 247 patients who underwent GRE MRE, SE-EPI MRE sequences for fibrosis evaluation and 2D multi-echo GRE sequence for R2* quantification using MRQuantif software. The ability of R2* to predict the failed MRE related to liver iron accumulation was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsAfter excluding 26 exams for technical failure, we evaluated 221 patients (52 women; mean age = 56 ± 13) with R2* values in the range of 37-1665 s<sup>-1</sup>. The iron-related failure rates of GRE MRE and SE-EPI MRE were 62.9% (139/221) and 10.0% (22/221), respectively. The best cutoff of R2* to predict failure exam due to liver iron deposition with GRE MRE was 101 s<sup>-1</sup> with a sensitivity of 79.1% and specificity of 97.6% (AUC = 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95-0.99). This cutoff for SE-EPI MRE was 289 s<sup>-1</sup> with a sensitivity of 82.8% and specificity of 99.5% (AUC = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.78-1).ConclusionLiver R2* is a good predictor of MRE examination failure related to iron deposition for MRE at 3 T.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851251344464"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251344464","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundLiver iron overload is the most common cause of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) failure.PurposeTo determine a threshold of R2*, a surrogate of liver iron concentration (LIC), which predicts the failure of liver MRE for either 2D gradient-recalled echo (GRE) or spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MRE sequence at 3 T.Material and MethodsThis single-center retrospective study included 247 patients who underwent GRE MRE, SE-EPI MRE sequences for fibrosis evaluation and 2D multi-echo GRE sequence for R2* quantification using MRQuantif software. The ability of R2* to predict the failed MRE related to liver iron accumulation was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).ResultsAfter excluding 26 exams for technical failure, we evaluated 221 patients (52 women; mean age = 56 ± 13) with R2* values in the range of 37-1665 s-1. The iron-related failure rates of GRE MRE and SE-EPI MRE were 62.9% (139/221) and 10.0% (22/221), respectively. The best cutoff of R2* to predict failure exam due to liver iron deposition with GRE MRE was 101 s-1 with a sensitivity of 79.1% and specificity of 97.6% (AUC = 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95-0.99). This cutoff for SE-EPI MRE was 289 s-1 with a sensitivity of 82.8% and specificity of 99.5% (AUC = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.78-1).ConclusionLiver R2* is a good predictor of MRE examination failure related to iron deposition for MRE at 3 T.
期刊介绍:
Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.