Advancing extracellular vesicle production: improving physiological relevance and yield with 3D cell culture

IF 5.1 3区 材料科学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nanoscale Pub Date : 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1039/D5NR00707K
Kara Cook and Huiyan Li
{"title":"Advancing extracellular vesicle production: improving physiological relevance and yield with 3D cell culture","authors":"Kara Cook and Huiyan Li","doi":"10.1039/D5NR00707K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are essential nanoscale mediators of intercellular communication, holding significant potential as early disease biomarkers and therapeutic agents. Present in biological fluids like blood, EVs and their molecular cargo can be detected in liquid biopsies for diverse diagnostic and therapeutic applications. However, the availability of patient samples is often limited for such research. To tackle this challenge and gain insights into <em>in vivo</em> disease mechanisms, <em>in vitro</em> production of EVs from the cell culture models that closely mimic <em>in vivo</em> conditions has become an essential tool. While 2D cell culture has been the standard for high-throughput studies for decades, 3D cell culture is emerging as a more physiologically relevant <em>in vitro</em> tool for mimicking <em>in vivo</em> environments and providing deeper insights into disease. However, there is currently a lack of literature synthesizing and comparing the effects of 3D <em>versus</em> 2D cell culture models on EV production and analysis. In this review, we examine recent studies that compare the impacts of 3D and 2D cell culture models on EV yield, composition, and functionality. We categorize 3D models into subtypes, including spheroids, hydrogels, rigid scaffolds, and bioreactors. Details of each model's impact on EVs compared to 2D cell culture are presented. Furthermore, we discuss the advantages and limitations of these 3D models as identified in individual studies, offering insights to guide future research directions in this evolving field.</p>","PeriodicalId":92,"journal":{"name":"Nanoscale","volume":" 25","pages":" 15110-15131"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2025/nr/d5nr00707k?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanoscale","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/nr/d5nr00707k","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are essential nanoscale mediators of intercellular communication, holding significant potential as early disease biomarkers and therapeutic agents. Present in biological fluids like blood, EVs and their molecular cargo can be detected in liquid biopsies for diverse diagnostic and therapeutic applications. However, the availability of patient samples is often limited for such research. To tackle this challenge and gain insights into in vivo disease mechanisms, in vitro production of EVs from the cell culture models that closely mimic in vivo conditions has become an essential tool. While 2D cell culture has been the standard for high-throughput studies for decades, 3D cell culture is emerging as a more physiologically relevant in vitro tool for mimicking in vivo environments and providing deeper insights into disease. However, there is currently a lack of literature synthesizing and comparing the effects of 3D versus 2D cell culture models on EV production and analysis. In this review, we examine recent studies that compare the impacts of 3D and 2D cell culture models on EV yield, composition, and functionality. We categorize 3D models into subtypes, including spheroids, hydrogels, rigid scaffolds, and bioreactors. Details of each model's impact on EVs compared to 2D cell culture are presented. Furthermore, we discuss the advantages and limitations of these 3D models as identified in individual studies, offering insights to guide future research directions in this evolving field.

Abstract Image

推进细胞外囊泡的产生:提高三维细胞培养的生理相关性和产量
细胞外囊泡(EVs)是细胞间通讯的重要介质,作为早期疾病的生物标志物和治疗剂具有重要的潜力。存在于血液等生物液体中的ev及其分子货物可在液体活检中检测到,用于各种诊断和治疗应用。然而,对于此类研究而言,患者样本的可用性往往有限。为了应对这一挑战并深入了解体内疾病机制,从接近模拟体内条件的细胞培养模型中体外生产ev已成为必不可少的工具。几十年来,2D细胞培养一直是高通量研究的标准,而3D细胞培养正在成为一种与生理更相关的体外工具,用于模拟体内环境,并提供对疾病的更深入了解。然而,目前缺乏文献综合和比较3D和2D细胞培养模型对EV生产和分析的影响。在这篇综述中,我们研究了最近的研究,比较了3D和2D细胞培养模型对EV产量、组成和功能的影响。我们将3D模型分类为亚型,包括球体,水凝胶,刚性支架和生物反应器。介绍了与二维细胞培养相比,每种模型对电动汽车的影响的细节。此外,我们还讨论了这些3D模型在个别研究中的优点和局限性,为指导这一不断发展的领域的未来研究方向提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nanoscale
Nanoscale CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
1628
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Nanoscale is a high-impact international journal, publishing high-quality research across nanoscience and nanotechnology. Nanoscale publishes a full mix of research articles on experimental and theoretical work, including reviews, communications, and full papers.Highly interdisciplinary, this journal appeals to scientists, researchers and professionals interested in nanoscience and nanotechnology, quantum materials and quantum technology, including the areas of physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, materials, energy/environment, information technology, detection science, healthcare and drug discovery, and electronics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信