The frequency and severity of ultrasound-detected osteoarthritis features in the knees and their associations with pain: Cross-sectional analyses of the Nor-Hand study

Caroline H. Dekkerhus , Alexander Mathiessen , Caroline M. Fjellstad , Barbara Slatwkosky-Christensen , Hilde Berner Hammer , Ida K. Haugen
{"title":"The frequency and severity of ultrasound-detected osteoarthritis features in the knees and their associations with pain: Cross-sectional analyses of the Nor-Hand study","authors":"Caroline H. Dekkerhus ,&nbsp;Alexander Mathiessen ,&nbsp;Caroline M. Fjellstad ,&nbsp;Barbara Slatwkosky-Christensen ,&nbsp;Hilde Berner Hammer ,&nbsp;Ida K. Haugen","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate the frequency and severity of ultrasound-detected osteophytes and synovitis in people with and without knee osteoarthritis (OA), and to explore the association between these ultrasound features and pain.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>In the Nor-Hand study, both knees were assessed for osteophytes (0–3 scale, four locations per knee) and grey-scale synovitis (0–3 scale). The frequency and severity of the ultrasound-detected features were compared in individuals with and without knee OA defined by the American College of Rheumatology criteria. Pain was self-reported in each knee (yes/no) and by the Western/Ontario McMaster University index (WOMAC). The associations between ultrasound-detected features and pain were examined by regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We analyzed 286 participants. Osteophytes of all sizes were more common in participants with knee OA compared to those without (65.9 ​% vs. 40.8 ​%, p ​&lt; ​0.001). No between-group difference was found for the frequency of any grey-scale synovitis (45.5 ​% vs. 44.7 ​%, p ​= ​0.67), while severe synovitis was more common in those with knee OA. Ultrasound-detected osteophyte sum score, but not synovitis, was associated with WOMAC pain (B ​= ​0.18, 95 ​% CI 0.03–0.32). Osteophytes of all sizes were associated with pain in the same knee with odds ratio (OR, 95 ​% CI) ranging from 1.85 (1.20–2.84) to 9.02 (4.04–20.10). Statistically significant association was found for severe synovitis only (OR ​= ​6.63, 95 ​% CI 2.26–19.43).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ultrasound-detected osteophytes were prevalent in people with knee OA and were associated with pain. OA pathology in individuals without fulfilling the knee OA criteria may reflect early or subclinical OA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913125000767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the frequency and severity of ultrasound-detected osteophytes and synovitis in people with and without knee osteoarthritis (OA), and to explore the association between these ultrasound features and pain.

Design

In the Nor-Hand study, both knees were assessed for osteophytes (0–3 scale, four locations per knee) and grey-scale synovitis (0–3 scale). The frequency and severity of the ultrasound-detected features were compared in individuals with and without knee OA defined by the American College of Rheumatology criteria. Pain was self-reported in each knee (yes/no) and by the Western/Ontario McMaster University index (WOMAC). The associations between ultrasound-detected features and pain were examined by regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index.

Results

We analyzed 286 participants. Osteophytes of all sizes were more common in participants with knee OA compared to those without (65.9 ​% vs. 40.8 ​%, p ​< ​0.001). No between-group difference was found for the frequency of any grey-scale synovitis (45.5 ​% vs. 44.7 ​%, p ​= ​0.67), while severe synovitis was more common in those with knee OA. Ultrasound-detected osteophyte sum score, but not synovitis, was associated with WOMAC pain (B ​= ​0.18, 95 ​% CI 0.03–0.32). Osteophytes of all sizes were associated with pain in the same knee with odds ratio (OR, 95 ​% CI) ranging from 1.85 (1.20–2.84) to 9.02 (4.04–20.10). Statistically significant association was found for severe synovitis only (OR ​= ​6.63, 95 ​% CI 2.26–19.43).

Conclusions

Ultrasound-detected osteophytes were prevalent in people with knee OA and were associated with pain. OA pathology in individuals without fulfilling the knee OA criteria may reflect early or subclinical OA.
超声检测膝关节骨关节炎特征的频率和严重程度及其与疼痛的关系:Nor-Hand研究的横断面分析
目的探讨膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)患者超声检查骨赘和滑膜炎的频率和严重程度,并探讨这些超声特征与疼痛的关系。在Nor-Hand研究中,评估双膝骨疣(0-3级,每个膝关节四个位置)和灰色滑膜炎(0-3级)。根据美国风湿病学会的标准,比较了有和没有膝关节OA的个体的超声检测特征的频率和严重程度。每个膝盖都自我报告疼痛(是/否),并通过西部/安大略省麦克马斯特大学指数(WOMAC)。通过年龄、性别和体重指数调整后的回归分析,检查超声检测特征与疼痛之间的关系。结果我们分析了286名参与者。各种大小的骨赘在患有膝关节OA的参与者中比没有膝关节OA的参与者更常见(65.9%比40.8%,p <;0.001)。灰色滑膜炎的发生率组间无差异(45.5%对44.7%,p = 0.67),而严重滑膜炎在膝关节OA患者中更为常见。超声检测骨赘总和评分与WOMAC疼痛相关,但与滑膜炎无关(B = 0.18, 95% CI 0.03-0.32)。不同大小的骨赘均与同一膝关节疼痛相关,优势比(OR, 95% CI)从1.85(1.20-2.84)到9.02(4.04-20.10)不等。仅在严重滑膜炎中发现有统计学意义的关联(OR = 6.63, 95% CI 2.26-19.43)。结论超声检出的骨赘在膝关节OA患者中普遍存在,且与疼痛有关。不符合膝关节OA标准的个体的OA病理可能反映早期或亚临床OA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信