Effect of depression treatment on subjective sleep components among primary care patients: Data from the eIMPACT trial

Matthew D. Schuiling , Wei Wu , Brittanny M. Polanka , Aubrey L. Shell , Michelle K. Williams , Christopher A. Crawford , Krysha L. MacDonald , John I. Nurnberger Jr. , Christopher M. Callahan , Jesse C. Stewart
{"title":"Effect of depression treatment on subjective sleep components among primary care patients: Data from the eIMPACT trial","authors":"Matthew D. Schuiling ,&nbsp;Wei Wu ,&nbsp;Brittanny M. Polanka ,&nbsp;Aubrey L. Shell ,&nbsp;Michelle K. Williams ,&nbsp;Christopher A. Crawford ,&nbsp;Krysha L. MacDonald ,&nbsp;John I. Nurnberger Jr. ,&nbsp;Christopher M. Callahan ,&nbsp;Jesse C. Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Sleep disturbance is a multifaceted symptom of depression that disproportionately impacts marginalized groups. Depression treatment improves sleep disturbance in some individuals; however, the components of sleep disturbance improved remain unidentified. This secondary analysis of the eIMPACT randomized controlled trial examines effects of depression treatment on subjective sleep disturbance components.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>216 primary care patients with depression from a safety net healthcare system were randomized to 12-months of modernized collaborative care (internet cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT], telephonic CBT, and/or antidepressants; <em>n</em> = 107) or usual primary care for depression (primary care providers supported by embedded behavioral health clinicians and psychiatrists; <em>n</em> = 109). Subjective sleep disturbance components were assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Mixed-effect models examined intervention effects on changes in subjective sleep disturbance components. The intervention improved PSQI global scores, sleep onset latency, subjective sleep quality, and daytime dysfunction across 24-months, and these effects diminished after treatment termination. At post-treatment, intervention participants had greater improvements in PSQI global scores (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, <em>d</em>=-0.62), sleep onset latency (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01, <em>d</em>=-0.43), daytime dysfunction (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01, <em>d</em>=-0.35), and sleep disturbances (<em>p</em> = 0.01, <em>d</em>=-0.26) compared to usual care, but no differences in subjective sleep quality, total sleep time, sleep efficiency, or sleep medication use. Intervention effects were not moderated by race, education, or income. Pre- to post-treatment improvements in depressive symptoms were associated with improvements in some sleep disturbance components.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Depression treatment improves some, not all, subjective sleep disturbance components, with benefits diminishing after termination. Adjunctive interventions are likely needed to address the lingering components of sleep disturbance.</div></div><div><h3>ClinicalTrials.gov Idenifier</h3><div>NCT02458690</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295000442500029X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Sleep disturbance is a multifaceted symptom of depression that disproportionately impacts marginalized groups. Depression treatment improves sleep disturbance in some individuals; however, the components of sleep disturbance improved remain unidentified. This secondary analysis of the eIMPACT randomized controlled trial examines effects of depression treatment on subjective sleep disturbance components.

Methods

216 primary care patients with depression from a safety net healthcare system were randomized to 12-months of modernized collaborative care (internet cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT], telephonic CBT, and/or antidepressants; n = 107) or usual primary care for depression (primary care providers supported by embedded behavioral health clinicians and psychiatrists; n = 109). Subjective sleep disturbance components were assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

Results

Mixed-effect models examined intervention effects on changes in subjective sleep disturbance components. The intervention improved PSQI global scores, sleep onset latency, subjective sleep quality, and daytime dysfunction across 24-months, and these effects diminished after treatment termination. At post-treatment, intervention participants had greater improvements in PSQI global scores (p < 0.001, d=-0.62), sleep onset latency (p < 0.01, d=-0.43), daytime dysfunction (p < 0.01, d=-0.35), and sleep disturbances (p = 0.01, d=-0.26) compared to usual care, but no differences in subjective sleep quality, total sleep time, sleep efficiency, or sleep medication use. Intervention effects were not moderated by race, education, or income. Pre- to post-treatment improvements in depressive symptoms were associated with improvements in some sleep disturbance components.

Conclusions

Depression treatment improves some, not all, subjective sleep disturbance components, with benefits diminishing after termination. Adjunctive interventions are likely needed to address the lingering components of sleep disturbance.

ClinicalTrials.gov Idenifier

NCT02458690
抑郁症治疗对初级保健患者主观睡眠成分的影响:来自eIMPACT试验的数据
目的睡眠障碍是抑郁症的一种多面性症状,对边缘人群的影响尤为严重。抑郁症治疗改善了一些人的睡眠障碍;然而,睡眠障碍改善的组成部分仍未确定。这项eIMPACT随机对照试验的二次分析检验了抑郁症治疗对主观睡眠障碍成分的影响。方法216例来自安全网医疗保健系统的初级保健抑郁症患者随机接受12个月的现代化协同护理(网络认知行为治疗[CBT]、电话CBT和/或抗抑郁药物);N = 107)或抑郁症的常规初级保健(由嵌入行为健康临床医生和精神科医生支持的初级保健提供者;n = 109)。采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评估主观睡眠障碍成分。结果混合效应模型考察了干预对主观睡眠障碍成分变化的影响。干预改善了24个月的PSQI总体评分、睡眠发作潜伏期、主观睡眠质量和白天功能障碍,这些影响在治疗结束后减弱。在治疗后,与常规护理相比,干预参与者在PSQI总体评分(p <; 0.001,d=-0.62)、睡眠发作潜伏期(p <; 0.01,d=-0.43)、白天功能障碍(p <; 0.01,d=-0.35)和睡眠障碍(p = 0.01,d=-0.26)方面有更大的改善,但在主观睡眠质量、总睡眠时间、睡眠效率或睡眠药物使用方面没有差异。干预效果不受种族、教育或收入的影响。治疗前后抑郁症状的改善与某些睡眠障碍成分的改善相关。结论抑郁症治疗改善了部分(而非全部)主观睡眠障碍成分,终止治疗后益处逐渐减少。辅助干预可能需要解决睡眠障碍的挥之不去的组成部分
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信