Seismic resilience assessment of shield tunnels under contact loss defects using a hybrid neural network model driven by machine learning and numerical simulation

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Xianlong Wu , Xiaohua Bao , Jun Shen , Xiangsheng Chen
{"title":"Seismic resilience assessment of shield tunnels under contact loss defects using a hybrid neural network model driven by machine learning and numerical simulation","authors":"Xianlong Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaohua Bao ,&nbsp;Jun Shen ,&nbsp;Xiangsheng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contact loss defects (CLD) have a significant impact on the seismic performance of shield tunnels with segmental joints. Accurately evaluating the seismic resilience of tunnels under the influence of CLD is crucial for ensuring the safety of urban rail transit systems. In this study, a comprehensive dataset considering the effects of CLD was constructed using actual ground penetrating radar (GPR) detection data, combined with Monte Carlo sampling and finite element simulations. A machine learning and numerical simulation-driven MoE-BP (Mixture of Experts–Backpropagation) neural network model was proposed to efficiently and accurately assess the seismic resilience of shield tunnels with segments joints. Based on the assessment results, targeted recommendations for defect repair strategies were developed. The results indicate that the shear wave velocity of the stratum and the circumferential angle of the CLD are the most critical factors influencing the seismic performance of tunnel; when the defects are located near segmental joints, which pose the most adverse impact on resilience. The proposed seismic resilience assessment indicators—combining damage variables and the inner contour area of the tunnel—effectively capture the coupling effects between CLD and segmental joints. Compared with a conventional BP neural network, the MoE-BP model achieves significantly higher accuracy and computational efficiency, with a 70% reduction in mean squared error and a 13% increase in correlation coefficient after 1000 training epochs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 106801"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825004390","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contact loss defects (CLD) have a significant impact on the seismic performance of shield tunnels with segmental joints. Accurately evaluating the seismic resilience of tunnels under the influence of CLD is crucial for ensuring the safety of urban rail transit systems. In this study, a comprehensive dataset considering the effects of CLD was constructed using actual ground penetrating radar (GPR) detection data, combined with Monte Carlo sampling and finite element simulations. A machine learning and numerical simulation-driven MoE-BP (Mixture of Experts–Backpropagation) neural network model was proposed to efficiently and accurately assess the seismic resilience of shield tunnels with segments joints. Based on the assessment results, targeted recommendations for defect repair strategies were developed. The results indicate that the shear wave velocity of the stratum and the circumferential angle of the CLD are the most critical factors influencing the seismic performance of tunnel; when the defects are located near segmental joints, which pose the most adverse impact on resilience. The proposed seismic resilience assessment indicators—combining damage variables and the inner contour area of the tunnel—effectively capture the coupling effects between CLD and segmental joints. Compared with a conventional BP neural network, the MoE-BP model achieves significantly higher accuracy and computational efficiency, with a 70% reduction in mean squared error and a 13% increase in correlation coefficient after 1000 training epochs.
基于机器学习和数值模拟驱动的混合神经网络模型的盾构隧道接触损耗缺陷地震恢复评估
接触损耗缺陷(CLD)对带节段缝盾构隧道的抗震性能有重要影响。准确评估隧道在CLD影响下的抗震恢复能力,对于保证城市轨道交通系统的安全至关重要。本文利用探地雷达(GPR)实际探测数据,结合蒙特卡罗采样和有限元模拟,构建了考虑CLD影响的综合数据集。提出了一种机器学习和数值模拟驱动的MoE-BP(混合专家-反向传播)神经网络模型,用于高效、准确地评估分段缝盾构隧道的抗震回弹能力。基于评估结果,针对缺陷修复策略提出了有针对性的建议。结果表明:地层横波速度和底板周向角是影响隧道抗震性能的最关键因素;当缺陷位于节理附近时,对弹性影响最大。提出了结合损伤变量和隧道内轮廓面积的抗震回弹评价指标,有效地反映了混凝土混凝土与节段节理之间的耦合效应。与传统BP神经网络相比,经过1000次训练后,MoE-BP模型的准确率和计算效率显著提高,均方误差降低了70%,相关系数提高了13%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
18.80%
发文量
454
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信