The Effect of Phlebotomy on Physiological Responses during Submaximal, Prolonged Exercise.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Hilkka Kontro, Michael T Jensen, Allison M Caswell, Saied J Aboodarda, Martin J MacInnis
{"title":"The Effect of Phlebotomy on Physiological Responses during Submaximal, Prolonged Exercise.","authors":"Hilkka Kontro, Michael T Jensen, Allison M Caswell, Saied J Aboodarda, Martin J MacInnis","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The influence of reduced blood volume on prolonged submaximal exercise is unclear. Using a sham-controlled design, we investigated the effect of acute phlebotomy on physiological responses to 60 minutes of submaximal exercise and its subsequent impact on severe-intensity exercise performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>After baseline testing and a control trial, 17 moderately trained participants (5 female) underwent phlebotomy (PHLE) to withdraw 7% of total blood volume or a sham procedure (SHAM). Cardiorespiratory, metabolic, perceptual, and neuromuscular responses were assessed before, during, and after 60 minutes of submaximal exercise in the heavy domain (midway between the respiratory compensation point and the gas exchange threshold; 71 [6] % of V̇O2max) and in response to a subsequent severe intensity time-to-task failure (TTF) trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phlebotomy significantly affected ventilation (V̇E; +6 [7] % vs. control trial), ventilatory equivalent (+8 [8] %), heart rate (HR; +5 [4] %), O2 pulse (-6 [5] %), and blood lactate ([La]; +25 [32] %) during submaximal exercise (p < 0.05). Submaximal V̇O2, respiratory exchange ratio, perceived effort, and maximal voluntary contraction were unaffected by phlebotomy (p > 0.05). Phlebotomy reduced TTF by 24 [23] % (P = 0.018) without significantly reducing V̇O2peak (-5.6 [7.5] %, P = 0.09). Changes in V̇E (P = 0.004), HR (P = 0.003), O2 pulse (P = 0.009), and [La] (P < 0.001) between the control and experimental submaximal trials were correlated with changes in TTF (0.40 < R2 < 0.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Circulating vascular volumes impact physiological responses to submaximal exercise and influence subsequent maximal exercise performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003777","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The influence of reduced blood volume on prolonged submaximal exercise is unclear. Using a sham-controlled design, we investigated the effect of acute phlebotomy on physiological responses to 60 minutes of submaximal exercise and its subsequent impact on severe-intensity exercise performance.

Methods: After baseline testing and a control trial, 17 moderately trained participants (5 female) underwent phlebotomy (PHLE) to withdraw 7% of total blood volume or a sham procedure (SHAM). Cardiorespiratory, metabolic, perceptual, and neuromuscular responses were assessed before, during, and after 60 minutes of submaximal exercise in the heavy domain (midway between the respiratory compensation point and the gas exchange threshold; 71 [6] % of V̇O2max) and in response to a subsequent severe intensity time-to-task failure (TTF) trial.

Results: Phlebotomy significantly affected ventilation (V̇E; +6 [7] % vs. control trial), ventilatory equivalent (+8 [8] %), heart rate (HR; +5 [4] %), O2 pulse (-6 [5] %), and blood lactate ([La]; +25 [32] %) during submaximal exercise (p < 0.05). Submaximal V̇O2, respiratory exchange ratio, perceived effort, and maximal voluntary contraction were unaffected by phlebotomy (p > 0.05). Phlebotomy reduced TTF by 24 [23] % (P = 0.018) without significantly reducing V̇O2peak (-5.6 [7.5] %, P = 0.09). Changes in V̇E (P = 0.004), HR (P = 0.003), O2 pulse (P = 0.009), and [La] (P < 0.001) between the control and experimental submaximal trials were correlated with changes in TTF (0.40 < R2 < 0.68).

Conclusions: Circulating vascular volumes impact physiological responses to submaximal exercise and influence subsequent maximal exercise performance.

静脉切开术对亚极限长时间运动中生理反应的影响。
前言:血容量减少对长时间亚极限运动的影响尚不清楚。采用假对照设计,我们研究了急性静脉切开术对60分钟亚极限运动生理反应的影响及其随后对高强度运动表现的影响。方法:在基线测试和对照试验后,17名中等训练的参与者(5名女性)接受了静脉切开术(PHLE),抽取总血容量的7%或假手术(sham)。在重域(呼吸代偿点和气体交换阈值之间的中间位置;在随后的严重强度时间到任务失败(TTF)试验中。结果:静脉切开术显著影响通气(V * E;+6[8] %(对照试验),通气当量(+8[8]%),心率(HR;+5[5] %),氧脉冲(-6[5]%),血乳酸([La];+25 [32] %) (p < 0.05)。亚最大V氧、呼吸交换比、感知力和最大自主收缩均不受放血影响(p < 0.05)。静脉切开术使TTF降低24 [23]% (P = 0.018),但未显著降低V / o峰值(-5.6 [7.5]%,P = 0.09)。对照组与试验组次极大试验的V (E) (P = 0.004)、HR (P = 0.003)、O2脉搏(P = 0.009)、[La] (P < 0.001)变化与TTF变化相关(0.40 < R2 < 0.68)。结论:循环血管容量影响亚极限运动的生理反应,并影响随后的极限运动表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信