{"title":"Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease in the era of biologics.","authors":"Tanya M Laidlaw","doi":"10.1016/j.anai.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a chronic, inflammatory syndrome defined by asthma, nasal polyposis, and respiratory sensitivity to cyclooxygenase-1-inhibiting NSAIDs. Patients with AERD often suffer from severe nasal polyps, frequent sinus surgeries, impaired sense of smell, and persistent asthma. Traditional therapies, including corticosteroids, endoscopic sinus surgery, and aspirin desensitization, have offered symptomatic relief but are often limited by side effects or short-lived efficacy. In recent years, the emergence of targeted biologics-including anti-IL-5/5Rα (mepolizumab, benralizumab), anti-IgE (omalizumab), anti-IL-4Rα (dupilumab), and anti-TSLP (tezepelumab)-has significantly expanded the treatment landscape for AERD, providing non-surgical options that directly modulate type 2 inflammation and improve both upper and lower airway symptoms. This review synthesizes available data on the efficacy and applicability of each available biologic in AERD, highlighting benefits such as restoration of smell, reduced corticosteroid use, fewer surgical interventions, and potentially diminished NSAID sensitivity. However, challenges remain. Biologics are costly and not universally accessible, long-term safety data are limited, and no reliable biomarkers currently exist to guide therapeutic selection. Not all patients respond to every agent, underscoring the need for personalized medicine approaches. Future directions include developing predictive biomarkers, conducting head-to-head biologic trials, and exploring earlier biologic intervention to modify disease progression. While not curative, biologics offer meaningful improvements in quality of life for many patients with AERD. Ongoing research and innovation are essential to realize a future where treatment decisions are guided by precision, accessibility, and sustained disease control.</p>","PeriodicalId":50773,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Allergy Asthma & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2025.06.001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a chronic, inflammatory syndrome defined by asthma, nasal polyposis, and respiratory sensitivity to cyclooxygenase-1-inhibiting NSAIDs. Patients with AERD often suffer from severe nasal polyps, frequent sinus surgeries, impaired sense of smell, and persistent asthma. Traditional therapies, including corticosteroids, endoscopic sinus surgery, and aspirin desensitization, have offered symptomatic relief but are often limited by side effects or short-lived efficacy. In recent years, the emergence of targeted biologics-including anti-IL-5/5Rα (mepolizumab, benralizumab), anti-IgE (omalizumab), anti-IL-4Rα (dupilumab), and anti-TSLP (tezepelumab)-has significantly expanded the treatment landscape for AERD, providing non-surgical options that directly modulate type 2 inflammation and improve both upper and lower airway symptoms. This review synthesizes available data on the efficacy and applicability of each available biologic in AERD, highlighting benefits such as restoration of smell, reduced corticosteroid use, fewer surgical interventions, and potentially diminished NSAID sensitivity. However, challenges remain. Biologics are costly and not universally accessible, long-term safety data are limited, and no reliable biomarkers currently exist to guide therapeutic selection. Not all patients respond to every agent, underscoring the need for personalized medicine approaches. Future directions include developing predictive biomarkers, conducting head-to-head biologic trials, and exploring earlier biologic intervention to modify disease progression. While not curative, biologics offer meaningful improvements in quality of life for many patients with AERD. Ongoing research and innovation are essential to realize a future where treatment decisions are guided by precision, accessibility, and sustained disease control.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology is a scholarly medical journal published monthly by the American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The purpose of Annals is to serve as an objective evidence-based forum for the allergy/immunology specialist to keep up to date on current clinical science (both research and practice-based) in the fields of allergy, asthma, and immunology. The emphasis of the journal will be to provide clinical and research information that is readily applicable to both the clinician and the researcher. Each issue of the Annals shall also provide opportunities to participate in accredited continuing medical education activities to enhance overall clinical proficiency.