Does the operator's generational cohort influence the accuracy of orthodontic miniscrews insertion in the palatine vault in dynamic computer-guided surgery? A randomized prospective study.
{"title":"Does the operator's generational cohort influence the accuracy of orthodontic miniscrews insertion in the palatine vault in dynamic computer-guided surgery? A randomized prospective study.","authors":"Davide Brilli, Matteo Giansanti, Michele Cassetta","doi":"10.1007/s10006-025-01414-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate intergenerational differences in miniscrew placement accuracy in the palatine vault using dynamic computer-assisted surgery (d-CAS), and to assess the correlation between the number of surgeries, and both accuracy variables and procedure duration.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>72 subjects were enrolled and for each two miniscrews were inserted in the paramedian region via d-CAS (144 overall). Subjects were randomly allocated into three groups according to the operator's generation: Group A (Generation X), Group B (Generation Y), and Group C (Generation Z). CBCT scans were superimposed to evaluate five variables: Entry-3D, Entry-2D, Apex-3D, Apex-Vertical, and angular deviation. Procedure duration was calculated. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Tukey and Dunn's tests and Pearson Correlation. P-value was set at ≤ 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ANOVA test demonstrated significant differences between the three groups in Entry-3D (P < 0.001), Entry-2D (P < 0.001), and Apex-3D (P = < 0.001) parameters, while Kruskal-Wallis test found a significant difference in angular deviation (P = 0.003). Post-hoc comparison revealed significant differences between groups A and C, and groups B and C. Pearson correlation indicated a negative correlation between intervention time and number of surgeries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Miniscrew insertion using d-CAS is operator-dependent, and the generational cohort of the operator is a factor that influences certain accuracy parameters. There is a correlation between the progression of surgeries and a reduction in the time employed. Understanding the impact of generational differences can encourage the use of digital technologies for novices in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>NCT06661551 (clinicaltrials.gov; 10/25/2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":520733,"journal":{"name":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","volume":"29 1","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral and maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01414-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate intergenerational differences in miniscrew placement accuracy in the palatine vault using dynamic computer-assisted surgery (d-CAS), and to assess the correlation between the number of surgeries, and both accuracy variables and procedure duration.
Materials and methods: 72 subjects were enrolled and for each two miniscrews were inserted in the paramedian region via d-CAS (144 overall). Subjects were randomly allocated into three groups according to the operator's generation: Group A (Generation X), Group B (Generation Y), and Group C (Generation Z). CBCT scans were superimposed to evaluate five variables: Entry-3D, Entry-2D, Apex-3D, Apex-Vertical, and angular deviation. Procedure duration was calculated. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, Shapiro-Wilk, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, Tukey and Dunn's tests and Pearson Correlation. P-value was set at ≤ 0.05.
Results: ANOVA test demonstrated significant differences between the three groups in Entry-3D (P < 0.001), Entry-2D (P < 0.001), and Apex-3D (P = < 0.001) parameters, while Kruskal-Wallis test found a significant difference in angular deviation (P = 0.003). Post-hoc comparison revealed significant differences between groups A and C, and groups B and C. Pearson correlation indicated a negative correlation between intervention time and number of surgeries.
Conclusions: Miniscrew insertion using d-CAS is operator-dependent, and the generational cohort of the operator is a factor that influences certain accuracy parameters. There is a correlation between the progression of surgeries and a reduction in the time employed. Understanding the impact of generational differences can encourage the use of digital technologies for novices in clinical practice.
目的:本研究旨在评估使用动态计算机辅助手术(d-CAS)在腭顶放置微钉准确性的代际差异,并评估手术次数、准确性变量和手术时间之间的相关性。材料和方法:72名受试者入组,每个受试者通过d-CAS插入2枚微型螺钉(共144枚)。受试者按操作者所属年龄随机分为三组:A组(X世代)、B组(Y世代)、C组(Z世代)。CBCT扫描叠加评估五个变量:Entry-3D、Entry-2D、Apex-3D、Apex-Vertical和角度偏差。计算过程持续时间。统计分析包括描述性统计、Shapiro-Wilk、ANOVA、Kruskal-Wallis、Tukey和Dunn检验和Pearson相关。p值设为≤0.05。结果:ANOVA检验显示三组之间在入口- 3d (P)方面存在显著差异。结论:使用d-CAS插入微型支架与操作人员有关,操作人员的世代队列是影响某些准确性参数的因素。手术的进展与所用时间的减少之间存在相关性。了解代际差异的影响可以鼓励新手在临床实践中使用数字技术。临床试验编号:NCT06661551 (clinicaltrials.gov;10/25/2024)。