Pharmacy Homeless Outreach Engagement Non-medical Independent Prescribing Rx (PHOENIx) Community Pharmacy-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Richard Lowrie, Vibhu Paudyal, Andrew McPherson, Helena Heath, Jane Moir, Natalie Allen, Nigel Barnes, Hugh Hill, Adnan Araf, Cian Lombard, Steven Ross, Sarah Tearne, Parbir Jagpal, Versha Cheed, Lee Middleton, Shabana Akhtar, George Provan, Jennifer Hislop, Andrea Williamson, Frances S Mair
{"title":"Pharmacy Homeless Outreach Engagement Non-medical Independent Prescribing Rx (PHOENIx) Community Pharmacy-Based Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Richard Lowrie, Vibhu Paudyal, Andrew McPherson, Helena Heath, Jane Moir, Natalie Allen, Nigel Barnes, Hugh Hill, Adnan Araf, Cian Lombard, Steven Ross, Sarah Tearne, Parbir Jagpal, Versha Cheed, Lee Middleton, Shabana Akhtar, George Provan, Jennifer Hislop, Andrea Williamson, Frances S Mair","doi":"10.1007/s11524-025-00981-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aiming to address the multiple health and social challenges of people experiencing homelessness (PEH) are lacking. Here we report the findings from a multicenter, open, pilot RCT. The intervention involved independent prescriber pharmacist from the National Health Service working on outreach in partnership with dedicated workers from Homeless Voluntary Charity or Social Enterprises (HVCSEs) (Pharmacist and third sector charity worker integrated Homeless Outreach Engagement Non-medical Independent prescriber Rx'-PHOENIx) in low threshold HVCSE venues or temporary accommodation addressing PEH participants' health and wider needs through repeated outreach. The trial aimed to investigate whether sufficient numbers of participants could be recruited, retained, the intervention delivered as planned, and sufficient data collected to inform a subsequent definitive RCT. Clinical outcomes were also collected at follow-up (6 months). Participants were recruited from five community pharmacies and nearby venues in urban centers of Glasgow-Scotland and Birmingham-England, then randomized one-to-one into PHOENIx intervention in addition to usual care (UC) or UC only. A priori progression criteria were achieved: 55% of those assessed as eligible were recruited; at 6 months, 72% remained in the study, 91% had emergency department and mortality data available, and 72% completed questionnaire booklets. Fifty-three percent of participants received at least 50% of the planned PHOENIx intervention consultations (in-person or phone) at 6 months. Signs of improvement in clinical outcomes in the PHOENIx group included fewer ambulance call-outs, ED visits, and hospitalizations; higher outpatient attendances; and higher scores on self-reported health-related quality of life. A definitive RCT is merited.</p>","PeriodicalId":49964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"540-563"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-025-00981-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aiming to address the multiple health and social challenges of people experiencing homelessness (PEH) are lacking. Here we report the findings from a multicenter, open, pilot RCT. The intervention involved independent prescriber pharmacist from the National Health Service working on outreach in partnership with dedicated workers from Homeless Voluntary Charity or Social Enterprises (HVCSEs) (Pharmacist and third sector charity worker integrated Homeless Outreach Engagement Non-medical Independent prescriber Rx'-PHOENIx) in low threshold HVCSE venues or temporary accommodation addressing PEH participants' health and wider needs through repeated outreach. The trial aimed to investigate whether sufficient numbers of participants could be recruited, retained, the intervention delivered as planned, and sufficient data collected to inform a subsequent definitive RCT. Clinical outcomes were also collected at follow-up (6 months). Participants were recruited from five community pharmacies and nearby venues in urban centers of Glasgow-Scotland and Birmingham-England, then randomized one-to-one into PHOENIx intervention in addition to usual care (UC) or UC only. A priori progression criteria were achieved: 55% of those assessed as eligible were recruited; at 6 months, 72% remained in the study, 91% had emergency department and mortality data available, and 72% completed questionnaire booklets. Fifty-three percent of participants received at least 50% of the planned PHOENIx intervention consultations (in-person or phone) at 6 months. Signs of improvement in clinical outcomes in the PHOENIx group included fewer ambulance call-outs, ED visits, and hospitalizations; higher outpatient attendances; and higher scores on self-reported health-related quality of life. A definitive RCT is merited.

Abstract Image

药房无家可归者外展参与非医疗独立处方Rx (PHOENIx)社区药房试点随机对照试验。
缺乏旨在解决无家可归者面临的多重健康和社会挑战的随机对照试验。在此,我们报告了一项多中心、开放、试点随机对照试验的结果。干预涉及来自国家卫生服务的独立处方药剂师与来自无家可归者志愿慈善机构或社会企业(HVCSEs)的专职工作人员合作开展外展工作(药剂师和第三部门慈善工作者整合了无家可归者外展参与非医疗独立处方处方Rx'-PHOENIx),在低门槛的HVCSE场所或临时住所通过反复外展解决PEH参与者的健康和更广泛的需求。该试验旨在调查是否可以招募、保留足够数量的参与者,干预措施是否按计划进行,以及收集到足够的数据来为随后的最终RCT提供信息。在随访(6个月)时收集临床结果。参与者从格拉斯哥-苏格兰和伯明翰-英格兰城市中心的五个社区药店和附近的场所招募,然后随机分为一对一的PHOENIx干预和常规护理(UC)或仅UC。达到先验进展标准:55%被评估为合格的人被招募;6个月时,72%的人仍在研究中,91%的人有急诊科和死亡率数据,72%的人完成了问卷小册子。53%的参与者在6个月时接受了至少50%的凤凰计划干预咨询(面对面或电话)。PHOENIx组临床结果改善的迹象包括救护车呼叫、急诊科就诊和住院次数减少;更高的门诊人次;自我报告的健康相关生活质量得分更高。值得进行一项明确的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Urban Health is the premier and authoritative source of rigorous analyses to advance the health and well-being of people in cities. The Journal provides a platform for interdisciplinary exploration of the evidence base for the broader determinants of health and health inequities needed to strengthen policies, programs, and governance for urban health. The Journal publishes original data, case studies, commentaries, book reviews, executive summaries of selected reports, and proceedings from important global meetings. It welcomes submissions presenting new analytic methods, including systems science approaches to urban problem solving. Finally, the Journal provides a forum linking scholars, practitioners, civil society, and policy makers from the multiple sectors that can influence the health of urban populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信