Developing the Right for You? intervention to improve engagement in community-based palliative care: A feasibility study and pilot test.

Elizabeth Luth, Denalee O'Malley, Carlin Brickner, Ruiqi Xue, Kathryn H Bowles
{"title":"Developing the Right for You? intervention to improve engagement in community-based palliative care: A feasibility study and pilot test.","authors":"Elizabeth Luth, Denalee O'Malley, Carlin Brickner, Ruiqi Xue, Kathryn H Bowles","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community-based palliative care (CBPC) can improve symptom management and quality of life at reduced costs (through hospitalization prevention) for seriously ill older adults. However, CBPC services are underutilized due to multi-level factors including patient perceptions and lack of systematic methods for providers to identify and communicate the potential value of these services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The purpose of this study is to describe the co-design of Right for You? (R4U?) intervention materials and to present pilot test results of feasibility and preliminary effectiveness testing. R4U? was designed to improve how a CBPC program (offered as part of a Medicare Advantage health plan) is presented to seriously ill older adults and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings suggest the co-designed R4U? was acceptable to clinicians and when pilot tested demonstrated preliminary effectiveness with a seven percentage-point increase in enrollment in the CBPC program during the intervention period (May-September 2024).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our preliminary findings support the acceptability and feasibility of using tailored R4U? as a way of increasing interest and enrollment in a CBPC program. Additional research is needed to determine if observed increases in CBPC enrollment are sustainable over time and scalable in other settings to improve enrollment in CBPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94243,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community-based palliative care (CBPC) can improve symptom management and quality of life at reduced costs (through hospitalization prevention) for seriously ill older adults. However, CBPC services are underutilized due to multi-level factors including patient perceptions and lack of systematic methods for providers to identify and communicate the potential value of these services.

Methods: The purpose of this study is to describe the co-design of Right for You? (R4U?) intervention materials and to present pilot test results of feasibility and preliminary effectiveness testing. R4U? was designed to improve how a CBPC program (offered as part of a Medicare Advantage health plan) is presented to seriously ill older adults and their caregivers.

Results: Our findings suggest the co-designed R4U? was acceptable to clinicians and when pilot tested demonstrated preliminary effectiveness with a seven percentage-point increase in enrollment in the CBPC program during the intervention period (May-September 2024).

Conclusions: Our preliminary findings support the acceptability and feasibility of using tailored R4U? as a way of increasing interest and enrollment in a CBPC program. Additional research is needed to determine if observed increases in CBPC enrollment are sustainable over time and scalable in other settings to improve enrollment in CBPC.

开发适合你的游戏?干预措施,以提高参与社区姑息治疗:可行性研究和试点试验。
背景:基于社区的姑息治疗(CBPC)能够以较低的成本(通过住院预防)改善重症老年人的症状管理和生活质量。然而,由于患者的认知和缺乏系统的方法来识别和传达这些服务的潜在价值等多层次因素,CBPC服务未得到充分利用。方法:本研究的目的是描述“适合你?”(R4U?)干预材料,并提交可行性和初步有效性测试的试点测试结果。R4U吗?旨在改善CBPC计划(作为医疗保险优势健康计划的一部分)如何向重病老年人及其护理人员提供。结果:我们的研究结果表明,共同设计的R4U?临床医生可以接受,并且在干预期间(2024年5月至9月),CBPC项目的入学率增加了7个百分点,初步证明了有效性。结论:我们的初步研究结果支持了定制R4U?作为增加对CBPC项目的兴趣和注册的一种方式。需要进一步的研究来确定观察到的CBPC入组人数的增加是否随着时间的推移而持续,并且在其他环境中可扩展以提高CBPC入组人数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信