Barriers and Experiences in Implementing Early Hospital Discharge for Patients with Low-Risk ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Vinay Jayachandiran MD , Elnaz Assadpour MD , Sofia Babapulle , Ryan Davey MD , Sabe De MD , Daniel Durocher MD , Ashlay Huitema MD , Nikolaos Tzemos MD , Rodrigo Bagur MD, PhD , Sarah Blissett MD, MHPE
{"title":"Barriers and Experiences in Implementing Early Hospital Discharge for Patients with Low-Risk ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction","authors":"Vinay Jayachandiran MD ,&nbsp;Elnaz Assadpour MD ,&nbsp;Sofia Babapulle ,&nbsp;Ryan Davey MD ,&nbsp;Sabe De MD ,&nbsp;Daniel Durocher MD ,&nbsp;Ashlay Huitema MD ,&nbsp;Nikolaos Tzemos MD ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Bagur MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sarah Blissett MD, MHPE","doi":"10.1016/j.cjco.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Our institution implemented a clinical pathway to facilitate early hospital discharge (EHD) in &lt; 48 hours post–primary percutaneous coronary intervention for low-risk ST elevation myocardial infarction. This study characterizes the exclusion criteria, barriers, safety profile, and patient satisfaction for EHD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We prospectively identified all patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction between January 2023 and March 2024. Patient characteristics, potential EHD barriers and 30-day readmission rates were recorded. A postdischarge telephone survey assessed patient satisfaction. Patients discharged at ≤ 48 hours formed the EHD cohort; those discharged later comprised the non-EHD cohort. Statistical comparisons were performed using the chi-squared and Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> tests, with logistic regression assessing EHD barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 433 STEMI patients, 65% (n = 282) were ineligible for EHD, primarily due to revascularization needs (29%) or infarct-related complications (47%). Of 151 eligible patients, 72% (n = 109) achieved EHD. Afternoon presentations were associated with higher EHD rates (82% vs 61%, odds ratio = 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.57-7.83, <em>P</em> = 0.002). Rates of 30--day readmission were lower in the EHD cohort (0% vs 7%, <em>P</em> = 0.007). Patient satisfaction (96% vs 95%, <em>P</em> = 0.841), perceived appropriate length of stay (91% vs 82%, <em>P</em> = 0.15), and intention to attend cardiac rehabilitation (63% vs 67%, <em>P</em> = 0.73) were comparable between cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Revascularization considerations and infarct-related complications were the most common reason for exclusion. Morning or overnight admissions were potential barriers to EHD, suggesting a role for optimized discharge planning. No adverse impacts on safety or patient satisfaction occurred.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36924,"journal":{"name":"CJC Open","volume":"7 6","pages":"Pages 719-724"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJC Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589790X25001283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Our institution implemented a clinical pathway to facilitate early hospital discharge (EHD) in < 48 hours post–primary percutaneous coronary intervention for low-risk ST elevation myocardial infarction. This study characterizes the exclusion criteria, barriers, safety profile, and patient satisfaction for EHD.

Methods

We prospectively identified all patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction between January 2023 and March 2024. Patient characteristics, potential EHD barriers and 30-day readmission rates were recorded. A postdischarge telephone survey assessed patient satisfaction. Patients discharged at ≤ 48 hours formed the EHD cohort; those discharged later comprised the non-EHD cohort. Statistical comparisons were performed using the chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests, with logistic regression assessing EHD barriers.

Results

Among 433 STEMI patients, 65% (n = 282) were ineligible for EHD, primarily due to revascularization needs (29%) or infarct-related complications (47%). Of 151 eligible patients, 72% (n = 109) achieved EHD. Afternoon presentations were associated with higher EHD rates (82% vs 61%, odds ratio = 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.57-7.83, P = 0.002). Rates of 30--day readmission were lower in the EHD cohort (0% vs 7%, P = 0.007). Patient satisfaction (96% vs 95%, P = 0.841), perceived appropriate length of stay (91% vs 82%, P = 0.15), and intention to attend cardiac rehabilitation (63% vs 67%, P = 0.73) were comparable between cohorts.

Conclusions

Revascularization considerations and infarct-related complications were the most common reason for exclusion. Morning or overnight admissions were potential barriers to EHD, suggesting a role for optimized discharge planning. No adverse impacts on safety or patient satisfaction occurred.
低危st段抬高型心肌梗死患者早期出院的障碍与经验
背景:我院实施了临床路径,以促进早期出院(EHD);低危ST段抬高型心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗48小时后本研究描述了EHD的排除标准、障碍、安全性和患者满意度。方法前瞻性研究2023年1月至2024年3月期间所有st段抬高型心肌梗死患者。记录患者特征、潜在EHD障碍和30天再入院率。出院后电话调查评估患者满意度。出院≤48小时的患者构成EHD队列;那些后来出院的人组成了非ehd组。采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计学比较,并采用logistic回归评估EHD障碍。结果在433例STEMI患者中,65% (n = 282)不符合EHD治疗条件,主要原因是血运重建需要(29%)或梗死相关并发症(47%)。在151例符合条件的患者中,72% (n = 109)达到EHD。下午的报告与较高的EHD发生率相关(82% vs 61%,优势比= 3.5,95%可信区间1.57-7.83,P = 0.002)。EHD组患者30天再入院率较低(0% vs 7%, P = 0.007)。患者满意度(96% vs 95%, P = 0.841)、认为适当的住院时间(91% vs 82%, P = 0.15)和参加心脏康复的意愿(63% vs 67%, P = 0.73)在队列之间具有可比性。结论考虑血运重建和梗死相关并发症是排除的最常见原因。早晨或夜间入院是EHD的潜在障碍,表明优化出院计划的作用。没有对安全性或患者满意度产生不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CJC Open
CJC Open Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信