Weed control in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) with residue mulch, pre- and post-emergence herbicides

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Rajan Kumar , Amit Kumar , Tarundeep Kaur , Gulshan Mahajan
{"title":"Weed control in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) with residue mulch, pre- and post-emergence herbicides","authors":"Rajan Kumar ,&nbsp;Amit Kumar ,&nbsp;Tarundeep Kaur ,&nbsp;Gulshan Mahajan","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mungbean in the rice-wheat cropping system of northwest India faces severe competition from complex weed flora, resulting in reduced yield. Therefore, there is a need for effective and sustainable weed control measures in mungbean to enhance its productivity. Field experiments were conducted in 2022 and 2023 to evaluate the effectiveness of 15 weed control treatments in mungbean. The study assessed the impact of residue mulch and various pre-emergence (PRE) and post-emergence (POST) herbicides on mungbean. In both years, mungbean yield was improved with <strong>imazethapyr at 100 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup></strong> (by 74–78 %) and <strong>pendimethalin at 750 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup></strong> (by 69–74 %) applied as pre-emergence treatments, as well as with <strong>propaquizafop at 100 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup></strong> (by 68–76 %) and <strong>quizalofop-ethyl at 50 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup></strong> (by 63–64 %) applied as POST treatments, achieving over 75 % weed control compared with the nontreated control. A ready mixture of clodinafop + sodium acifluorfen (165 + 80 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup>) applied POST resulted in 95 % and 96 % higher yields in 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared with the nontreated control by providing excellent weed control (&gt;90 %). Wheat residue mulch (6 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) increased mungbean yield by 59 % and 73 % in 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared with the nontreated control, by effectively reducing weed biomass. Pre-emergence herbicide (flumioxazin 250 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup>, imazethapyr 100 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup>, pendimethalin 750 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup>, and pyroxasulfone 127 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup>) treatments supplemented with wheat straw mulch did not provide an additional advantage for yield when compared to these herbicide treatments without mulch. Halosulfuron at 67 g ai ha<sup>−1</sup> applied POST initially caused the crop's toxicity, later recovered and thus resulted in improved yield by 27 % and 42 % in 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared with the nontreated control. These results suggest that pre-emergence herbicides such as imazethapyr and pendimethalin, and POST herbicides such as clodinafop + sodium acifluorfen, propaquizafop, and quizalofop-ethyl can be used in mungbean as a herbicide rotation program for sustainable weed control. Further, these results suggest that residue mulch can be used for effective weed control in the organic production of mungbean. Future research could focus on integrating these herbicide strategies with cultural techniques such as row spacing, seeding rate, etc., to further enhance weed management efficiency and crop productivity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425001838","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mungbean in the rice-wheat cropping system of northwest India faces severe competition from complex weed flora, resulting in reduced yield. Therefore, there is a need for effective and sustainable weed control measures in mungbean to enhance its productivity. Field experiments were conducted in 2022 and 2023 to evaluate the effectiveness of 15 weed control treatments in mungbean. The study assessed the impact of residue mulch and various pre-emergence (PRE) and post-emergence (POST) herbicides on mungbean. In both years, mungbean yield was improved with imazethapyr at 100 g ai ha−1 (by 74–78 %) and pendimethalin at 750 g ai ha−1 (by 69–74 %) applied as pre-emergence treatments, as well as with propaquizafop at 100 g ai ha−1 (by 68–76 %) and quizalofop-ethyl at 50 g ai ha−1 (by 63–64 %) applied as POST treatments, achieving over 75 % weed control compared with the nontreated control. A ready mixture of clodinafop + sodium acifluorfen (165 + 80 g ai ha−1) applied POST resulted in 95 % and 96 % higher yields in 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared with the nontreated control by providing excellent weed control (>90 %). Wheat residue mulch (6 t ha−1) increased mungbean yield by 59 % and 73 % in 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared with the nontreated control, by effectively reducing weed biomass. Pre-emergence herbicide (flumioxazin 250 g ai ha−1, imazethapyr 100 g ai ha−1, pendimethalin 750 g ai ha−1, and pyroxasulfone 127 g ai ha−1) treatments supplemented with wheat straw mulch did not provide an additional advantage for yield when compared to these herbicide treatments without mulch. Halosulfuron at 67 g ai ha−1 applied POST initially caused the crop's toxicity, later recovered and thus resulted in improved yield by 27 % and 42 % in 2022 and 2023, respectively, compared with the nontreated control. These results suggest that pre-emergence herbicides such as imazethapyr and pendimethalin, and POST herbicides such as clodinafop + sodium acifluorfen, propaquizafop, and quizalofop-ethyl can be used in mungbean as a herbicide rotation program for sustainable weed control. Further, these results suggest that residue mulch can be used for effective weed control in the organic production of mungbean. Future research could focus on integrating these herbicide strategies with cultural techniques such as row spacing, seeding rate, etc., to further enhance weed management efficiency and crop productivity.
绿豆(Vigna radiata L.)杂草控制与残茬覆盖、出苗前后除草剂
印度西北部水稻-小麦种植系统中的绿豆面临来自复杂杂草区系的激烈竞争,导致产量下降。因此,需要采取有效和可持续的绿豆杂草防治措施,以提高绿豆的生产力。在2022年和2023年进行了绿豆15种防杂草处理的田间试验。本研究评价了残茬覆盖和各种出苗前(PRE)和出苗后(POST)除草剂对绿豆的影响。在这两年,出苗前施用100克吡嗪(74 - 78%)和750克苯甲醚(69 - 74%),以及后处理施用100克吡喹唑磷(68 - 76%)和50克吡喹唑乙酯(63 - 64%),绿豆产量均有提高,与未处理对照相比,杂草防治效果达到75%以上。使用POST的氯地那福+氟化氟钠(165 + 80 g / ha - 1)的混合物,在2022年和2023年的产量分别比未处理的对照高95%和96%,具有良好的杂草控制效果(90%)。小麦残茬覆盖(6 t ha - 1)通过有效减少杂草生物量,使绿豆产量在2022年和2023年分别比未处理对照提高59%和73%。与不覆盖的除草剂处理相比,苗期前除草剂(氟恶嗪250克/公顷- 1,吡嗪百克/公顷- 1,戊二甲基灵750克/公顷- 1,吡啶砜127克/公顷- 1)在小麦秸秆覆盖的补充下并没有提供额外的产量优势。施用67克氟磺隆后,最初对作物产生毒性,后来恢复,因此在2022年和2023年,与未处理的对照相比,产量分别提高了27%和42%。综上所述,苗期前除草剂如咪唑吡喃和戊二甲基灵,以及后除草剂如氯地那福+氟化氟钠、丙喹那福和奎quizofop -乙基可作为绿豆杂草可持续控制的轮作除草剂。综上所述,残茬覆盖在绿豆有机生产中可有效防治杂草。未来的研究可以将这些除草剂策略与栽培技术如行距、播种率等结合起来,进一步提高杂草管理效率和作物生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信