Jing Zhang, Yanyan Ye, Xu Huang, Yan Ding, Xia Li, Chunquan Zhang
{"title":"A study on the evaluation of left atrial function in lupus nephritis patients using left atrial automated functional imaging technology.","authors":"Jing Zhang, Yanyan Ye, Xu Huang, Yan Ding, Xia Li, Chunquan Zhang","doi":"10.1177/09612033251346342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesEmploying advanced left atrial automated functional myocardial imaging technology to investigate whether patients with lupus nephritis (LN) experience more severe cardiac impairment compared to extra-renal systemic lupus erythematosus (extra-renal SLE) patients, while also identifying the primary risk factors affecting left atrial reservoir strain (LASR) in LN patients.MethodsRoutine echocardiographic evaluations were performed on patients with lupus nephritis (LN), Extra-renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and healthy controls. The left atrial automated functional imaging (AFILA) technique was employed to measure LASR, left atrial conduit strain (LASCD), and left atrial contraction strain (LASCT) for all study participants. Demographic characteristics of all participants were collected, along with clinical and laboratory features for the case group.ResultsWe included 42 healthy controls, 91 patients with extra-renal SLE, and 79 patients with LN. LASR, LASCD, and LASCT in the LN group were all significantly lower than those in the extra-renal SLE group and the control group, with the extra-renal SLE group also exhibiting lower values than the control group (LASR: 22.00% vs 27.00% vs 36.00%, <i>p</i> < .001; LASCD: -14.00% vs -17.00% vs -24.00%, <i>p</i> < .001; LASCT: -9.00% vs -10.00% vs -14.00%, <i>p</i> < .001). A multiple regression analysis of LASR in the LN group indicated that triglycerides (TG) were the sole laboratory indicator independently associated with it (β[SE]: -1.025 [0.370], <i>p</i> = .007).ConclusionsThe degree of LA involvement in patients with LN was significantly greater than in those with extra-renal SLE, with TG potentially serving as the only laboratory indicator capable of effectively predicting LASR. Furthermore, AFILA technology demonstrates considerable potential for the early identification of subclinical myocardial damage.</p>","PeriodicalId":18044,"journal":{"name":"Lupus","volume":" ","pages":"888-898"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033251346342","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectivesEmploying advanced left atrial automated functional myocardial imaging technology to investigate whether patients with lupus nephritis (LN) experience more severe cardiac impairment compared to extra-renal systemic lupus erythematosus (extra-renal SLE) patients, while also identifying the primary risk factors affecting left atrial reservoir strain (LASR) in LN patients.MethodsRoutine echocardiographic evaluations were performed on patients with lupus nephritis (LN), Extra-renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and healthy controls. The left atrial automated functional imaging (AFILA) technique was employed to measure LASR, left atrial conduit strain (LASCD), and left atrial contraction strain (LASCT) for all study participants. Demographic characteristics of all participants were collected, along with clinical and laboratory features for the case group.ResultsWe included 42 healthy controls, 91 patients with extra-renal SLE, and 79 patients with LN. LASR, LASCD, and LASCT in the LN group were all significantly lower than those in the extra-renal SLE group and the control group, with the extra-renal SLE group also exhibiting lower values than the control group (LASR: 22.00% vs 27.00% vs 36.00%, p < .001; LASCD: -14.00% vs -17.00% vs -24.00%, p < .001; LASCT: -9.00% vs -10.00% vs -14.00%, p < .001). A multiple regression analysis of LASR in the LN group indicated that triglycerides (TG) were the sole laboratory indicator independently associated with it (β[SE]: -1.025 [0.370], p = .007).ConclusionsThe degree of LA involvement in patients with LN was significantly greater than in those with extra-renal SLE, with TG potentially serving as the only laboratory indicator capable of effectively predicting LASR. Furthermore, AFILA technology demonstrates considerable potential for the early identification of subclinical myocardial damage.
目的采用先进的左心房自动功能心肌成像技术,探讨狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者是否比肾外系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者经历更严重的心脏损害,同时确定影响LN患者左心房储层应变(LASR)的主要危险因素。方法对狼疮性肾炎(LN)、肾外系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者及健康对照者进行常规超声心动图评价。采用左心房自动功能成像(AFILA)技术测量所有研究参与者的LASR、左心房导管应变(LASCD)和左心房收缩应变(LASCT)。收集了所有参与者的人口统计学特征,以及病例组的临床和实验室特征。结果我们纳入了42名健康对照、91名肾外SLE患者和79名LN患者。LN组LASR、LASCD、LASCT均显著低于肾外SLE组和对照组,且肾外SLE组也低于对照组(LASR: 22.00% vs 27.00% vs 36.00%, p < 0.001;LASCD: -14.00% vs -17.00% vs -24.00%, p < 0.001;lastct: -9.00% vs -10.00% vs -14.00%, p < 0.001)。LN组LASR的多元回归分析表明,甘油三酯(TG)是唯一与之独立相关的实验室指标(β[SE]: -1.025 [0.370], p = .007)。结论LN患者的LASR受累程度明显大于肾外SLE患者,TG可能是唯一能够有效预测LASR的实验室指标。此外,AFILA技术在亚临床心肌损伤的早期识别方面显示出相当大的潜力。
期刊介绍:
The only fully peer reviewed international journal devoted exclusively to lupus (and related disease) research. Lupus includes the most promising new clinical and laboratory-based studies from leading specialists in all lupus-related disciplines. Invaluable reading, with extended coverage, lupus-related disciplines include: Rheumatology, Dermatology, Immunology, Obstetrics, Psychiatry and Cardiovascular Research…