Attitudes and Experiences With Informed Consent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Korea: A Mixed-Methods Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Min Ji Kim, Ilhak Lee, Jiyong Park, Chan Joo Lee, Won Lee, So Yoon Kim
{"title":"Attitudes and Experiences With Informed Consent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Korea: A Mixed-Methods Study.","authors":"Min Ji Kim, Ilhak Lee, Jiyong Park, Chan Joo Lee, Won Lee, So Yoon Kim","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most popular invasive cardiovascular procedures performed worldwide. However, patients often overestimate its benefits or underestimate potential risks, which should be addressed during informed consent (IC). In light of this, our study aimed to explore in greater depth the attitudes and experiences with IC regarding PCI in South Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study employed a sequential design following the guidelines of the Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation and Health Sciences. Between December 2022 and January 2023, a cross-sectional survey was completed by 255 patients and 136 physicians. From February to April 2023, in-depth interviews were conducted with 13 physicians were conducted and analyzed using conventional content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients and physicians showed a significant difference in agreement with the purpose of IC with respect to the right to self-determination (<i>P</i> < 0.001; mean patient rank 178.1, mean physician rank 228.0). There were gaps between patients and physicians in the degrees of agreement regarding understanding (<i>P</i> < 0.001; mean patient rank 182.2, mean physician rank 220.4) and remembering (<i>P</i> = 0.014; mean patient rank 185.5, mean physician rank 214.3) information during the IC process. Physicians experienced difficulties due to patients' low comprehension of the information provided during the IC process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients should first be educated on the purpose of IC to prepare them for receiving detailed information about PCI. When they are ready to accept information, strategies suggested by several studies may be applied to improve their understanding. This step-by-step provision of information will elevate patient compliance with IC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16249,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","volume":"40 22","pages":"e114"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is one of the most popular invasive cardiovascular procedures performed worldwide. However, patients often overestimate its benefits or underestimate potential risks, which should be addressed during informed consent (IC). In light of this, our study aimed to explore in greater depth the attitudes and experiences with IC regarding PCI in South Korea.

Methods: This mixed-methods study employed a sequential design following the guidelines of the Mixed Methods Reporting in Rehabilitation and Health Sciences. Between December 2022 and January 2023, a cross-sectional survey was completed by 255 patients and 136 physicians. From February to April 2023, in-depth interviews were conducted with 13 physicians were conducted and analyzed using conventional content analysis.

Results: Patients and physicians showed a significant difference in agreement with the purpose of IC with respect to the right to self-determination (P < 0.001; mean patient rank 178.1, mean physician rank 228.0). There were gaps between patients and physicians in the degrees of agreement regarding understanding (P < 0.001; mean patient rank 182.2, mean physician rank 220.4) and remembering (P = 0.014; mean patient rank 185.5, mean physician rank 214.3) information during the IC process. Physicians experienced difficulties due to patients' low comprehension of the information provided during the IC process.

Conclusion: Patients should first be educated on the purpose of IC to prepare them for receiving detailed information about PCI. When they are ready to accept information, strategies suggested by several studies may be applied to improve their understanding. This step-by-step provision of information will elevate patient compliance with IC.

韩国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗知情同意的态度和经验:一项混合方法研究。
背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是世界范围内最流行的侵入性心血管手术之一。然而,患者往往高估其益处或低估潜在风险,这应该在知情同意(IC)期间解决。鉴于此,我们的研究旨在更深入地探讨韩国对PCI的态度和经验。方法:本混合方法研究采用顺序设计,遵循康复与健康科学混合方法报告的指导方针。在2022年12月至2023年1月期间,255名患者和136名医生完成了一项横断面调查。于2023年2月至4月对13名医师进行深度访谈,采用常规内容分析法进行分析。结果:患者和医生对IC的目的在自决权方面的认同有显著差异(P < 0.001;患者平均排名178.1,医生平均排名228.0)。患者和医生在理解的一致程度上存在差距(P < 0.001;患者平均排名182.2,医生平均排名220.4)和记忆(P = 0.014;患者平均排名185.5,医生平均排名214.3)信息。由于患者对IC过程中提供的信息的理解程度较低,医生遇到了困难。结论:应首先对患者进行介入治疗目的的教育,为其接受PCI的详细信息做好准备。当他们准备好接受信息时,可以应用几项研究提出的策略来提高他们的理解能力。这种逐步提供的信息将提高患者对IC的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Journal of Korean Medical Science 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
320
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS) is an international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal of medicine published weekly in English. The Journal’s publisher is the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), Korean Medical Association (KMA). JKMS aims to publish evidence-based, scientific research articles from various disciplines of the medical sciences. The Journal welcomes articles of general interest to medical researchers especially when they contain original information. Articles on the clinical evaluation of drugs and other therapies, epidemiologic studies of the general population, studies on pathogenic organisms and toxic materials, and the toxicities and adverse effects of therapeutics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信