Review of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Insertion (TAVI) Clinician Opinions on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Post-TAVI Driving Guidelines

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Catherine R. Jarvis BSc , Pishoy Gouda MBBCh, MSc, FRCPC , Justin Ezekowitz MBBCh, MSc, FRCPC , Harriette G.C. Van Spall MD, MPH, FRCPC , Benjamin Tyrrell MD, FRCPC , Robert C. Welsh MD, FRCPC
{"title":"Review of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Insertion (TAVI) Clinician Opinions on the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Post-TAVI Driving Guidelines","authors":"Catherine R. Jarvis BSc ,&nbsp;Pishoy Gouda MBBCh, MSc, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Justin Ezekowitz MBBCh, MSc, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Harriette G.C. Van Spall MD, MPH, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Benjamin Tyrrell MD, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Robert C. Welsh MD, FRCPC","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2025.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>As compared to surgical aortic valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI) has a lower perioperative risk and an abbreviated recovery. In the absence of robust clinical data to guide decision-making, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society has now recommended the same 1-month driving restriction for both procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In April 2024, a 15-question survey was circulated to all 31 Canadian TAVI centres to explore opinions on the current driving recommendations and the safety of driving post TAVI, with the goal of informing updated expert-informed guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 31 TAVI centres, 29 individuals from 25 centres (80.6%) provided responses. The majority (79.3%) expressed that a 1-month driving prohibition was “too long,” and 20.7% stated that this restriction was appropriate. When asked to suggest a new post-TAVI driving recommendation for successful, uncomplicated, transfemoral TAVI patients, 41.4% proposed that patients be prohibited from driving for 2 weeks, 24.1% suggested 1 week, 13.8% were supportive of 1 month, and 6.9% were supportive of either 3 weeks, 72 hours, or 48 hours. The predominant driving-related concern was the development of conduction abnormalities (89.7%). A longer driving prohibition (≥ 1 month) was suggested in cases of alternative-access TAVI (transapical: 67.7%; alternative arterial: 51.6%), access-site and/or vascular complications (48.4%), and conduction abnormalities without a pacemaker (45.2%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The majority of Canadian TAVI programs expressed that a 1-month driving restriction period was overly cautious and that shorter restriction periods would be more appropriate. Ultimately, before any change to post-TAVI driving restrictions may be considered, a clinical assessment of patient recovery post TAVI is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":"7 6","pages":"Pages 843-850"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X25001866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

As compared to surgical aortic valve replacement, transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI) has a lower perioperative risk and an abbreviated recovery. In the absence of robust clinical data to guide decision-making, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society has now recommended the same 1-month driving restriction for both procedures.

Methods

In April 2024, a 15-question survey was circulated to all 31 Canadian TAVI centres to explore opinions on the current driving recommendations and the safety of driving post TAVI, with the goal of informing updated expert-informed guidelines.

Results

Of 31 TAVI centres, 29 individuals from 25 centres (80.6%) provided responses. The majority (79.3%) expressed that a 1-month driving prohibition was “too long,” and 20.7% stated that this restriction was appropriate. When asked to suggest a new post-TAVI driving recommendation for successful, uncomplicated, transfemoral TAVI patients, 41.4% proposed that patients be prohibited from driving for 2 weeks, 24.1% suggested 1 week, 13.8% were supportive of 1 month, and 6.9% were supportive of either 3 weeks, 72 hours, or 48 hours. The predominant driving-related concern was the development of conduction abnormalities (89.7%). A longer driving prohibition (≥ 1 month) was suggested in cases of alternative-access TAVI (transapical: 67.7%; alternative arterial: 51.6%), access-site and/or vascular complications (48.4%), and conduction abnormalities without a pacemaker (45.2%).

Conclusions

The majority of Canadian TAVI programs expressed that a 1-month driving restriction period was overly cautious and that shorter restriction periods would be more appropriate. Ultimately, before any change to post-TAVI driving restrictions may be considered, a clinical assessment of patient recovery post TAVI is needed.
经导管主动脉瓣置入术(TAVI)临床医师对加拿大心血管学会TAVI后驾驶指南的意见综述
背景:与外科主动脉瓣置换术相比,经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVI)的围手术期风险较低,恢复时间较短。由于缺乏可靠的临床数据来指导决策,加拿大心血管协会现在建议对这两种手术实行相同的1个月驾驶限制。方法2024年4月,在加拿大所有31家TAVI中心进行了一项15个问题的调查,以探讨对当前驾驶建议和TAVI后驾驶安全的意见,目的是为更新的专家指导方针提供信息。结果在31个TAVI中心中,有25个中心的29个人提供了反馈,占80.6%。大多数人(79.3%)表示,1个月的驾驶禁令“太长了”,20.7%的人表示这一限制是适当的。当被要求对成功的、无并发症的经股TAVI患者提出新的TAVI后驾驶建议时,41.4%的人建议患者禁止驾驶2周,24.1%的人建议1周,13.8%的人支持1个月,6.9%的人支持3周、72小时或48小时。与驾驶相关的主要问题是传导异常的发展(89.7%)。替代通道TAVI患者建议延长驾驶禁令(≥1个月)(经根尖:67.7%;动脉替代:51.6%),通路和/或血管并发症(48.4%),以及无起搏器的传导异常(45.2%)。结论大多数加拿大TAVI项目表示,1个月的驾驶限制期过于谨慎,较短的限制期更为合适。最终,在考虑改变TAVI后的驾驶限制之前,需要对TAVI后患者的恢复情况进行临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CJC Open
CJC Open Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信