Household seed security: A case of maize and wheat seed systems in the mountains of Nepal

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kishor Atreya , Hom Nath Gartaula , Kanchan Kattel
{"title":"Household seed security: A case of maize and wheat seed systems in the mountains of Nepal","authors":"Kishor Atreya ,&nbsp;Hom Nath Gartaula ,&nbsp;Kanchan Kattel","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Household seed security enhances agricultural productivity and strengthens climate resilience, yet persistent seed insecurity remains a critical challenge in Nepal despite intervention efforts. Notably, women play a significant role in seed systems across developing countries, yet their contributions are frequently marginalised because of entrenched gender norms and socio-cultural barriers.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study examines seed security among maize and wheat-growing households in Nepal, analysing different social, economic, cultural, and spatial variables. It specifically investigates: (1) the current state of seed security for maize and wheat farmers, (2) the role of gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and other socioeconomic factors in shaping seed security, and (3) variations in these relationships across different seed security levels.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>Data were collected from 250 households across two municipalities during October–November 2021. Seed security was evaluated using the FAO's four-dimensional framework (availability, accessibility, varietal suitability, and quality). Gender-based household typologies (male-headed, female-headed, or jointly managed) were determined through Likert-scale assessments. Quantile regression analysis was employed to examine the effects of various contextual factors, including gender and ethnicity, on varying levels of seed security.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusion</h3><div>This study reveals distinct seed-sourcing patterns in Nepal's mountains: maize depends on formal markets (agrovets), while wheat relies on informal systems (saved seeds/local exchanges). Seed insecurity persists for both crops, shaped by divergent factors. Education and larger landholdings improve wheat seed security, whereas year-round food sufficiency enhances maize seed security. Paradoxically, access to formal market reduces wheat seed security, suggesting trade-offs. Experiences of historical seed insecurity have lasting negative effects, while informal seed saving practices build resilience, particularly at higher seed security levels. Gender analysis highlights women's central role in enhancing seed security, with Dalit households showing disproportionate vulnerability. In conclusion, findings highlight the need for crop-specific, context-sensitive interventions addressing systemic vulnerabilities in Nepal's mountain agri-food systems.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>This research advances integrated seed sector development by demonstrating the need to recognise pluralistic seed systems and formulate crop-specific seed policies. The findings highlight how gender-inclusive approaches and formal-informal sector synergies can enhance seed security.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 104419"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X25001593","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Household seed security enhances agricultural productivity and strengthens climate resilience, yet persistent seed insecurity remains a critical challenge in Nepal despite intervention efforts. Notably, women play a significant role in seed systems across developing countries, yet their contributions are frequently marginalised because of entrenched gender norms and socio-cultural barriers.

Objective

This study examines seed security among maize and wheat-growing households in Nepal, analysing different social, economic, cultural, and spatial variables. It specifically investigates: (1) the current state of seed security for maize and wheat farmers, (2) the role of gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and other socioeconomic factors in shaping seed security, and (3) variations in these relationships across different seed security levels.

Methodology

Data were collected from 250 households across two municipalities during October–November 2021. Seed security was evaluated using the FAO's four-dimensional framework (availability, accessibility, varietal suitability, and quality). Gender-based household typologies (male-headed, female-headed, or jointly managed) were determined through Likert-scale assessments. Quantile regression analysis was employed to examine the effects of various contextual factors, including gender and ethnicity, on varying levels of seed security.

Results and conclusion

This study reveals distinct seed-sourcing patterns in Nepal's mountains: maize depends on formal markets (agrovets), while wheat relies on informal systems (saved seeds/local exchanges). Seed insecurity persists for both crops, shaped by divergent factors. Education and larger landholdings improve wheat seed security, whereas year-round food sufficiency enhances maize seed security. Paradoxically, access to formal market reduces wheat seed security, suggesting trade-offs. Experiences of historical seed insecurity have lasting negative effects, while informal seed saving practices build resilience, particularly at higher seed security levels. Gender analysis highlights women's central role in enhancing seed security, with Dalit households showing disproportionate vulnerability. In conclusion, findings highlight the need for crop-specific, context-sensitive interventions addressing systemic vulnerabilities in Nepal's mountain agri-food systems.

Significance

This research advances integrated seed sector development by demonstrating the need to recognise pluralistic seed systems and formulate crop-specific seed policies. The findings highlight how gender-inclusive approaches and formal-informal sector synergies can enhance seed security.
家庭种子安全:以尼泊尔山区玉米和小麦种子系统为例
家庭种子安全提高了农业生产力,增强了气候适应能力,然而,尽管采取了干预措施,但持续存在的种子不安全仍然是尼泊尔面临的重大挑战。值得注意的是,妇女在发展中国家的种子系统中发挥着重要作用,但由于根深蒂固的性别规范和社会文化障碍,她们的贡献往往被边缘化。本研究通过分析不同的社会、经济、文化和空间变量,调查了尼泊尔玉米和小麦种植户的种子安全状况。具体调查:(1)玉米和小麦农民的种子安全现状;(2)性别、种族、地理位置和其他社会经济因素对种子安全的影响;(3)这些关系在不同种子安全水平上的变化。方法在2021年10月至11月期间从两个城市的250户家庭收集数据。利用粮农组织的四维框架(可得性、可及性、品种适宜性和质量)对种子安全性进行了评估。通过李克特量表评估确定基于性别的家庭类型(男户主、女户主或共同管理)。分位数回归分析考察了不同背景因素(包括性别和种族)对种子安全水平的影响。本研究揭示了尼泊尔山区不同的种子采购模式:玉米依赖于正式市场(agrovets),而小麦依赖于非正式系统(保存的种子/当地交换)。由于不同因素的影响,这两种作物的种子安全问题依然存在。教育和更大的土地拥有量提高了小麦种子的安全性,而全年粮食充足则提高了玉米种子的安全性。矛盾的是,进入正规市场会降低小麦种子的安全性,这意味着取舍。历史上种子不安全的经历会产生持久的负面影响,而非正式的种子保存做法可以增强抵御力,特别是在种子安全水平较高的地区。性别分析强调了妇女在加强种子安全方面的核心作用,达利特家庭表现出不成比例的脆弱性。总而言之,研究结果强调需要针对特定作物、对环境敏感的干预措施来解决尼泊尔山地农业粮食系统的系统性脆弱性。这项研究通过展示认识多元化种子系统和制定特定作物种子政策的必要性,推动了种子部门的综合发展。研究结果强调了性别包容性方法和正式-非正式部门协同作用如何能够加强种子安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信