Rajan Kumar , Amit Kumar , Tarundeep Kaur , Gulshan Mahajan
{"title":"Weed control in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) with residue mulch, pre- and post-emergence herbicides","authors":"Rajan Kumar , Amit Kumar , Tarundeep Kaur , Gulshan Mahajan","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mungbean in the rice-wheat cropping system of northwest India faces severe competition from complex weed flora, resulting in reduced yield. Therefore, there is a need for effective and sustainable weed control measures in mungbean to enhance its productivity. Field experiments were conducted in 2022 and 2023 to evaluate the effectiveness of 15 weed control treatments in mungbean. The study assessed the impact of residue mulch and various pre-emergence (PRE) and post-emergence (POST) herbicides on mungbean. In both years, mungbean yield was improved with <strong>imazethapyr at 100 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup></strong> (by 74–78 %) and <strong>pendimethalin at 750 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup></strong> (by 69–74 %) applied as pre-emergence treatments, as well as with <strong>propaquizafop at 100 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup></strong> (by 68–76 %) and <strong>quizalofop-ethyl at 50 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup></strong> (by 63–64 %) applied as POST treatments, achieving over 75 % weed control compared with the nontreated control. A ready mixture of clodinafop + sodium acifluorfen (165 + 80 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup>) applied POST resulted in 95 % and 96 % higher yields in 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared with the nontreated control by providing excellent weed control (>90 %). Wheat residue mulch (6 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) increased mungbean yield by 59 % and 73 % in 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared with the nontreated control, by effectively reducing weed biomass. Pre-emergence herbicide (flumioxazin 250 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup>, imazethapyr 100 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup>, pendimethalin 750 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup>, and pyroxasulfone 127 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup>) treatments supplemented with wheat straw mulch did not provide an additional advantage for yield when compared to these herbicide treatments without mulch. Halosulfuron at 67 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup> applied POST initially caused the crop's toxicity, later recovered and thus resulted in improved yield by 27 % and 42 % in 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared with the nontreated control. These results suggest that pre-emergence herbicides such as imazethapyr and pendimethalin, and POST herbicides such as clodinafop + sodium acifluorfen, propaquizafop, and quizalofop-ethyl can be used in mungbean as a herbicide rotation program for sustainable weed control. Further, these results suggest that residue mulch can be used for effective weed control in the organic production of mungbean. Future research could focus on integrating these herbicide strategies with cultural techniques such as row spacing, seeding rate, etc., to further enhance weed management efficiency and crop productivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425001838","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mungbean in the rice-wheat cropping system of northwest India faces severe competition from complex weed flora, resulting in reduced yield. Therefore, there is a need for effective and sustainable weed control measures in mungbean to enhance its productivity. Field experiments were conducted in 2022 and 2023 to evaluate the effectiveness of 15 weed control treatments in mungbean. The study assessed the impact of residue mulch and various pre-emergence (PRE) and post-emergence (POST) herbicides on mungbean. In both years, mungbean yield was improved with imazethapyr at 100 g ai ha−1 (by 74–78 %) and pendimethalin at 750 g ai ha−1 (by 69–74 %) applied as pre-emergence treatments, as well as with propaquizafop at 100 g ai ha−1 (by 68–76 %) and quizalofop-ethyl at 50 g ai ha−1 (by 63–64 %) applied as POST treatments, achieving over 75 % weed control compared with the nontreated control. A ready mixture of clodinafop + sodium acifluorfen (165 + 80 g ai ha−1) applied POST resulted in 95 % and 96 % higher yields in 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared with the nontreated control by providing excellent weed control (>90 %). Wheat residue mulch (6 t ha−1) increased mungbean yield by 59 % and 73 % in 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared with the nontreated control, by effectively reducing weed biomass. Pre-emergence herbicide (flumioxazin 250 g ai ha−1, imazethapyr 100 g ai ha−1, pendimethalin 750 g ai ha−1, and pyroxasulfone 127 g ai ha−1) treatments supplemented with wheat straw mulch did not provide an additional advantage for yield when compared to these herbicide treatments without mulch. Halosulfuron at 67 g ai ha−1 applied POST initially caused the crop's toxicity, later recovered and thus resulted in improved yield by 27 % and 42 % in 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared with the nontreated control. These results suggest that pre-emergence herbicides such as imazethapyr and pendimethalin, and POST herbicides such as clodinafop + sodium acifluorfen, propaquizafop, and quizalofop-ethyl can be used in mungbean as a herbicide rotation program for sustainable weed control. Further, these results suggest that residue mulch can be used for effective weed control in the organic production of mungbean. Future research could focus on integrating these herbicide strategies with cultural techniques such as row spacing, seeding rate, etc., to further enhance weed management efficiency and crop productivity.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.