Simone Torresin , Larissa Pereira de Souza , Seda Yuksel Dicle , Douaa Al-Assaad , Francesco Aletta , Alvaro Balderrama , Mariya P. Bivolarova , Pyoung-Jik Lee , Josep Llorca-Bofí , Henna Maula , Alessandra Luna Navarro , Ilaria Pigliautile , Anna Laura Pisello , Zhibin Wu
{"title":"Definition and performance of acoustic personalised environmental control systems (acoustic PECS): A systematic review","authors":"Simone Torresin , Larissa Pereira de Souza , Seda Yuksel Dicle , Douaa Al-Assaad , Francesco Aletta , Alvaro Balderrama , Mariya P. Bivolarova , Pyoung-Jik Lee , Josep Llorca-Bofí , Henna Maula , Alessandra Luna Navarro , Ilaria Pigliautile , Anna Laura Pisello , Zhibin Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Personalised Environmental Control Systems (PECS) enable occupants to locally adjust environmental parameters without affecting others. Rooted in the fields of thermal and air quality management, this approach is key for enhancing satisfaction and well-being in the built environment by empowering occupants to control their immediate surroundings. Moreover, it offers energy-saving potential by optimizing conditions in targeted areas rather than across the entire environment. Within the framework of the IEA EBC Annex 87, the concept was explored for the first time in the acoustic domain. After defining Acoustic PECS, a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines was conducted to unpack (1) technologies in the literature aligning with this concept; (2) their impact on occupants; and (3) current limitations. The literature search, conducted on Scopus, Web of Science, APA, and PubMed, included field or laboratory studies assessing systems enabling local acoustic control in settings that are relevant for office environments. Review papers, medical device studies, and reports without insights on occupant impact were excluded. Thirty-eight studies were selected, covering active and passive systems, building-attached, furniture-integrated, and wearable devices. The qualitative analysis highlighted potential positive effects in challenging acoustic environments, including reduced annoyance, improved work performance, masking or cancellation of intrusive noises, and enhancements in short-term memory, among other benefits, despite existing technological and methodological limitations. The evidence collected is constrained by the limited number of identified studies and methodological gaps stemming from the relatively wide focus of the studies where such devices were investigated. The definition of Acoustic PECS provides a foundation for future research, guiding the development of these systems and fostering high-quality and consistent evidence of their impacts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"282 ","pages":"Article 113243"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325007231","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Personalised Environmental Control Systems (PECS) enable occupants to locally adjust environmental parameters without affecting others. Rooted in the fields of thermal and air quality management, this approach is key for enhancing satisfaction and well-being in the built environment by empowering occupants to control their immediate surroundings. Moreover, it offers energy-saving potential by optimizing conditions in targeted areas rather than across the entire environment. Within the framework of the IEA EBC Annex 87, the concept was explored for the first time in the acoustic domain. After defining Acoustic PECS, a systematic review according to PRISMA guidelines was conducted to unpack (1) technologies in the literature aligning with this concept; (2) their impact on occupants; and (3) current limitations. The literature search, conducted on Scopus, Web of Science, APA, and PubMed, included field or laboratory studies assessing systems enabling local acoustic control in settings that are relevant for office environments. Review papers, medical device studies, and reports without insights on occupant impact were excluded. Thirty-eight studies were selected, covering active and passive systems, building-attached, furniture-integrated, and wearable devices. The qualitative analysis highlighted potential positive effects in challenging acoustic environments, including reduced annoyance, improved work performance, masking or cancellation of intrusive noises, and enhancements in short-term memory, among other benefits, despite existing technological and methodological limitations. The evidence collected is constrained by the limited number of identified studies and methodological gaps stemming from the relatively wide focus of the studies where such devices were investigated. The definition of Acoustic PECS provides a foundation for future research, guiding the development of these systems and fostering high-quality and consistent evidence of their impacts.
个性化环境控制系统(PECS)使居住者能够在不影响他人的情况下本地调整环境参数。植根于热和空气质量管理领域,这种方法是通过赋予居住者控制周围环境的能力来提高建筑环境满意度和幸福感的关键。此外,它通过优化目标区域的条件而不是整个环境来提供节能潜力。在IEA EBC附件87的框架内,这一概念首次在声学领域进行了探索。在定义声学PECS之后,根据PRISMA指南进行了系统回顾,以解开与该概念一致的文献中的技术;(二)对占用者的影响;(3)当前的局限性。在Scopus、Web of Science、APA和PubMed上进行的文献检索包括现场或实验室研究,评估在与办公环境相关的设置中实现局部声学控制的系统。没有深入了解乘员影响的综述论文、医疗器械研究和报告被排除在外。选择了38项研究,涵盖主动和被动系统,建筑附属,家具集成和可穿戴设备。定性分析强调了在具有挑战性的声学环境中潜在的积极影响,包括减少烦恼、提高工作性能、掩盖或消除干扰噪声、增强短期记忆等,尽管现有技术和方法存在局限性。所收集的证据受到确定的研究数量有限和方法上的差距的限制,这些差距源于对此类装置进行调查的研究的相对广泛的焦点。声学PECS的定义为未来的研究提供了基础,指导了这些系统的发展,并为其影响提供了高质量和一致的证据。
期刊介绍:
Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.