Potential CO2 Geological Storage in Deep Tight Sandstone Saline Aquifers of Ordos Basin in China

IF 5.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Gang Zhao, Xuan Tang*, Zijian Wang, Tieya Jing, Wentao Zhao, Juan Zhou, Zhen Li, Tianyi Niu and Ziheng Guan, 
{"title":"Potential CO2 Geological Storage in Deep Tight Sandstone Saline Aquifers of Ordos Basin in China","authors":"Gang Zhao,&nbsp;Xuan Tang*,&nbsp;Zijian Wang,&nbsp;Tieya Jing,&nbsp;Wentao Zhao,&nbsp;Juan Zhou,&nbsp;Zhen Li,&nbsp;Tianyi Niu and Ziheng Guan,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c0157810.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Deep saline aquifers have significant potential for CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage. The Longdong region, a major coal-fired power base on the southwestern margin of the Ordos Basin, faces an urgent need for CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage. This study investigates the Permian (P) and Triassic (T) strata to assess the suitability and potentiality of deep, tight saline sandstone aquifers for CO<sub>2</sub> storage in the study region. A multilevel suitability evaluation index system consisting of 3 primary categories, 9 subcategories, and 29 parameters was established to screen favorable reservoir intervals in deep tight sandstone saline aquifers. Furthermore, the evaluation methodology for the favorable interval selection based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method (FCE) was proposed. Seven potential reservoir-caprock assemblages (units T1–T7) were identified within the Zhifang, Heshanggou, Liujiagou, and Shiqianfeng formations. The evaluation results classify two assemblages as Class I favorable reservoir intervals, two as Class II relatively favorable, and three as Class III moderately favorable. Units T4 and T5 were identified as the Class I storage targets due to their high porosity and permeability, substantial thickness, moderate burial depth, and well-developed caprock continuity. Using the mechanism-based method of CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage, we calculated the CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity of different units was calculated. The total theoretical CO<sub>2</sub> storage capacity in the study region is estimated to reach as high as approximately 78 833.86 Mt with an effective storage capacity of 1892.01 Mt. Class I reservoir intervals account for 34 761.66 Mt theoretical and 834.28 Mt effective capacity, representing 44.10% of the total storage capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":35,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Fuels","volume":"39 23","pages":"11292–11307 11292–11307"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Fuels","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c01578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deep saline aquifers have significant potential for CO2 geological storage. The Longdong region, a major coal-fired power base on the southwestern margin of the Ordos Basin, faces an urgent need for CO2 geological storage. This study investigates the Permian (P) and Triassic (T) strata to assess the suitability and potentiality of deep, tight saline sandstone aquifers for CO2 storage in the study region. A multilevel suitability evaluation index system consisting of 3 primary categories, 9 subcategories, and 29 parameters was established to screen favorable reservoir intervals in deep tight sandstone saline aquifers. Furthermore, the evaluation methodology for the favorable interval selection based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation method (FCE) was proposed. Seven potential reservoir-caprock assemblages (units T1–T7) were identified within the Zhifang, Heshanggou, Liujiagou, and Shiqianfeng formations. The evaluation results classify two assemblages as Class I favorable reservoir intervals, two as Class II relatively favorable, and three as Class III moderately favorable. Units T4 and T5 were identified as the Class I storage targets due to their high porosity and permeability, substantial thickness, moderate burial depth, and well-developed caprock continuity. Using the mechanism-based method of CO2 geological storage, we calculated the CO2 storage capacity of different units was calculated. The total theoretical CO2 storage capacity in the study region is estimated to reach as high as approximately 78 833.86 Mt with an effective storage capacity of 1892.01 Mt. Class I reservoir intervals account for 34 761.66 Mt theoretical and 834.28 Mt effective capacity, representing 44.10% of the total storage capacity.

鄂尔多斯盆地深部致密砂岩咸水层潜在的CO2地质储层
深层含盐含水层具有巨大的二氧化碳地质储存潜力。陇东地区是鄂尔多斯盆地西南边缘的主要燃煤发电基地,迫切需要对二氧化碳进行地质封存。本研究对研究区二叠纪(P)和三叠纪(T)地层进行了研究,以评估深层致密含盐砂岩含水层封存CO2的适宜性和潜力。建立了由3个主类、9个子类、29个参数组成的多层次适宜性评价指标体系,筛选深部致密砂岩咸化含水层有利储层段。在此基础上,提出了基于层次分析法(AHP)和模糊综合评判法(FCE)的优选区间评价方法。在志坊组、河上沟组、刘家沟组和石千峰组中,确定了7个潜在的储盖组合(t1 ~ t7单元)。评价结果将2个组合划分为ⅰ类有利储层段,2个为ⅱ类相对有利储层段,3个为ⅲ类中等有利储层段。T4和T5单元孔隙度和渗透率高,厚度大,埋深适中,盖层连续性好,被确定为一级储层目标。采用基于机理的CO2地质储层方法,计算了不同单元的CO2储层容量。研究区二氧化碳理论总库容估计约为78 833.86 Mt,有效库容为189201 Mt。一级库段理论库容34 76166 Mt,有效库容834.28 Mt,占总库容的44.10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy & Fuels
Energy & Fuels 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
1101
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Energy & Fuels publishes reports of research in the technical area defined by the intersection of the disciplines of chemistry and chemical engineering and the application domain of non-nuclear energy and fuels. This includes research directed at the formation of, exploration for, and production of fossil fuels and biomass; the properties and structure or molecular composition of both raw fuels and refined products; the chemistry involved in the processing and utilization of fuels; fuel cells and their applications; and the analytical and instrumental techniques used in investigations of the foregoing areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信