Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease in the era of biologics.

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY
Tanya M Laidlaw
{"title":"Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease in the era of biologics.","authors":"Tanya M Laidlaw","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a chronic, inflammatory syndrome defined by asthma, nasal polyposis, and respiratory sensitivity to cyclooxygenase-1-inhibiting NSAIDs. Patients with AERD often suffer from severe nasal polyps, frequent sinus surgeries, impaired sense of smell, and persistent asthma. Traditional therapies, including corticosteroids, endoscopic sinus surgery, and aspirin desensitization, have offered symptomatic relief but are often limited by side effects or short-lived efficacy. In recent years, the emergence of targeted biologics-including anti-IL-5/5Rα (mepolizumab, benralizumab), anti-IgE (omalizumab), anti-IL-4Rα (dupilumab), and anti-TSLP (tezepelumab)-has significantly expanded the treatment landscape for AERD, providing non-surgical options that directly modulate type 2 inflammation and improve both upper and lower airway symptoms. This review synthesizes available data on the efficacy and applicability of each available biologic in AERD, highlighting benefits such as restoration of smell, reduced corticosteroid use, fewer surgical interventions, and potentially diminished NSAID sensitivity. However, challenges remain. Biologics are costly and not universally accessible, long-term safety data are limited, and no reliable biomarkers currently exist to guide therapeutic selection. Not all patients respond to every agent, underscoring the need for personalized medicine approaches. Future directions include developing predictive biomarkers, conducting head-to-head biologic trials, and exploring earlier biologic intervention to modify disease progression. While not curative, biologics offer meaningful improvements in quality of life for many patients with AERD. Ongoing research and innovation are essential to realize a future where treatment decisions are guided by precision, accessibility, and sustained disease control.</p>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2025.06.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a chronic, inflammatory syndrome defined by asthma, nasal polyposis, and respiratory sensitivity to cyclooxygenase-1-inhibiting NSAIDs. Patients with AERD often suffer from severe nasal polyps, frequent sinus surgeries, impaired sense of smell, and persistent asthma. Traditional therapies, including corticosteroids, endoscopic sinus surgery, and aspirin desensitization, have offered symptomatic relief but are often limited by side effects or short-lived efficacy. In recent years, the emergence of targeted biologics-including anti-IL-5/5Rα (mepolizumab, benralizumab), anti-IgE (omalizumab), anti-IL-4Rα (dupilumab), and anti-TSLP (tezepelumab)-has significantly expanded the treatment landscape for AERD, providing non-surgical options that directly modulate type 2 inflammation and improve both upper and lower airway symptoms. This review synthesizes available data on the efficacy and applicability of each available biologic in AERD, highlighting benefits such as restoration of smell, reduced corticosteroid use, fewer surgical interventions, and potentially diminished NSAID sensitivity. However, challenges remain. Biologics are costly and not universally accessible, long-term safety data are limited, and no reliable biomarkers currently exist to guide therapeutic selection. Not all patients respond to every agent, underscoring the need for personalized medicine approaches. Future directions include developing predictive biomarkers, conducting head-to-head biologic trials, and exploring earlier biologic intervention to modify disease progression. While not curative, biologics offer meaningful improvements in quality of life for many patients with AERD. Ongoing research and innovation are essential to realize a future where treatment decisions are guided by precision, accessibility, and sustained disease control.

生物制剂时代的阿司匹林加重呼吸道疾病。
阿司匹林加重呼吸系统疾病(AERD)是一种慢性炎症综合征,由哮喘、鼻息肉病和呼吸道对环氧化酶-1抑制非甾体抗炎药的敏感性所定义。患有AERD的患者通常患有严重的鼻息肉、频繁的鼻窦手术、嗅觉受损和持续性哮喘。传统的治疗方法,包括皮质类固醇、内窥镜鼻窦手术和阿司匹林脱敏,已经提供了症状缓解,但往往受到副作用或短期疗效的限制。近年来,靶向生物制剂的出现,包括抗il -5/ 5r α (mepolizumab, benralizumab),抗ige (omalizumab),抗il - 4r α (dupilumab)和抗tslp (tezepelumab),显著扩大了AERD的治疗领域,提供了直接调节2型炎症和改善上呼吸道和下呼吸道症状的非手术选择。本综述综合了AERD中每种生物制剂的疗效和适用性的现有数据,强调了其益处,如恢复嗅觉、减少皮质类固醇的使用、减少手术干预和可能降低非甾体抗炎药的敏感性。然而,挑战依然存在。生物制剂价格昂贵,不能普遍获得,长期安全性数据有限,目前还没有可靠的生物标志物来指导治疗选择。并非所有患者对每种药物都有反应,这强调了个性化医疗方法的必要性。未来的方向包括开发预测性生物标志物,进行头对头生物学试验,探索早期生物干预来改变疾病进展。虽然不能治愈,但生物制剂为许多AERD患者的生活质量提供了有意义的改善。正在进行的研究和创新对于实现以精确、可及性和持续疾病控制为指导的治疗决策的未来至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
6.80%
发文量
437
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信