Tailoring anxiety assessment for Parkinson's disease: The Chinese Parkinson anxiety scale with cultural and situational anxiety considerations

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Shu-Fai Poon , Chun-Hsiang Tan , Wei-Pin Hong , Kao Chin Chen , Rwei-Ling Yu
{"title":"Tailoring anxiety assessment for Parkinson's disease: The Chinese Parkinson anxiety scale with cultural and situational anxiety considerations","authors":"Shu-Fai Poon ,&nbsp;Chun-Hsiang Tan ,&nbsp;Wei-Pin Hong ,&nbsp;Kao Chin Chen ,&nbsp;Rwei-Ling Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recognizing the gap in mental health assessment, particularly in evaluating anxiety among Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, with an emphasis on cultural context and PD-specific situational anxiety. This study aimed to refine the Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS) and emphasized the importance of health equity by addressing cultural context and PD-specific situational anxiety. The revised version, named the Chinese Parkinson Anxiety Scale (CPAS), was developed to include PD-specific situational anxiety and culturally relevant items, addressing the unique challenges faced by the Eastern PD population. The CPAS was designed to reflect Eastern cultural nuances and PD-specific anxiety factors. Involving 138 PD patients and 122 healthy controls, the study assessed participants using the CPAS, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale. The scale's reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (i.e., construct, concurrent, convergent, and discriminate validity) were rigorously evaluated. The CPAS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.954) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.77). It showed significant concurrent validity, evidenced by notable differences between PD patients and healthy controls. The scale also exhibited convergent solid validity with the BAI (r = 0.585; p &lt; 0.001) and acceptable discriminant validity with the ADL (r = −0.086; p = 0.166). The inclusion of PD situational anxiety items was a key addition, showing a more significant impact on PD patients than the original scale factors. With its robust psychometric properties and culturally sensitive approach, the CPAS emerges as a comprehensive tool for assessing anxiety in the Chinese PD population, advancing both clinical care and health equity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"381 ","pages":"Article 118284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027795362500615X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recognizing the gap in mental health assessment, particularly in evaluating anxiety among Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, with an emphasis on cultural context and PD-specific situational anxiety. This study aimed to refine the Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS) and emphasized the importance of health equity by addressing cultural context and PD-specific situational anxiety. The revised version, named the Chinese Parkinson Anxiety Scale (CPAS), was developed to include PD-specific situational anxiety and culturally relevant items, addressing the unique challenges faced by the Eastern PD population. The CPAS was designed to reflect Eastern cultural nuances and PD-specific anxiety factors. Involving 138 PD patients and 122 healthy controls, the study assessed participants using the CPAS, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale. The scale's reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and validity (i.e., construct, concurrent, convergent, and discriminate validity) were rigorously evaluated. The CPAS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.954) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.77). It showed significant concurrent validity, evidenced by notable differences between PD patients and healthy controls. The scale also exhibited convergent solid validity with the BAI (r = 0.585; p < 0.001) and acceptable discriminant validity with the ADL (r = −0.086; p = 0.166). The inclusion of PD situational anxiety items was a key addition, showing a more significant impact on PD patients than the original scale factors. With its robust psychometric properties and culturally sensitive approach, the CPAS emerges as a comprehensive tool for assessing anxiety in the Chinese PD population, advancing both clinical care and health equity.
帕金森病的定制焦虑评估:中国帕金森焦虑量表与文化和情境焦虑的考虑
认识到心理健康评估的差距,特别是评估帕金森病(PD)患者的焦虑,重点是文化背景和PD特异性情境焦虑。本研究旨在完善帕金森焦虑量表(PAS),并通过处理文化背景和pd特定情境焦虑来强调健康公平的重要性。修订后的《中国帕金森焦虑量表》(Chinese Parkinson Anxiety Scale,简称CPAS)增加了PD特异性情境焦虑和文化相关项目,以解决东部PD人群面临的独特挑战。cpa的设计是为了反映东方文化的细微差别和pd特有的焦虑因素。本研究纳入138名PD患者和122名健康对照者,采用CPAS、Beck焦虑量表(BAI)和日常生活活动量表(ADL)对参与者进行评估。对量表的信度(即内部一致性和重测信度)和效度(即构效度、并发效度、收敛效度和区别效度)进行了严格的评估。CPAS具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.954)和重测信度(class内相关系数= 0.77)。PD患者与健康对照的并发效度差异显著。量表与BAI也表现出收敛的固效度(r = 0.585;p & lt;0.001),可接受的区分效度与ADL (r = - 0.086;p = 0.166)。PD情境焦虑项目的加入是一个重要的补充,它对PD患者的影响比原来的量表因子更显著。凭借其强大的心理测量特性和文化敏感性方法,CPAS成为评估中国PD人群焦虑的综合工具,促进了临床护理和健康公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信