Measuring incremental burdens associated with increasing preventive-treatment failures among adults with migraine: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Pub Date : 2025-06-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562864251337431
Jessica Ailani, Nemin Chen, Avani Patel, Nathan Spence, Nikoletta Sternbach, Katie B Tellor, Motomori Lewis, Joshua Brown
{"title":"Measuring incremental burdens associated with increasing preventive-treatment failures among adults with migraine: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.","authors":"Jessica Ailani, Nemin Chen, Avani Patel, Nathan Spence, Nikoletta Sternbach, Katie B Tellor, Motomori Lewis, Joshua Brown","doi":"10.1177/17562864251337431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine inflicts substantial personal, social, and economic tolls on many adults in the United States (US). Acute and preventive medicines can offer some relief, but most patients are untreated or experience treatment failures. How preventive-treatment failures affect outcomes for patients no longer on preventive treatments or for patients with migraine is insufficiently understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure the patient-reported health and economic burdens associated with increasing preventive-treatment failures among US adults with diagnosed migraine.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data analyzed were from the 2023 US National Health and Wellness Survey. Participants were adults diagnosed with migraine, having ≥4 monthly migraine or headache days, having taken acute or preventive prescription migraine medications or currently taking acute prescription migraine medications, and taking no preventive migraine medications. Participants were categorized as never treated with preventive medicines, having failed 1 preventive medicine, or having failed ≥2 preventive medicines. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed with the Migraine Disability Assessment, RAND's 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument, 5-Level EuroQoL instrument (EQ-5D), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment General Health version, 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire, and 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. Details about medication use and health care resource use (HCRU) were collected. Data were adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting and compared using two-sided two-sample <i>t</i>-tests or Chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who had failed preventive treatments had poorer HRQoL, greater work productivity loss, greater nonwork activity impairment, and greater HCRU than patients who had never taken preventive treatments. The number of preventive-treatment failures scaled with disease burden. Patients with ≥2 treatment failures had significantly lower EQ-5D scores (0.69 vs 0.73) than those for prevention-naïve patients; patients with ≥2 treatment failures had significantly higher overall work productivity loss (45.9% vs 34.9%), activity impairment (46.8% vs 36.7%), and higher rates of emergency room visits (37.0% vs 25.2%), hospitalization (23.5% vs 12.3%), and neurologist visits (17.6 vs 10.9%) than those of prevention-naïve patients. Medication overuse rates were similar among patients with any treatment failures and prevention-naïve patients (migraine-specific: 34.4%-39.3%; overall: 59.2%-62.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>US adults with frequent migraines who failed preventive treatments have significantly greater unmet needs and different acute medication use patterns than adults who never took treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":22980,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562864251337431"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864251337431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Migraine inflicts substantial personal, social, and economic tolls on many adults in the United States (US). Acute and preventive medicines can offer some relief, but most patients are untreated or experience treatment failures. How preventive-treatment failures affect outcomes for patients no longer on preventive treatments or for patients with migraine is insufficiently understood.

Objective: To measure the patient-reported health and economic burdens associated with increasing preventive-treatment failures among US adults with diagnosed migraine.

Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional study.

Methods: Data analyzed were from the 2023 US National Health and Wellness Survey. Participants were adults diagnosed with migraine, having ≥4 monthly migraine or headache days, having taken acute or preventive prescription migraine medications or currently taking acute prescription migraine medications, and taking no preventive migraine medications. Participants were categorized as never treated with preventive medicines, having failed 1 preventive medicine, or having failed ≥2 preventive medicines. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed with the Migraine Disability Assessment, RAND's 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument, 5-Level EuroQoL instrument (EQ-5D), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment General Health version, 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire, and 7-Item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. Details about medication use and health care resource use (HCRU) were collected. Data were adjusted by inverse probability of treatment weighting and compared using two-sided two-sample t-tests or Chi-square tests.

Results: Patients who had failed preventive treatments had poorer HRQoL, greater work productivity loss, greater nonwork activity impairment, and greater HCRU than patients who had never taken preventive treatments. The number of preventive-treatment failures scaled with disease burden. Patients with ≥2 treatment failures had significantly lower EQ-5D scores (0.69 vs 0.73) than those for prevention-naïve patients; patients with ≥2 treatment failures had significantly higher overall work productivity loss (45.9% vs 34.9%), activity impairment (46.8% vs 36.7%), and higher rates of emergency room visits (37.0% vs 25.2%), hospitalization (23.5% vs 12.3%), and neurologist visits (17.6 vs 10.9%) than those of prevention-naïve patients. Medication overuse rates were similar among patients with any treatment failures and prevention-naïve patients (migraine-specific: 34.4%-39.3%; overall: 59.2%-62.3%).

Conclusion: US adults with frequent migraines who failed preventive treatments have significantly greater unmet needs and different acute medication use patterns than adults who never took treatments.

测量与成人偏头痛患者预防治疗失败增加相关的增量负担:一项回顾性横断面研究。
背景:在美国,偏头痛对许多成年人造成了巨大的个人、社会和经济损失。急性和预防性药物可以提供一些缓解,但大多数患者未经治疗或经历治疗失败。预防治疗失败如何影响不再接受预防治疗的患者或偏头痛患者的预后尚不清楚。目的:在美国诊断为偏头痛的成年人中,测量患者报告的与预防治疗失败增加相关的健康和经济负担。设计:回顾性、横断面研究。方法:数据分析来自2023年美国国家健康与健康调查。参与者是诊断为偏头痛的成年人,每月偏头痛或头痛天数≥4天,曾服用急性或预防性处方偏头痛药物或目前正在服用急性处方偏头痛药物,未服用预防性偏头痛药物。参与者被分类为从未使用过预防药物、1种预防药物治疗失败或2种以上预防药物治疗失败。健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)采用偏头痛残疾评估、RAND的36项简短问卷调查工具、5级EuroQoL工具(EQ-5D)、工作效率和活动障碍一般健康版、9项患者健康问卷和7项广泛性焦虑障碍量表进行评估。收集药物使用和卫生保健资源使用(HCRU)的详细信息。采用处理加权逆概率法调整数据,采用双侧双样本t检验或卡方检验进行比较。结果:与未接受预防治疗的患者相比,预防治疗失败的患者HRQoL较差,工作效率损失较大,非工作活动障碍较大,HCRU较大。预防治疗失败的数量随着疾病负担的增加而增加。≥2次治疗失败患者的EQ-5D评分显著低于prevention-naïve患者(0.69 vs 0.73);≥2次治疗失败的患者总体工作效率损失(45.9% vs 34.9%)、活动障碍(46.8% vs 36.7%)显著高于prevention-naïve患者,急诊室就诊率(37.0% vs 25.2%)、住院率(23.5% vs 12.3%)和神经科就诊率(17.6% vs 10.9%)也高于prevention-naïve患者。任何治疗失败的患者和prevention-naïve患者的药物过度使用率相似(偏头痛特异性:34.4%-39.3%;总体:59.2% - -62.3%)。结论:预防治疗失败的美国成人频繁偏头痛患者的未满足需求和急性药物使用模式明显大于未接受治疗的成年人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders is a peer-reviewed, open access journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies across all areas of neurology. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in neurology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信