Evaluation of combined tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis and C-shaped flap technique in proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A retrospective propensity score matching analysis

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Ejso Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110227
Yifan Cheng , Zhen Tian , Jiajie Zhou , Shuai Zhao , Ruiqi Li , Yayan Fu , Jie Wang , Qiannan Sun , Daorong Wang
{"title":"Evaluation of combined tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis and C-shaped flap technique in proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A retrospective propensity score matching analysis","authors":"Yifan Cheng ,&nbsp;Zhen Tian ,&nbsp;Jiajie Zhou ,&nbsp;Shuai Zhao ,&nbsp;Ruiqi Li ,&nbsp;Yayan Fu ,&nbsp;Jie Wang ,&nbsp;Qiannan Sun ,&nbsp;Daorong Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is a functional-preserving surgical option for upper gastric and esophagogastric junction cancers. However, it is associated with a high risk of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of combining tubular gastroesophageal (TG) anastomosis with a C-shaped single muscle flap technique to enhance anti-reflux function.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent laparoscopic PG at Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital between June 2021 and June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: TG alone and TG combined with a C-shaped single muscle flap. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied in a 1:2 ratio to balance baseline characteristics. Clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and quality of life assessments using the PGSAS-45 questionnaire were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After PSM, 24 patients in the combined group and 48 in the TG group were analyzed. Operative time was significantly longer in the combined group (p &lt; 0.001), but no significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or complications (p &gt; 0.05). The combined group had a significantly lower incidence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, with better scores for esophageal reflux (p = 0.004), dissatisfaction with symptoms (p &lt; 0.001), and dissatisfaction at meals (p = 0.001) compared to the TG group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The combination of TG with a C-shaped single muscle flap significantly reduces postoperative reflux symptoms while maintaining surgical safety. Although it prolongs operative time, the technique provides an effective anti-reflux mechanism and improves postoperative quality of life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 9","pages":"Article 110227"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325006559","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is a functional-preserving surgical option for upper gastric and esophagogastric junction cancers. However, it is associated with a high risk of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of combining tubular gastroesophageal (TG) anastomosis with a C-shaped single muscle flap technique to enhance anti-reflux function.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent laparoscopic PG at Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital between June 2021 and June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: TG alone and TG combined with a C-shaped single muscle flap. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied in a 1:2 ratio to balance baseline characteristics. Clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and quality of life assessments using the PGSAS-45 questionnaire were analyzed.

Results

After PSM, 24 patients in the combined group and 48 in the TG group were analyzed. Operative time was significantly longer in the combined group (p < 0.001), but no significant differences were found in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or complications (p > 0.05). The combined group had a significantly lower incidence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, with better scores for esophageal reflux (p = 0.004), dissatisfaction with symptoms (p < 0.001), and dissatisfaction at meals (p = 0.001) compared to the TG group.

Conclusion

The combination of TG with a C-shaped single muscle flap significantly reduces postoperative reflux symptoms while maintaining surgical safety. Although it prolongs operative time, the technique provides an effective anti-reflux mechanism and improves postoperative quality of life.
胃食管管状吻合联合c型皮瓣技术在胃癌近端切除术中的应用:回顾性倾向评分匹配分析
背景近端胃切除术(PG)是一种保留功能的手术选择,用于上胃和食管胃交界癌。然而,它与术后胃食管反流的高风险相关。本研究评价管状胃食管(TG)吻合术联合c形单肌瓣技术增强抗反流功能的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析2021年6月至2024年6月苏北人民医院行腹腔镜PG术的患者。患者分为两组:单独TG组和TG联合c形单肌瓣组。倾向评分匹配(PSM)以1:2的比例来平衡基线特征。使用PGSAS-45问卷分析临床结果、术后并发症和生活质量评估。结果PSM后,联合组24例,TG组48例。联合组手术时间明显延长(p <;0.001),但术中出血量、术后住院时间或并发症方面无显著差异(p >;0.05)。联合治疗组胃食管反流症状发生率明显降低,食管反流评分较高(p = 0.004),对症状不满意(p <;0.001),与TG组相比,进餐不满意(p = 0.001)。结论TG联合c形单肌瓣可明显减轻术后反流症状,保证手术安全性。虽然延长了手术时间,但该技术提供了有效的抗反流机制,提高了术后生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ejso
Ejso 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1148
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery. The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信