A New Inverse Probability of Selection Weighted Cox Model to Deal With Outcome-Dependent Sampling in Survival Analysis

IF 1.3 3区 生物学 Q4 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Vera H. Arntzen, Marta Fiocco, Inge M. M. Lakeman, Maartje Nielsen, Mar Rodríguez-Girondo
{"title":"A New Inverse Probability of Selection Weighted Cox Model to Deal With Outcome-Dependent Sampling in Survival Analysis","authors":"Vera H. Arntzen,&nbsp;Marta Fiocco,&nbsp;Inge M. M. Lakeman,&nbsp;Maartje Nielsen,&nbsp;Mar Rodríguez-Girondo","doi":"10.1002/bimj.70056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Motivated by the study of genetic effect modifiers of cancer, we examined weighting approaches to correct for ascertainment bias in survival analysis. Outcome-dependent sampling is common in genetic epidemiology leading to study samples with too many events in comparison to the population and an overrepresentation of young, affected subjects. A usual approach to correct for ascertainment bias in this setting is to use an inverse probability-weighted Cox model, using weights based on external available population-based age-specific incidence rates of the type of cancer under investigation. However, the current approach is not general enough leading to invalid weights in relevant practical settings if oversampling of cases is not observed in all age groups. Based on the same principle of weighting observations by their inverse probability of selection, we propose a new, more general approach, called the generalized weighted approach. We show the advantage of the new generalized weighted cohort method using simulations and two real data sets. In both applications, the goal is to assess the association between common susceptibility loci identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and cancer (colorectal and breast) using data collected through genetic testing in clinical genetics centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55360,"journal":{"name":"Biometrical Journal","volume":"67 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bimj.70056","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.70056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Motivated by the study of genetic effect modifiers of cancer, we examined weighting approaches to correct for ascertainment bias in survival analysis. Outcome-dependent sampling is common in genetic epidemiology leading to study samples with too many events in comparison to the population and an overrepresentation of young, affected subjects. A usual approach to correct for ascertainment bias in this setting is to use an inverse probability-weighted Cox model, using weights based on external available population-based age-specific incidence rates of the type of cancer under investigation. However, the current approach is not general enough leading to invalid weights in relevant practical settings if oversampling of cases is not observed in all age groups. Based on the same principle of weighting observations by their inverse probability of selection, we propose a new, more general approach, called the generalized weighted approach. We show the advantage of the new generalized weighted cohort method using simulations and two real data sets. In both applications, the goal is to assess the association between common susceptibility loci identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and cancer (colorectal and breast) using data collected through genetic testing in clinical genetics centers.

生存分析中基于结果相关抽样的一种新的逆选择概率加权Cox模型
受癌症遗传效应修饰因子研究的启发,我们研究了加权方法来纠正生存分析中的确定偏差。结果依赖抽样在遗传流行病学中很常见,导致研究样本与总体相比事件过多,并且年轻受影响对象的代表性过高。在这种情况下,纠正确定偏差的常用方法是使用逆概率加权Cox模型,使用基于外部可用的基于人群的年龄特异性癌症类型发病率的权重。然而,目前的方法不够普遍,如果在所有年龄组中没有观察到病例的过采样,则会导致相关实际设置中的无效权重。基于同样的原则,加权观察他们的逆选择概率,我们提出了一个新的,更一般的方法,称为广义加权方法。我们通过模拟和两个真实数据集证明了这种新的广义加权队列方法的优越性。在这两项应用中,目标都是利用临床遗传学中心通过基因检测收集的数据,评估全基因组关联研究(GWAS)中发现的常见易感位点与癌症(结直肠癌和乳腺癌)之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biometrical Journal
Biometrical Journal 生物-数学与计算生物学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biometrical Journal publishes papers on statistical methods and their applications in life sciences including medicine, environmental sciences and agriculture. Methodological developments should be motivated by an interesting and relevant problem from these areas. Ideally the manuscript should include a description of the problem and a section detailing the application of the new methodology to the problem. Case studies, review articles and letters to the editors are also welcome. Papers containing only extensive mathematical theory are not suitable for publication in Biometrical Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信