Co-location of sheep grazing and solar energy production yields agrotechnological synergies

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nikola Kochendoerfer , A. Sophie Westbrook , Christina E. McMillan , P. Andrew Lapierre , Muhammad A. Zaman , Scott H. Morris , Antonio DiTommaso , Steven M. Grodsky
{"title":"Co-location of sheep grazing and solar energy production yields agrotechnological synergies","authors":"Nikola Kochendoerfer ,&nbsp;A. Sophie Westbrook ,&nbsp;Christina E. McMillan ,&nbsp;P. Andrew Lapierre ,&nbsp;Muhammad A. Zaman ,&nbsp;Scott H. Morris ,&nbsp;Antonio DiTommaso ,&nbsp;Steven M. Grodsky","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Agrivoltaics—the co-location of solar energy and agricultural production—may reduce land-use competition and boost revenues for landowners. Sheep grazing in solar facilities (i.e., solar grazing/agrivoltaic grazing systems) is increasingly common in agricultural areas. Solar grazing can provide land access to flock owners and support agricultural viability via payments for vegetation management. However, there is a need for more data on how co-location of sheep grazing and solar energy production affects flock health, stocking rates, and feedback loops for maintenance of vegetation in solar facilities across regions.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Our objective was to better understand synergies and trade-offs associated with agrivoltaic grazing systems by investigating applied grazing management questions and concepts regarding agrotechnological co-benefits related to simultaneous flock health and vegetation management in solar facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We tested effects of sheep stocking rates (0 to 10 sheep per ha<sup>−1</sup>), site preparation (fallow vs. legume seed-mix planting), and microclimate (panel-shaded areas vs. panel interspaces) on herbage yield and nutritional quality, flock health and condition, and a vegetation management success index. We collected these data across two grazing seasons in an operational, 21.85-ha photovoltaic solar facility (18 MW) established on a previous old field in New York State, USA.</div></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><div>Shade from solar panels negatively affected herbage yield. We detected no significant differences in herbage yield or vegetation management outcomes between fallow and planted legume plots, suggesting that regrowth from native seed banks in solar facilities on previous old fields may be an economical alternative to seeding for sheep forage. Sheep stocking rates affected flock health and condition; we identified an optimal stocking rate of 8 sheep per ha<sup>−1</sup> for achieving sufficient herbage yield and quality, maintaining flock health, and preventing vegetation overgrowth from shading solar panels at our study site. Solar grazing can yield an agrotechnological synergy supporting healthy forage, healthy sheep, and vegetation management in community-scale (i.e., &lt;25 MW) solar facilities without mowing. In a well-managed solar grazing system, high herbage yield and quality promote high flock health and condition, and the healthy flock suppresses vegetation enough to prevent panel shading without mowing.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>Our study highlights the potential for sheep grazing in solar facilities to simultaneously benefit sheep and solar energy production systems. Solar grazing can present a “win-win\" scenario for solar developers and sheep producers in the northeastern U.S.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"229 ","pages":"Article 104403"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X2500143X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context

Agrivoltaics—the co-location of solar energy and agricultural production—may reduce land-use competition and boost revenues for landowners. Sheep grazing in solar facilities (i.e., solar grazing/agrivoltaic grazing systems) is increasingly common in agricultural areas. Solar grazing can provide land access to flock owners and support agricultural viability via payments for vegetation management. However, there is a need for more data on how co-location of sheep grazing and solar energy production affects flock health, stocking rates, and feedback loops for maintenance of vegetation in solar facilities across regions.

Objective

Our objective was to better understand synergies and trade-offs associated with agrivoltaic grazing systems by investigating applied grazing management questions and concepts regarding agrotechnological co-benefits related to simultaneous flock health and vegetation management in solar facilities.

Methods

We tested effects of sheep stocking rates (0 to 10 sheep per ha−1), site preparation (fallow vs. legume seed-mix planting), and microclimate (panel-shaded areas vs. panel interspaces) on herbage yield and nutritional quality, flock health and condition, and a vegetation management success index. We collected these data across two grazing seasons in an operational, 21.85-ha photovoltaic solar facility (18 MW) established on a previous old field in New York State, USA.

Results and conclusions

Shade from solar panels negatively affected herbage yield. We detected no significant differences in herbage yield or vegetation management outcomes between fallow and planted legume plots, suggesting that regrowth from native seed banks in solar facilities on previous old fields may be an economical alternative to seeding for sheep forage. Sheep stocking rates affected flock health and condition; we identified an optimal stocking rate of 8 sheep per ha−1 for achieving sufficient herbage yield and quality, maintaining flock health, and preventing vegetation overgrowth from shading solar panels at our study site. Solar grazing can yield an agrotechnological synergy supporting healthy forage, healthy sheep, and vegetation management in community-scale (i.e., <25 MW) solar facilities without mowing. In a well-managed solar grazing system, high herbage yield and quality promote high flock health and condition, and the healthy flock suppresses vegetation enough to prevent panel shading without mowing.

Significance

Our study highlights the potential for sheep grazing in solar facilities to simultaneously benefit sheep and solar energy production systems. Solar grazing can present a “win-win" scenario for solar developers and sheep producers in the northeastern U.S.
羊放牧和太阳能生产的共存产生了农业技术的协同效应
农业发电——太阳能和农业生产的结合——可以减少土地使用的竞争,增加土地所有者的收入。绵羊在太阳能设施(即太阳能放牧/农业光伏放牧系统)中放牧在农业地区越来越普遍。太阳能放牧可以为牧群所有者提供土地使用权,并通过支付植被管理费用来支持农业的可行性。然而,还需要更多的数据来说明羊群放牧和太阳能生产的共存如何影响羊群健康、放养率以及各地区太阳能设施中植被维护的反馈回路。我们的目标是通过研究应用放牧管理问题和太阳能设施中与羊群健康和植被管理同时相关的农业技术共同效益的概念,更好地了解与农业光伏放牧系统相关的协同效应和权衡。方法我们测试了放羊率(每公顷0 ~ 10只羊)、场地准备(休耕vs豆科混合种子种植)和小气候(面板阴影区vs面板间隙)对牧草产量和营养质量、羊群健康和状况以及植被管理成功指数的影响。我们在两个放牧季节收集了这些数据,在美国纽约州的一个旧场地上建立了一个21.85公顷的光伏太阳能设施(18兆瓦)。结果与结论太阳能板遮荫对牧草产量有负面影响。我们发现,在休耕和种植豆科地之间,牧草产量和植被管理结果没有显著差异,这表明,在以前的旧地里,利用太阳能设施从本地种子库中再生可能是一种经济的替代方案,可以播种羊饲料。绵羊放养率影响羊群健康状况;我们确定了每公顷8只羊的最佳放养率,以实现足够的牧草产量和质量,保持羊群健康,并防止遮挡太阳能电池板导致植被过度生长。太阳能放牧可以产生农业技术协同效应,支持健康的饲料、健康的羊和社区规模的植被管理(即25兆瓦)太阳能设施,而不需要割草。在管理良好的太阳能放牧系统中,较高的牧草产量和质量促进了较高的羊群健康和状况,健康的羊群对植被的抑制足以防止面板遮阳而不割草。我们的研究强调了羊在太阳能设施中放牧的潜力,同时使羊和太阳能生产系统受益。太阳能放牧可以为美国东北部的太阳能开发商和绵羊生产商带来“双赢”的局面
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信