Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for the Provision of a District-Wide Diabetes Retinal Screening Service.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jason R Daley, Xingdi Wang, Natalie Ngo, Chee L Khoo, Peter Heydon, Gerald Liew, Vallimayil Vallayutham, Tobias Kongbrailatpam, Uchechukwu L Osuagwu, Marko Andric, Wei Xuan, David Simmons, Shweta Kaushik
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for the Provision of a District-Wide Diabetes Retinal Screening Service.","authors":"Jason R Daley, Xingdi Wang, Natalie Ngo, Chee L Khoo, Peter Heydon, Gerald Liew, Vallimayil Vallayutham, Tobias Kongbrailatpam, Uchechukwu L Osuagwu, Marko Andric, Wei Xuan, David Simmons, Shweta Kaushik","doi":"10.1111/ceo.14560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) enhanced retinal screening could reduce the impact of diabetic retinopathy (DR), the leading cause of preventable blindness in Australia. This study assessed the performance and validity of a dual-modality, deep learning system for detection of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (vtDR) in a multi-ethnic community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional (algorithm-validation) study with the deep learning system assessing fundus photographs for gradability and severity of DR, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans for diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Internal validation of each algorithm was performed using a computer-randomised 80:20 split. External validation was by comparison to standard grading provided by two ophthalmologists in 748 prospectively recruited persons with diabetes (age ≥ 10) from hospital diabetes clinics and a general practice. Main outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal validation revealed robust test characteristics. When compared to ophthalmologists, the system achieved an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.94) for fundus photograph gradeability, 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.94) for the diagnosis of severe non-proliferative DR/proliferative DR and 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.96) for DMO detection from OCT scans. It demonstrated real-world applicability with an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97), sensitivity of 92.7% and specificity of 95.5% for detection of vtDR. Ungradable images occurred in 55 participants (7.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dual-modality, deep learning system can diagnose vtDR from fundus photographs and OCT scans with high levels of accuracy and specificity. This could support a novel model of care for DR screening in our community.</p>","PeriodicalId":55253,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14560","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) enhanced retinal screening could reduce the impact of diabetic retinopathy (DR), the leading cause of preventable blindness in Australia. This study assessed the performance and validity of a dual-modality, deep learning system for detection of vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (vtDR) in a multi-ethnic community.

Methods: Cross-sectional (algorithm-validation) study with the deep learning system assessing fundus photographs for gradability and severity of DR, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans for diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Internal validation of each algorithm was performed using a computer-randomised 80:20 split. External validation was by comparison to standard grading provided by two ophthalmologists in 748 prospectively recruited persons with diabetes (age ≥ 10) from hospital diabetes clinics and a general practice. Main outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: Internal validation revealed robust test characteristics. When compared to ophthalmologists, the system achieved an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.94) for fundus photograph gradeability, 0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.94) for the diagnosis of severe non-proliferative DR/proliferative DR and 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.96) for DMO detection from OCT scans. It demonstrated real-world applicability with an AUC of 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97), sensitivity of 92.7% and specificity of 95.5% for detection of vtDR. Ungradable images occurred in 55 participants (7.4%).

Conclusions: The dual-modality, deep learning system can diagnose vtDR from fundus photographs and OCT scans with high levels of accuracy and specificity. This could support a novel model of care for DR screening in our community.

为提供全区糖尿病视网膜筛检服务而开发及验证深度学习系统。
背景:人工智能(AI)增强视网膜筛查可以减少糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的影响,糖尿病视网膜病变是澳大利亚可预防性失明的主要原因。本研究评估了双模式深度学习系统在多民族社区检测视力威胁糖尿病视网膜病变(vtDR)的性能和有效性。方法:采用深度学习系统进行横断面(算法验证)研究,评估眼底照片的可分级性和DR的严重程度,以及光学相干断层扫描(OCT)扫描糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DMO)。每个算法的内部验证使用计算机随机80:20分割进行。外部验证通过与两名眼科医生提供的标准评分进行比较,该评分来自医院糖尿病诊所和普通诊所的748名前瞻性招募的糖尿病患者(年龄≥10岁)。主要评价指标包括敏感性、特异性和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:内部验证显示了稳健的试验特征。与眼科医生相比,该系统眼底照片分级能力的AUC为0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.94),诊断严重非增生性DR/增生性DR的AUC为0.91 (95% CI 0.85-0.94), OCT扫描DMO检测的AUC为0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.96)。该方法的AUC为0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97),灵敏度为92.7%,特异性为95.5%,适用于vtDR的检测。55名参与者(7.4%)出现了无法分级的图像。结论:双模态深度学习系统可从眼底照片和OCT扫描诊断vtDR,具有较高的准确性和特异性。这可以为我们社区的DR筛查提供一种新的护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
150
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original research and reviews dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research which are international in scope and application. CEO recognises the importance of collaborative research and welcomes papers that have a direct influence on ophthalmic practice but are not unique to ophthalmology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信