Comparison of the Combination of Interscalene Block and Superficial Cervical Block Anaesthesia with Interscalene Block Anaesthesia in Shoulder Surgery Operations.

Abdulhakim Sengel, Selcuk Secilmis, Evren Buyukfirat, Nuray Altay, Veysi Yazar, Mehmet Baki Bilsel
{"title":"Comparison of the Combination of Interscalene Block and Superficial Cervical Block Anaesthesia with Interscalene Block Anaesthesia in Shoulder Surgery Operations.","authors":"Abdulhakim Sengel, Selcuk Secilmis, Evren Buyukfirat, Nuray Altay, Veysi Yazar, Mehmet Baki Bilsel","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.06.769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare shoulder surgery patients who received interscalene nerve block (INB) and superficial cervical block (SCB) anaesthesia with those who received only INB anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine Harran University, Haliliye, Turkiye, from October 2020 to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A total of 60 participants aged between 18 and 75 years, belonging to the ASA I-II physical class and scheduled for arthroplastic and arthroscopic shoulder surgery, were divided into two groups. Group I received INB + SCB; Group II received only INB. Variables were compared as per the objective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic variables. There was no significant difference between Group I and Group II in VAS scores at the 1st hour; however, a significant difference was observed at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th hours, with lower VAS scores in Group I.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined block method resulted in lower postoperative pain scores, longer pain-free periods, less opioid requirement, and higher patient satisfaction. Therefore, the INB + SCB combination will be a safe, less time-consuming, and highly effective alternative to other anaesthetic methods in arthroscopic and arthroplastic shoulder surgeries.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Anaesthesia, Brachial plexus block, Cervical plexus block, Regional anaesthesia, Shoulder, Surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"35 6","pages":"769-773"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.06.769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare shoulder surgery patients who received interscalene nerve block (INB) and superficial cervical block (SCB) anaesthesia with those who received only INB anaesthesia.

Study design: Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine Harran University, Haliliye, Turkiye, from October 2020 to April 2023.

Methodology: A total of 60 participants aged between 18 and 75 years, belonging to the ASA I-II physical class and scheduled for arthroplastic and arthroscopic shoulder surgery, were divided into two groups. Group I received INB + SCB; Group II received only INB. Variables were compared as per the objective.

Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic variables. There was no significant difference between Group I and Group II in VAS scores at the 1st hour; however, a significant difference was observed at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th hours, with lower VAS scores in Group I.

Conclusion: Combined block method resulted in lower postoperative pain scores, longer pain-free periods, less opioid requirement, and higher patient satisfaction. Therefore, the INB + SCB combination will be a safe, less time-consuming, and highly effective alternative to other anaesthetic methods in arthroscopic and arthroplastic shoulder surgeries.

Key words: Anaesthesia, Brachial plexus block, Cervical plexus block, Regional anaesthesia, Shoulder, Surgery.

肩关节手术中斜角肌间阻滞联合颈浅阻滞与斜角肌间阻滞联合麻醉的比较。
目的:比较肩关节手术患者接受斜角间神经阻滞(INB)和颈浅阻滞(SCB)麻醉与仅接受INB麻醉的患者。研究设计:观察性研究。研究地点和时间:2020年10月至2023年4月,土耳其哈利利耶哈兰大学医学院麻醉与复苏系。方法:将60名年龄在18岁至75岁之间,属于ASA I-II级身体等级并计划进行关节成形术和关节镜肩关节手术的参与者分为两组。第一组接受INB + SCB;第二组仅接受INB。根据目标对变量进行比较。结果:两组在人口学变量方面无显著差异。两组患者第1小时VAS评分差异无统计学意义;然而,在第3、6、12小时观察到显著差异,第一组VAS评分较低。结论:联合阻滞法术后疼痛评分较低,无痛期较长,阿片类药物需求较少,患者满意度较高。因此,在关节镜和关节成形术中,INB + SCB联合将是一种安全、省时、高效的替代其他麻醉方法的方法。关键词:麻醉,臂丛阻滞,颈丛阻滞,区域麻醉,肩部,外科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信