The cars are going to be alright: Examining micromobility infrastructure space allocation and potential improvement scenarios in Montréal

Daniel Romm, José Arturo Jasso Chávez, Lexi Kinman, Pegah Salsabilian, Grant McKenzie, Kevin Manaugh
{"title":"The cars are going to be alright: Examining micromobility infrastructure space allocation and potential improvement scenarios in Montréal","authors":"Daniel Romm,&nbsp;José Arturo Jasso Chávez,&nbsp;Lexi Kinman,&nbsp;Pegah Salsabilian,&nbsp;Grant McKenzie,&nbsp;Kevin Manaugh","doi":"10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many cities today are redesigning their streetscapes to redress the historical privilege afforded to the automobile in planning and policy. Much streetscape redesign is around transport infrastructure space, which largely prioritizes car travel and marginalizes other travel modes. Attempts by planners and policy makers to this end often are met with public opposition by advocates of the car, protesting about losing space on the street. This is empirically investigated with the case of Montréal by determining the allocation of street space to transport infrastructures, deriving measures of infrastructure space per traveller, and devising an Equal Infrastructure Allocation score to measure the imbalance between infrastructure provision per travel mode. Per borough, the distribution of transport infrastructure is examined, alongside correlations with demographic, socio-economic, land use, and crash rate variables. Potential scenarios of significant micromobility infrastructure improvement are modelled to test how infrastructure space apportionment per mode changes. This investigation discovers that even large improvements to micromobility infrastructure have a minor effect on space allocated to automobiles. Equal Infrastructure Allocation score and associated indicators are presented as useful tools for planners and policy makers implementing micromobility infrastructure projects, to better communicate with the public and address potential opposition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100771,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950105925000154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many cities today are redesigning their streetscapes to redress the historical privilege afforded to the automobile in planning and policy. Much streetscape redesign is around transport infrastructure space, which largely prioritizes car travel and marginalizes other travel modes. Attempts by planners and policy makers to this end often are met with public opposition by advocates of the car, protesting about losing space on the street. This is empirically investigated with the case of Montréal by determining the allocation of street space to transport infrastructures, deriving measures of infrastructure space per traveller, and devising an Equal Infrastructure Allocation score to measure the imbalance between infrastructure provision per travel mode. Per borough, the distribution of transport infrastructure is examined, alongside correlations with demographic, socio-economic, land use, and crash rate variables. Potential scenarios of significant micromobility infrastructure improvement are modelled to test how infrastructure space apportionment per mode changes. This investigation discovers that even large improvements to micromobility infrastructure have a minor effect on space allocated to automobiles. Equal Infrastructure Allocation score and associated indicators are presented as useful tools for planners and policy makers implementing micromobility infrastructure projects, to better communicate with the public and address potential opposition.
汽车将会很好:检查微移动基础设施的空间分配和潜在的改进方案在montracimal
如今,许多城市都在重新设计街景,以纠正历史上在规划和政策上给予汽车的特权。许多街景的重新设计都是围绕交通基础设施空间展开的,这在很大程度上优先考虑了汽车出行,而将其他出行方式边缘化。规划者和政策制定者在这方面的尝试经常遭到汽车支持者的反对,他们抗议汽车会失去街道上的空间。通过确定街道空间对交通基础设施的分配,得出每个旅行者的基础设施空间的度量,并设计一个平等基础设施分配分数来衡量每个旅行模式的基础设施供应之间的不平衡,从而对montracimal案例进行了实证调查。每个行政区,交通基础设施的分布,以及与人口、社会经济、土地使用和碰撞率变量的相关性进行了检查。对微交通基础设施显著改善的潜在情景进行建模,以测试基础设施空间分配如何随模式变化。这项调查发现,即使对微型交通基础设施的大幅改善,对分配给汽车的空间的影响也很小。平等基础设施分配分数和相关指标是规划人员和政策制定者实施微交通基础设施项目的有用工具,可以更好地与公众沟通,解决潜在的反对意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信