Impact of patient expectation, motivation, and satisfaction on outcomes of neurosurgical deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression and obsessive–compulsive disorder

Teodora Sabkova , Volker A. Coenen , Thomas E. Schläpfer
{"title":"Impact of patient expectation, motivation, and satisfaction on outcomes of neurosurgical deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression and obsessive–compulsive disorder","authors":"Teodora Sabkova ,&nbsp;Volker A. Coenen ,&nbsp;Thomas E. Schläpfer","doi":"10.1016/j.pmip.2025.100162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) are the two main application areas of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in psychiatry. DBS in treatment-resistant OCD patients is part of the guidelines, while this procedure in treatment-resistant depressive patients, is still being regarded as being under development.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to explore the role of patient-related factors—specifically, expectation, motivation, and satisfaction—in the context of DBS outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant depression and OCD. The focus was on descriptively examining how these factors present before and after the surgery, and how they may relate to patients’ perception of treatment efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 58 patients participated in the study. Three measurement instruments were used for the investigation − the Client Motivation for Therapy Scale, the Stanford Expectancy Treatment Scale and the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Negative expectations decreased significantly, and realistic expectations increased postoperatively in both groups. Correlations between expectation levels and perceived treatment efficacy were observed at various time points. No significant differences in motivational behavior were found between the groups. Overall satisfaction with DBS was high across groups, with 81 % indicating they would choose the treatment again.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight the relevance of patient factors such as motivation, expectation, and satisfaction in the treatment of psychiatric patients undergoing DBS. These aspects, while not predictive in a causal sense, offer valuable insights into patient engagement and perceived benefit. Managing patient expectations, as in many invasive therapies, remains a key component of therapeutic success.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19837,"journal":{"name":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized Medicine in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468171725000158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment-resistant obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) are the two main application areas of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in psychiatry. DBS in treatment-resistant OCD patients is part of the guidelines, while this procedure in treatment-resistant depressive patients, is still being regarded as being under development.

Objectives

This study aimed to explore the role of patient-related factors—specifically, expectation, motivation, and satisfaction—in the context of DBS outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant depression and OCD. The focus was on descriptively examining how these factors present before and after the surgery, and how they may relate to patients’ perception of treatment efficacy.

Methods

A total of 58 patients participated in the study. Three measurement instruments were used for the investigation − the Client Motivation for Therapy Scale, the Stanford Expectancy Treatment Scale and the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire.

Results

Negative expectations decreased significantly, and realistic expectations increased postoperatively in both groups. Correlations between expectation levels and perceived treatment efficacy were observed at various time points. No significant differences in motivational behavior were found between the groups. Overall satisfaction with DBS was high across groups, with 81 % indicating they would choose the treatment again.

Conclusions

The findings highlight the relevance of patient factors such as motivation, expectation, and satisfaction in the treatment of psychiatric patients undergoing DBS. These aspects, while not predictive in a causal sense, offer valuable insights into patient engagement and perceived benefit. Managing patient expectations, as in many invasive therapies, remains a key component of therapeutic success.
患者期望、动机和满意度对神经外科深部脑刺激治疗难治性抑郁症和强迫症结果的影响
背景难治性重度抑郁症(MDD)和难治性强迫症(OCD)是脑深部电刺激(DBS)在精神病学中的两个主要应用领域。DBS治疗难治性强迫症患者是指南的一部分,而这种治疗难治性抑郁症患者的方法仍被认为处于开发阶段。目的:本研究旨在探讨患者相关因素,特别是期望、动机和满意度在难治性抑郁症和强迫症患者DBS治疗结果中的作用。重点是描述性地检查这些因素在手术前后是如何出现的,以及它们如何与患者对治疗效果的感知相关。方法共纳入58例患者。调查使用了三种测量工具-治疗动机量表,斯坦福期望治疗量表和可信度/期望问卷。结果两组患者术后负面期望均显著降低,现实期望均升高。在不同时间点观察期望水平与感知治疗疗效之间的相关性。两组之间的动机行为没有显著差异。各组对DBS的总体满意度很高,81%的人表示他们会再次选择治疗。结论本研究结果强调了动机、期望和满意度等患者因素与DBS治疗的相关性。这些方面虽然在因果意义上没有预测性,但为患者参与和感知益处提供了有价值的见解。与许多侵入性治疗一样,管理患者的期望仍然是治疗成功的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信