{"title":"A conceptual framework for conserving giant panda habitat: restoration and connectivity.","authors":"Biao Yang, Weirui Qin, Mingxia Fu, Yu Xu, Lifeng Zhu, Han Pan, Zhangmin Chen, Qiang Dai, Zhisong Yang, Xiaodong Gu, Yuhong Fan, Xiling Xiong, Tao Ruan, Zejun Zhang","doi":"10.1111/brv.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>China's conservation initiatives for the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) over the past three decades have yielded remarkable success, transforming the species from a symbol of endangered wildlife to a conservation triumph. As wild populations recover and the Giant Panda National Park is established, the focus of conservation has shifted from basic ecological studies to the more complex challenges of restoring ecologically functional forests, mitigating habitat fragmentation, and integrating broader ecosystem conservation efforts. To sustain and build on these successes, our analysis delves into the anthropogenic drivers of habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation within giant panda habitats. We document the transformations these habitats have undergone, categorizing the outcomes into eight distinct types: bare lands, residential areas, roads, farmlands, shrub-grasslands, bamboo thickets, secondary forests, and monoculture plantations. These outcomes are shaped by a combination of natural disturbances and both direct and indirect human activities. We propose eight policy recommendations for habitat restoration, tailored to the specific context of habitat loss, fragmentation, or degradation. These include restricting infrastructure development, converting agricultural lands to suitable habitats, reducing human disturbances, eliminating grazing, applying conservation education and ecological compensation, establishing habitat corridors, promoting natural habitat regeneration, and implementing technical habitat restoration interventions. Particularly in enhancing technical restoration efforts, we outline strategies focused on restoring community function and ensuring effective implementation, supported by a pilot study that introduced optimized restoration strategies, and followed-up monitoring using species diversity, community structure, and ecological processes to evaluate the success of restoration efforts. Finally, we highlight key areas of research necessary to deepen our understanding and inform future management strategies. This comprehensive framework underscores both the theoretical foundations and practical approaches to giant panda habitat conservation, addressing not only immediate concerns but also opportunities to protect other sympatric species. The broader implications of this review extend to the conservation of large mammals and their ecosystems globally, providing valuable insights for conservation practitioners and policymakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
China's conservation initiatives for the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) over the past three decades have yielded remarkable success, transforming the species from a symbol of endangered wildlife to a conservation triumph. As wild populations recover and the Giant Panda National Park is established, the focus of conservation has shifted from basic ecological studies to the more complex challenges of restoring ecologically functional forests, mitigating habitat fragmentation, and integrating broader ecosystem conservation efforts. To sustain and build on these successes, our analysis delves into the anthropogenic drivers of habitat loss, fragmentation, and degradation within giant panda habitats. We document the transformations these habitats have undergone, categorizing the outcomes into eight distinct types: bare lands, residential areas, roads, farmlands, shrub-grasslands, bamboo thickets, secondary forests, and monoculture plantations. These outcomes are shaped by a combination of natural disturbances and both direct and indirect human activities. We propose eight policy recommendations for habitat restoration, tailored to the specific context of habitat loss, fragmentation, or degradation. These include restricting infrastructure development, converting agricultural lands to suitable habitats, reducing human disturbances, eliminating grazing, applying conservation education and ecological compensation, establishing habitat corridors, promoting natural habitat regeneration, and implementing technical habitat restoration interventions. Particularly in enhancing technical restoration efforts, we outline strategies focused on restoring community function and ensuring effective implementation, supported by a pilot study that introduced optimized restoration strategies, and followed-up monitoring using species diversity, community structure, and ecological processes to evaluate the success of restoration efforts. Finally, we highlight key areas of research necessary to deepen our understanding and inform future management strategies. This comprehensive framework underscores both the theoretical foundations and practical approaches to giant panda habitat conservation, addressing not only immediate concerns but also opportunities to protect other sympatric species. The broader implications of this review extend to the conservation of large mammals and their ecosystems globally, providing valuable insights for conservation practitioners and policymakers.
期刊介绍:
Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly.
The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions.
The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field.
Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.